Abstract
In this paper we mobilize sustainability transitions literature to explore directionality for circular economy (CE) transitions, by drawing on and adapting a framework for analysing roadmaps to empirically investigate CE strategies. Specifically, this paper explores circular economy CE strategy documents in the Nordics, the commonalities and differences between them and to what extent they provide directionality for CE transitions. Through a systematic document analysis of 39 CE strategy documents, we find that the strategy documents are vague and lack clear political visions. As such, we argue that the documents fail to provide clear directionality for CE transitions and question their usefulness. Additionally, the paper demonstrates how CE strategy documents can contribute to promoting the development of industries that couple to national ambitions for the development of new, green industries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 443-457 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2024 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
This research have been founded by the EU project TREASoURcE (HORIZON-CL6-2021-CIRCBIO-01-01\u2014Circular Cities and Regions Initiative (CCRI)\u2019s circular systemic solutions. Grant Agreement No. 101059491). A special thank you to our colleges Jelizaveta Krenjova-Cepilova and Pirjo Kaivos.
Keywords
- circular economy
- directionality
- Nordic countries
- sustainability
- transition