Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Suitability of Different Methods for Measuring Black Carbon Emissions from Marine Engines

  • Päivi Aakko-Saksa*
  • , Niina Kuittinen
  • , Timo Murtonen
  • , Päivi Koponen
  • , Minna Aurela
  • , Anssi Järvinen
  • , Kimmo Teinilä
  • , Sanna Saarikoski
  • , Luis M. F. Barreira
  • , Laura Salo
  • , Panu Karjalainen
  • , Ismael K. Ortega
  • , David Delhaye
  • , Kati Lehtoranta
  • , Hannu Vesala
  • , Pasi Jalava
  • , Topi Rönkkö
  • , Hilkka Timonen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • Tampere University
    • Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)
    • University of Paris-Saclay
    • University of Eastern Finland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    441 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Black carbon (BC) emissions intensify global warming and are linked to adverse health effects. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) considers the impact of BC emissions from international shipping. A prerequisite for the anticipated limits to BC emissions from marine engines is a reliable measurement method. The three candidate methods (photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS), laser-induced incandescence (LII), and filter smoke number (FSN)) selected by the IMO were evaluated with extensive ship exhaust matrices obtained by different fuels, engines, and emission control devices. A few instruments targeted for atmospheric measurements were included as well. The BC concentrations were close to each other with the smoke meters (AVL 415S and 415SE), PAS (AVL MSS), LII (Artium-300), MAAP 5012, aethalometers (Magee AE-33 and AE-42), and EC (TOA). In most cases, the standard deviation between instruments was in the range of 5–15% at BC concentrations below 30 mg Sm−3. Some differences in the BC concentrations measured with these instruments were potentially related to the ratio of light-absorbing compounds to sulphates or to particle sizes and morphologies. In addition, calibrations, sampling, and correction of thermophoretic loss of BC explained differences in the BC results. However, overall differences in the BC results obtained with three candidate methods selected by the IMO were low despite challenging exhaust compositions from marine diesel engines. Findings will inform decision making on BC emission control from marine engines.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number31
    Number of pages27
    JournalAtmosphere
    Volume13
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Funding

    This research was funded by Business Finland (SEA-EFFECTS BC No 40356/14 and BC footprint No 1441/31/2019), Traficom (198717/02.03.00/2020), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme (H2020 TUBE No 814978), Academy of Finland Flagship funding (grant nos. 337552, 337551), and from industrial partners.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Suitability of Different Methods for Measuring Black Carbon Emissions from Marine Engines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this