Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire

Tiina Ala-Outinen, Tuuli Oksanen

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fire resistance of austenitic stainless steels is known to be better than that of conventional carbon structural steels. The aim of this study was to find out whether any austenitic stainless steels are available for use in buildings as load-bearing structures without fire protection. This is a critical issue, as aesthetic considerations often undergird the use of stainless steels in buildings. Eliminating the fire protection of structures would result in lower construction costs, a shorter construction period, more effective interior space utilisation, a better working environment and more aesthetic building design. As part of the project transient-state tests were carried out at Helsinki University of Technology at the Laboratory of Steel Structures. The fire resistance tests were performed at VTT Building Technology at the Laboratory of Fire Technology. Concentric compression tests were performed for rectangular 40 x 40 x 4 hollow sections cold-formed from austenitic stainless steel of type Polarit 725 (conforming to material number EN 1.4301 and AISI 304). The behaviour of the butt-welded joint at elevated temperatures was also considered. A simple calculation method is proposed for determining the flexural buckling strength of structures exposed to fire. The simple calculation method is valid when the modified slenderness is below 1.1 at normal temperature. The same formulae are used to determine the ultimate buckling load at elevated temperatures as at normal temperature, but in the former the mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity and yield strength) are reduced. The temperature is assumed to be uniformly distributed throughout the cross-section and along the column. The possibilities of using austenitic stainless steels in load-bearing structures without fire protection seem quite realistic when the parametric fire exposure is adapted or the fire resistance time is 30 minutes or less according to the ISO 834 standard fire-temperature curve. The class requirement of 30 minutes in a standard fire exposure might cause overestimation in normal temperature design. One of the most workable applications of stainless steel might be the load-bearing structures of balconies.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages59
ISBN (Print)951-38-5161-3
Publication statusPublished - 1997
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Publication series

NameVTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes
PublisherVTT
No.1864
ISSN (Print)1235-0605
ISSN (Electronic)1455-0865

Fingerprint

Fires
Compaction
Stainless steel
Bearings (structural)
Austenitic stainless steel
Fire resistance
Fire protection
Temperature
Buckling
Interiors (building)
Steel structures
Yield stress
Loads (forces)
Welds
Elastic moduli
Mechanical properties
Carbon
Steel
Costs

Keywords

  • austenitic stainless steels
  • fire resistance
  • buckling loads
  • compression tests
  • steel construction

Cite this

Ala-Outinen, T., & Oksanen, T. (1997). Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes, No. 1864
Ala-Outinen, Tiina ; Oksanen, Tuuli. / Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1997. 59 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 1864).
@book{5d2d251a5a754b43bd4872a755c3fa14,
title = "Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire",
abstract = "The fire resistance of austenitic stainless steels is known to be better than that of conventional carbon structural steels. The aim of this study was to find out whether any austenitic stainless steels are available for use in buildings as load-bearing structures without fire protection. This is a critical issue, as aesthetic considerations often undergird the use of stainless steels in buildings. Eliminating the fire protection of structures would result in lower construction costs, a shorter construction period, more effective interior space utilisation, a better working environment and more aesthetic building design. As part of the project transient-state tests were carried out at Helsinki University of Technology at the Laboratory of Steel Structures. The fire resistance tests were performed at VTT Building Technology at the Laboratory of Fire Technology. Concentric compression tests were performed for rectangular 40 x 40 x 4 hollow sections cold-formed from austenitic stainless steel of type Polarit 725 (conforming to material number EN 1.4301 and AISI 304). The behaviour of the butt-welded joint at elevated temperatures was also considered. A simple calculation method is proposed for determining the flexural buckling strength of structures exposed to fire. The simple calculation method is valid when the modified slenderness is below 1.1 at normal temperature. The same formulae are used to determine the ultimate buckling load at elevated temperatures as at normal temperature, but in the former the mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity and yield strength) are reduced. The temperature is assumed to be uniformly distributed throughout the cross-section and along the column. The possibilities of using austenitic stainless steels in load-bearing structures without fire protection seem quite realistic when the parametric fire exposure is adapted or the fire resistance time is 30 minutes or less according to the ISO 834 standard fire-temperature curve. The class requirement of 30 minutes in a standard fire exposure might cause overestimation in normal temperature design. One of the most workable applications of stainless steel might be the load-bearing structures of balconies.",
keywords = "austenitic stainless steels, fire resistance, buckling loads, compression tests, steel construction",
author = "Tiina Ala-Outinen and Tuuli Oksanen",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
isbn = "951-38-5161-3",
series = "VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
number = "1864",
address = "Finland",

}

Ala-Outinen, T & Oksanen, T 1997, Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire. VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes, no. 1864, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire. / Ala-Outinen, Tiina; Oksanen, Tuuli.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1997. 59 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 1864).

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire

AU - Ala-Outinen, Tiina

AU - Oksanen, Tuuli

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The fire resistance of austenitic stainless steels is known to be better than that of conventional carbon structural steels. The aim of this study was to find out whether any austenitic stainless steels are available for use in buildings as load-bearing structures without fire protection. This is a critical issue, as aesthetic considerations often undergird the use of stainless steels in buildings. Eliminating the fire protection of structures would result in lower construction costs, a shorter construction period, more effective interior space utilisation, a better working environment and more aesthetic building design. As part of the project transient-state tests were carried out at Helsinki University of Technology at the Laboratory of Steel Structures. The fire resistance tests were performed at VTT Building Technology at the Laboratory of Fire Technology. Concentric compression tests were performed for rectangular 40 x 40 x 4 hollow sections cold-formed from austenitic stainless steel of type Polarit 725 (conforming to material number EN 1.4301 and AISI 304). The behaviour of the butt-welded joint at elevated temperatures was also considered. A simple calculation method is proposed for determining the flexural buckling strength of structures exposed to fire. The simple calculation method is valid when the modified slenderness is below 1.1 at normal temperature. The same formulae are used to determine the ultimate buckling load at elevated temperatures as at normal temperature, but in the former the mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity and yield strength) are reduced. The temperature is assumed to be uniformly distributed throughout the cross-section and along the column. The possibilities of using austenitic stainless steels in load-bearing structures without fire protection seem quite realistic when the parametric fire exposure is adapted or the fire resistance time is 30 minutes or less according to the ISO 834 standard fire-temperature curve. The class requirement of 30 minutes in a standard fire exposure might cause overestimation in normal temperature design. One of the most workable applications of stainless steel might be the load-bearing structures of balconies.

AB - The fire resistance of austenitic stainless steels is known to be better than that of conventional carbon structural steels. The aim of this study was to find out whether any austenitic stainless steels are available for use in buildings as load-bearing structures without fire protection. This is a critical issue, as aesthetic considerations often undergird the use of stainless steels in buildings. Eliminating the fire protection of structures would result in lower construction costs, a shorter construction period, more effective interior space utilisation, a better working environment and more aesthetic building design. As part of the project transient-state tests were carried out at Helsinki University of Technology at the Laboratory of Steel Structures. The fire resistance tests were performed at VTT Building Technology at the Laboratory of Fire Technology. Concentric compression tests were performed for rectangular 40 x 40 x 4 hollow sections cold-formed from austenitic stainless steel of type Polarit 725 (conforming to material number EN 1.4301 and AISI 304). The behaviour of the butt-welded joint at elevated temperatures was also considered. A simple calculation method is proposed for determining the flexural buckling strength of structures exposed to fire. The simple calculation method is valid when the modified slenderness is below 1.1 at normal temperature. The same formulae are used to determine the ultimate buckling load at elevated temperatures as at normal temperature, but in the former the mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity and yield strength) are reduced. The temperature is assumed to be uniformly distributed throughout the cross-section and along the column. The possibilities of using austenitic stainless steels in load-bearing structures without fire protection seem quite realistic when the parametric fire exposure is adapted or the fire resistance time is 30 minutes or less according to the ISO 834 standard fire-temperature curve. The class requirement of 30 minutes in a standard fire exposure might cause overestimation in normal temperature design. One of the most workable applications of stainless steel might be the load-bearing structures of balconies.

KW - austenitic stainless steels

KW - fire resistance

KW - buckling loads

KW - compression tests

KW - steel construction

M3 - Report

SN - 951-38-5161-3

T3 - VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes

BT - Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Ala-Outinen T, Oksanen T. Stainless steel compression members exposed to fire. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1997. 59 p. (VTT Tiedotteita - Meddelanden - Research Notes; No. 1864).