Structural distinction due to deposition method in ultrathin films of cellulose nanofibres

Benjamin P. Wilson, Kirsi Yliniemi, Marie Gestranius, Minna Hakalahti, Matti Putkonen, Mari Lundström, Maarit Karppinen, Tekla Tammelin, Eero Kontturi (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This research explores fundamental, structural differences of ultrathin films, prepared with three distinct deposition methods using 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-1-oxyl radical oxidized cellulose nanofibres (TEMPO-CNFs) derived from never dried bleached birch pulp. There is standard characterization by atomic force microscopy (morphology, roughness) and ellipsometry (thickness) and important structural data is gained by exposing the films to water vapor and monitoring the vapor uptake with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). Significant distinctions were found from QCM data that could be linked to the structure of the films, originating from the three deposition methods: adsorption, spin coating and electrophoretic deposition. Moreover, the results shown here have potential implications for various types of films that comprise of amphiphilic nanomaterials that have a distinct response to moisture or aqueous based solutions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1715-1724
Number of pages10
JournalCellulose
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Ultrathin films
Nanofibers
Cellulose
Quartz crystal microbalances
oxidized cellulose
Bleached pulp
Ellipsometry
Steam
Spin coating
Nanostructured materials
Water vapor
Atomic force microscopy
Moisture
Surface roughness
Vapors
Adsorption
Monitoring

Keywords

  • Electrophoretic deposition
  • Humidity response
  • TEMPO-oxidised nanofibrillated cellulose
  • Ultrathin films
  • Water uptake

Cite this

Wilson, B. P., Yliniemi, K., Gestranius, M., Hakalahti, M., Putkonen, M., Lundström, M., ... Kontturi, E. (2018). Structural distinction due to deposition method in ultrathin films of cellulose nanofibres. Cellulose, 25(3), 1715-1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1665-y
Wilson, Benjamin P. ; Yliniemi, Kirsi ; Gestranius, Marie ; Hakalahti, Minna ; Putkonen, Matti ; Lundström, Mari ; Karppinen, Maarit ; Tammelin, Tekla ; Kontturi, Eero. / Structural distinction due to deposition method in ultrathin films of cellulose nanofibres. In: Cellulose. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 1715-1724.
@article{17b2e1f74f574648bac685b69039bf63,
title = "Structural distinction due to deposition method in ultrathin films of cellulose nanofibres",
abstract = "This research explores fundamental, structural differences of ultrathin films, prepared with three distinct deposition methods using 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-1-oxyl radical oxidized cellulose nanofibres (TEMPO-CNFs) derived from never dried bleached birch pulp. There is standard characterization by atomic force microscopy (morphology, roughness) and ellipsometry (thickness) and important structural data is gained by exposing the films to water vapor and monitoring the vapor uptake with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). Significant distinctions were found from QCM data that could be linked to the structure of the films, originating from the three deposition methods: adsorption, spin coating and electrophoretic deposition. Moreover, the results shown here have potential implications for various types of films that comprise of amphiphilic nanomaterials that have a distinct response to moisture or aqueous based solutions.",
keywords = "Electrophoretic deposition, Humidity response, TEMPO-oxidised nanofibrillated cellulose, Ultrathin films, Water uptake",
author = "Wilson, {Benjamin P.} and Kirsi Yliniemi and Marie Gestranius and Minna Hakalahti and Matti Putkonen and Mari Lundstr{\"o}m and Maarit Karppinen and Tekla Tammelin and Eero Kontturi",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10570-018-1665-y",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1715--1724",
journal = "Cellulose",
issn = "0969-0239",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Wilson, BP, Yliniemi, K, Gestranius, M, Hakalahti, M, Putkonen, M, Lundström, M, Karppinen, M, Tammelin, T & Kontturi, E 2018, 'Structural distinction due to deposition method in ultrathin films of cellulose nanofibres', Cellulose, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1715-1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1665-y

Structural distinction due to deposition method in ultrathin films of cellulose nanofibres. / Wilson, Benjamin P.; Yliniemi, Kirsi; Gestranius, Marie; Hakalahti, Minna; Putkonen, Matti; Lundström, Mari; Karppinen, Maarit; Tammelin, Tekla; Kontturi, Eero (Corresponding Author).

In: Cellulose, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 1715-1724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural distinction due to deposition method in ultrathin films of cellulose nanofibres

AU - Wilson, Benjamin P.

AU - Yliniemi, Kirsi

AU - Gestranius, Marie

AU - Hakalahti, Minna

AU - Putkonen, Matti

AU - Lundström, Mari

AU - Karppinen, Maarit

AU - Tammelin, Tekla

AU - Kontturi, Eero

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This research explores fundamental, structural differences of ultrathin films, prepared with three distinct deposition methods using 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-1-oxyl radical oxidized cellulose nanofibres (TEMPO-CNFs) derived from never dried bleached birch pulp. There is standard characterization by atomic force microscopy (morphology, roughness) and ellipsometry (thickness) and important structural data is gained by exposing the films to water vapor and monitoring the vapor uptake with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). Significant distinctions were found from QCM data that could be linked to the structure of the films, originating from the three deposition methods: adsorption, spin coating and electrophoretic deposition. Moreover, the results shown here have potential implications for various types of films that comprise of amphiphilic nanomaterials that have a distinct response to moisture or aqueous based solutions.

AB - This research explores fundamental, structural differences of ultrathin films, prepared with three distinct deposition methods using 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-1-oxyl radical oxidized cellulose nanofibres (TEMPO-CNFs) derived from never dried bleached birch pulp. There is standard characterization by atomic force microscopy (morphology, roughness) and ellipsometry (thickness) and important structural data is gained by exposing the films to water vapor and monitoring the vapor uptake with quartz crystal microbalance (QCM). Significant distinctions were found from QCM data that could be linked to the structure of the films, originating from the three deposition methods: adsorption, spin coating and electrophoretic deposition. Moreover, the results shown here have potential implications for various types of films that comprise of amphiphilic nanomaterials that have a distinct response to moisture or aqueous based solutions.

KW - Electrophoretic deposition

KW - Humidity response

KW - TEMPO-oxidised nanofibrillated cellulose

KW - Ultrathin films

KW - Water uptake

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040794469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10570-018-1665-y

DO - 10.1007/s10570-018-1665-y

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1715

EP - 1724

JO - Cellulose

JF - Cellulose

SN - 0969-0239

IS - 3

ER -