Abstract
This field study was designed to investigate and compare the potential
or sensitivity of the selected HASTE assessment methods to reflect the
effects of different surrogate in-vehicle information systems (S-IVIS)
on driver behaviour in an urban environment. Two types of S-IVIS were
used, an auditory one representing cognitive tasks and a visual one. The
interaction with other vehicles in yielding situations changed somewhat
when conducting the secondary task compared to normal driving. Both
S-IVIS tasks tended to decrease the proportion of proper yielding of the
right-of-way to other vehicles at urban intersections. In addition, the
interaction with vulnerable road users was affected by secondary task
performance as well. The S-IVIS tasks tended to produce increases in
speed before the intersection in cases when there were vulnerable road
users present at the urban intersection compared to driving without the
secondary task. However, the cognitive task seemed more frequently to
cause observed inappropriate behaviour towards vulnerable road users at
urban intersections than the visual task. For both S-IVIS tasks, the
percentage of correct responses was highest for the static situation and
lowest when conducted in urban environment and the percentage of
correct responses decreased with increasing task difficulty. In general,
the results suggest that driving with a secondary task in an urban
environment caused some changes in driving behaviour. In particular,
proper interaction with other road users suffered when the driver had a
secondary task.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 121 - 133 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- information systems