Surface stresses in coated steel surfaces

Influence of a bond layer on surface fracture

Kenneth Holmberg (Corresponding Author), Anssi Laukkanen, Helena Ronkainen, Kim Wallin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thin hard coatings in the thickness range of only a few micrometers deposited by physical vapour deposition (PVD) on components or tools can improve the friction and wear properties by several orders of magnitude. A 2 μm thick TiN (E=300 GPa) coating on a high-speed steel substrate with a bond layer at the interface between the coating and the substrate was modelled by micro-level three-dimensional finite-element method (3D FEM) in order to optimise a coated surface with regard to coating fracture. Both compliant low modulus (E=100 GPa) and stiff high modulus (E=500 GPa) bond layers at the coating/substrate interface of 200 and 500 nm thickness were investigated. First principal stresses were simulated for scratch test geometry in the load range of 7.5–15 N. Very high stress concentrations of above 5700 MPa tensile stresses were observed in the bond layer just behind the contact zone for the stiffer bond layer. The stiff bond layer generated 5 times higher tensile stress maxima compared to the compliant bond layer. There was approximately 3.5 times larger strain in the compliant bond layer compared to the stiff bond layer. The general coating design advice based on this exercise is that when a bond layer is used e.g. for coating/substrate adhesion improvement should the bond layer be less stiff than the coating not to generate high and critical tensile stresses. The thickness of the bond layer may vary and is not critical with respect to generated stresses in the surface.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-148
Number of pages12
JournalTribology International
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed
Event34th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology - Lyon, France
Duration: 4 Sep 20077 Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Steel
steels
Coatings
coatings
Tensile stress
Substrates
tensile stress
Finite element method
Hard coatings
Physical vapor deposition
Stress concentration
Loads (forces)
Adhesion
critical loading
stress concentration
Wear of materials
Friction
physical exercise
Geometry
micrometers

Keywords

  • Hard coating
  • Finite-element method model
  • Coating adhesion
  • ProperTune

Cite this

@article{c10867d21dc94e98bc3722aaa5ce2124,
title = "Surface stresses in coated steel surfaces: Influence of a bond layer on surface fracture",
abstract = "Thin hard coatings in the thickness range of only a few micrometers deposited by physical vapour deposition (PVD) on components or tools can improve the friction and wear properties by several orders of magnitude. A 2 μm thick TiN (E=300 GPa) coating on a high-speed steel substrate with a bond layer at the interface between the coating and the substrate was modelled by micro-level three-dimensional finite-element method (3D FEM) in order to optimise a coated surface with regard to coating fracture. Both compliant low modulus (E=100 GPa) and stiff high modulus (E=500 GPa) bond layers at the coating/substrate interface of 200 and 500 nm thickness were investigated. First principal stresses were simulated for scratch test geometry in the load range of 7.5–15 N. Very high stress concentrations of above 5700 MPa tensile stresses were observed in the bond layer just behind the contact zone for the stiffer bond layer. The stiff bond layer generated 5 times higher tensile stress maxima compared to the compliant bond layer. There was approximately 3.5 times larger strain in the compliant bond layer compared to the stiff bond layer. The general coating design advice based on this exercise is that when a bond layer is used e.g. for coating/substrate adhesion improvement should the bond layer be less stiff than the coating not to generate high and critical tensile stresses. The thickness of the bond layer may vary and is not critical with respect to generated stresses in the surface.",
keywords = "Hard coating, Finite-element method model, Coating adhesion, ProperTune",
author = "Kenneth Holmberg and Anssi Laukkanen and Helena Ronkainen and Kim Wallin",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.triboint.2008.04.013",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "137--148",
journal = "Tribology International",
issn = "0301-679X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Surface stresses in coated steel surfaces : Influence of a bond layer on surface fracture. / Holmberg, Kenneth (Corresponding Author); Laukkanen, Anssi; Ronkainen, Helena; Wallin, Kim.

In: Tribology International, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2009, p. 137-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surface stresses in coated steel surfaces

T2 - Influence of a bond layer on surface fracture

AU - Holmberg, Kenneth

AU - Laukkanen, Anssi

AU - Ronkainen, Helena

AU - Wallin, Kim

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Thin hard coatings in the thickness range of only a few micrometers deposited by physical vapour deposition (PVD) on components or tools can improve the friction and wear properties by several orders of magnitude. A 2 μm thick TiN (E=300 GPa) coating on a high-speed steel substrate with a bond layer at the interface between the coating and the substrate was modelled by micro-level three-dimensional finite-element method (3D FEM) in order to optimise a coated surface with regard to coating fracture. Both compliant low modulus (E=100 GPa) and stiff high modulus (E=500 GPa) bond layers at the coating/substrate interface of 200 and 500 nm thickness were investigated. First principal stresses were simulated for scratch test geometry in the load range of 7.5–15 N. Very high stress concentrations of above 5700 MPa tensile stresses were observed in the bond layer just behind the contact zone for the stiffer bond layer. The stiff bond layer generated 5 times higher tensile stress maxima compared to the compliant bond layer. There was approximately 3.5 times larger strain in the compliant bond layer compared to the stiff bond layer. The general coating design advice based on this exercise is that when a bond layer is used e.g. for coating/substrate adhesion improvement should the bond layer be less stiff than the coating not to generate high and critical tensile stresses. The thickness of the bond layer may vary and is not critical with respect to generated stresses in the surface.

AB - Thin hard coatings in the thickness range of only a few micrometers deposited by physical vapour deposition (PVD) on components or tools can improve the friction and wear properties by several orders of magnitude. A 2 μm thick TiN (E=300 GPa) coating on a high-speed steel substrate with a bond layer at the interface between the coating and the substrate was modelled by micro-level three-dimensional finite-element method (3D FEM) in order to optimise a coated surface with regard to coating fracture. Both compliant low modulus (E=100 GPa) and stiff high modulus (E=500 GPa) bond layers at the coating/substrate interface of 200 and 500 nm thickness were investigated. First principal stresses were simulated for scratch test geometry in the load range of 7.5–15 N. Very high stress concentrations of above 5700 MPa tensile stresses were observed in the bond layer just behind the contact zone for the stiffer bond layer. The stiff bond layer generated 5 times higher tensile stress maxima compared to the compliant bond layer. There was approximately 3.5 times larger strain in the compliant bond layer compared to the stiff bond layer. The general coating design advice based on this exercise is that when a bond layer is used e.g. for coating/substrate adhesion improvement should the bond layer be less stiff than the coating not to generate high and critical tensile stresses. The thickness of the bond layer may vary and is not critical with respect to generated stresses in the surface.

KW - Hard coating

KW - Finite-element method model

KW - Coating adhesion

KW - ProperTune

U2 - 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.04.013

DO - 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.04.013

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 137

EP - 148

JO - Tribology International

JF - Tribology International

SN - 0301-679X

IS - 1

ER -