Sulphate removal from mine water with chemical, biological and membrane technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chemical, physical and biological technologies for removal of sulphate from mine tailings pond water (8 g SO4 2-/L) were investigated. Sulphate concentrations of approximately 1,400, 700, 350 and 20 mg/L were obtained using gypsum precipitation, and ettringite precipitation, biological sulphate reduction or reverse osmosis (RO) after gypsum pre-treatment, respectively. Gypsum precipitation can be widely utilized as a pre-treatment method, as was shown in this study. Clearly the lowest sulphate concentrations were obtained using RO. However, RO cannot be the only water purification technology, because the concentrate needs to be treated. There would be advantages using biological sulphate reduction, when elemental sulphur could be produced as a sellable end product. Reagent and energy costs for 200 m3/h tailings pond water feed based on laboratory studies and process modelling were 1.1, 3.1, 1.2 and 2.7 MEur/year for gypsum precipitation, ettringite precipitation, RO and biological treatment after gypsum precipitation, respectively. The most appropriate technology or combination of technologies should be selected for every industrial site case by case.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-205
Number of pages12
JournalWater Science and Technology
Volume2017
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Membrane technology
Gypsum
gypsum
Reverse osmosis
sulfate
membrane
Tailings
Ponds
Water
water
appropriate technology
Purification
Sulfur
sulfur
Sulfates
chemical
removal
reverse osmosis
cost
modeling

Keywords

  • Biological Sulphate Reduction
  • Ettringite
  • Gypsum
  • Membrane
  • Sulphate

Cite this

@article{04975c938fce4481b7937fc0dc67f4de,
title = "Sulphate removal from mine water with chemical, biological and membrane technologies",
abstract = "Chemical, physical and biological technologies for removal of sulphate from mine tailings pond water (8 g SO4 2-/L) were investigated. Sulphate concentrations of approximately 1,400, 700, 350 and 20 mg/L were obtained using gypsum precipitation, and ettringite precipitation, biological sulphate reduction or reverse osmosis (RO) after gypsum pre-treatment, respectively. Gypsum precipitation can be widely utilized as a pre-treatment method, as was shown in this study. Clearly the lowest sulphate concentrations were obtained using RO. However, RO cannot be the only water purification technology, because the concentrate needs to be treated. There would be advantages using biological sulphate reduction, when elemental sulphur could be produced as a sellable end product. Reagent and energy costs for 200 m3/h tailings pond water feed based on laboratory studies and process modelling were 1.1, 3.1, 1.2 and 2.7 MEur/year for gypsum precipitation, ettringite precipitation, RO and biological treatment after gypsum precipitation, respectively. The most appropriate technology or combination of technologies should be selected for every industrial site case by case.",
keywords = "Biological Sulphate Reduction, Ettringite, Gypsum, Membrane, Sulphate",
author = "Pa{\"i}vi Kinnunen and Hanna Kyll{\"o}nen and Tommi Kaartinen and Jarno M{\"a}kinen and Juha Heikkinen and Ville Miettinen",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2166/wst.2018.102",
language = "English",
volume = "2017",
pages = "194--205",
journal = "Water Science and Technology",
issn = "0273-1223",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sulphate removal from mine water with chemical, biological and membrane technologies

AU - Kinnunen, Païvi

AU - Kyllönen, Hanna

AU - Kaartinen, Tommi

AU - Mäkinen, Jarno

AU - Heikkinen, Juha

AU - Miettinen, Ville

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Chemical, physical and biological technologies for removal of sulphate from mine tailings pond water (8 g SO4 2-/L) were investigated. Sulphate concentrations of approximately 1,400, 700, 350 and 20 mg/L were obtained using gypsum precipitation, and ettringite precipitation, biological sulphate reduction or reverse osmosis (RO) after gypsum pre-treatment, respectively. Gypsum precipitation can be widely utilized as a pre-treatment method, as was shown in this study. Clearly the lowest sulphate concentrations were obtained using RO. However, RO cannot be the only water purification technology, because the concentrate needs to be treated. There would be advantages using biological sulphate reduction, when elemental sulphur could be produced as a sellable end product. Reagent and energy costs for 200 m3/h tailings pond water feed based on laboratory studies and process modelling were 1.1, 3.1, 1.2 and 2.7 MEur/year for gypsum precipitation, ettringite precipitation, RO and biological treatment after gypsum precipitation, respectively. The most appropriate technology or combination of technologies should be selected for every industrial site case by case.

AB - Chemical, physical and biological technologies for removal of sulphate from mine tailings pond water (8 g SO4 2-/L) were investigated. Sulphate concentrations of approximately 1,400, 700, 350 and 20 mg/L were obtained using gypsum precipitation, and ettringite precipitation, biological sulphate reduction or reverse osmosis (RO) after gypsum pre-treatment, respectively. Gypsum precipitation can be widely utilized as a pre-treatment method, as was shown in this study. Clearly the lowest sulphate concentrations were obtained using RO. However, RO cannot be the only water purification technology, because the concentrate needs to be treated. There would be advantages using biological sulphate reduction, when elemental sulphur could be produced as a sellable end product. Reagent and energy costs for 200 m3/h tailings pond water feed based on laboratory studies and process modelling were 1.1, 3.1, 1.2 and 2.7 MEur/year for gypsum precipitation, ettringite precipitation, RO and biological treatment after gypsum precipitation, respectively. The most appropriate technology or combination of technologies should be selected for every industrial site case by case.

KW - Biological Sulphate Reduction

KW - Ettringite

KW - Gypsum

KW - Membrane

KW - Sulphate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051220760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2166/wst.2018.102

DO - 10.2166/wst.2018.102

M3 - Article

VL - 2017

SP - 194

EP - 205

JO - Water Science and Technology

JF - Water Science and Technology

SN - 0273-1223

IS - 1

ER -