TY - JOUR
T1 - Sulphate removal from mine water with chemical, biological and membrane technologies
AU - Kinnunen, Païvi
AU - Kyllönen, Hanna
AU - Kaartinen, Tommi
AU - Mäkinen, Jarno
AU - Heikkinen, Juha
AU - Miettinen, Ville
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Agnico Eagle Finland Oy.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IWA Publishing.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - Chemical, physical and biological technologies for removal of sulphate from mine tailings pond water (8 g SO4 2-/L) were investigated. Sulphate concentrations of approximately 1,400, 700, 350 and 20 mg/L were obtained using gypsum precipitation, and ettringite precipitation, biological sulphate reduction or reverse osmosis (RO) after gypsum pre-treatment, respectively. Gypsum precipitation can be widely utilized as a pre-treatment method, as was shown in this study. Clearly the lowest sulphate concentrations were obtained using RO. However, RO cannot be the only water purification technology, because the concentrate needs to be treated. There would be advantages using biological sulphate reduction, when elemental sulphur could be produced as a sellable end product. Reagent and energy costs for 200 m3/h tailings pond water feed based on laboratory studies and process modelling were 1.1, 3.1, 1.2 and 2.7 MEur/year for gypsum precipitation, ettringite precipitation, RO and biological treatment after gypsum precipitation, respectively. The most appropriate technology or combination of technologies should be selected for every industrial site case by case.
AB - Chemical, physical and biological technologies for removal of sulphate from mine tailings pond water (8 g SO4 2-/L) were investigated. Sulphate concentrations of approximately 1,400, 700, 350 and 20 mg/L were obtained using gypsum precipitation, and ettringite precipitation, biological sulphate reduction or reverse osmosis (RO) after gypsum pre-treatment, respectively. Gypsum precipitation can be widely utilized as a pre-treatment method, as was shown in this study. Clearly the lowest sulphate concentrations were obtained using RO. However, RO cannot be the only water purification technology, because the concentrate needs to be treated. There would be advantages using biological sulphate reduction, when elemental sulphur could be produced as a sellable end product. Reagent and energy costs for 200 m3/h tailings pond water feed based on laboratory studies and process modelling were 1.1, 3.1, 1.2 and 2.7 MEur/year for gypsum precipitation, ettringite precipitation, RO and biological treatment after gypsum precipitation, respectively. The most appropriate technology or combination of technologies should be selected for every industrial site case by case.
KW - Biological Sulphate Reduction
KW - Ettringite
KW - Gypsum
KW - Membrane
KW - Sulphate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051220760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2166/wst.2018.102
DO - 10.2166/wst.2018.102
M3 - Article
C2 - 29698234
AN - SCOPUS:85051220760
SN - 0273-1223
VL - 2017
SP - 194
EP - 205
JO - Water Science and Technology
JF - Water Science and Technology
IS - 1
ER -