Survey of reliability and availability prediction methods from the viewpoint of software architecture

Anne Immonen (Corresponding Author), Eila Niemelä

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

123 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many future software systems will be distributed across a network, extensively providing different kinds of services for their users. These systems must be highly reliable and provide services when required. Reliability and availability must be engineered into software from the onset of its development, and potential problems must be detected in the early stages, when it is easier and less expensive to implement modifications. The software architecture design phase is the first stage of software development in which it is possible to evaluate how well the quality requirements are being met. For this reason, a method is needed for analyzing software architecture with respect to reliability and availability. In this paper, we define a framework for comparing reliability and availability analysis methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. Our contribution is the comparison of the existing analysis methods and techniques that can be used for reliability and availability prediction at the architectural level. The objective is to discover which methods are suitable for the reliability and availability prediction of today’s complex systems, what are the shortcomings of the methods, and which research activities need to be conducted in order to overcome these identified shortcomings. The comparison reveals that none of the existing methods entirely fulfill the requirements that are defined in the framework. The comparison framework also defines the characteristics required of new reliability and availability analysis methods. Additionally, the framework is a valuable tool for selecting the best suitable method for architecture analysis. Furthermore, the framework can be extended and used for other evaluation methods as well.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49 - 65
Number of pages17
JournalSoftware and Systems Modeling
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Software architecture
Software Architecture
Availability
Prediction
Large scale systems
Potential Problems
Software engineering
Requirements
Computer systems
Evaluation Method
Software Development
Software System
Complex Systems
Framework
Software
Evaluate

Keywords

  • Reliability and availability analysis
  • Software architecture
  • Software components

Cite this

@article{18e0462221034c19b9e4a0782f0a8250,
title = "Survey of reliability and availability prediction methods from the viewpoint of software architecture",
abstract = "Many future software systems will be distributed across a network, extensively providing different kinds of services for their users. These systems must be highly reliable and provide services when required. Reliability and availability must be engineered into software from the onset of its development, and potential problems must be detected in the early stages, when it is easier and less expensive to implement modifications. The software architecture design phase is the first stage of software development in which it is possible to evaluate how well the quality requirements are being met. For this reason, a method is needed for analyzing software architecture with respect to reliability and availability. In this paper, we define a framework for comparing reliability and availability analysis methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. Our contribution is the comparison of the existing analysis methods and techniques that can be used for reliability and availability prediction at the architectural level. The objective is to discover which methods are suitable for the reliability and availability prediction of today’s complex systems, what are the shortcomings of the methods, and which research activities need to be conducted in order to overcome these identified shortcomings. The comparison reveals that none of the existing methods entirely fulfill the requirements that are defined in the framework. The comparison framework also defines the characteristics required of new reliability and availability analysis methods. Additionally, the framework is a valuable tool for selecting the best suitable method for architecture analysis. Furthermore, the framework can be extended and used for other evaluation methods as well.",
keywords = "Reliability and availability analysis, Software architecture, Software components",
author = "Anne Immonen and Eila Niemel{\"a}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1007/s10270-006-0040-x",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "49 -- 65",
journal = "Software and Systems Modeling",
issn = "1619-1366",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Survey of reliability and availability prediction methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. / Immonen, Anne (Corresponding Author); Niemelä, Eila.

In: Software and Systems Modeling, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2008, p. 49 - 65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of reliability and availability prediction methods from the viewpoint of software architecture

AU - Immonen, Anne

AU - Niemelä, Eila

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Many future software systems will be distributed across a network, extensively providing different kinds of services for their users. These systems must be highly reliable and provide services when required. Reliability and availability must be engineered into software from the onset of its development, and potential problems must be detected in the early stages, when it is easier and less expensive to implement modifications. The software architecture design phase is the first stage of software development in which it is possible to evaluate how well the quality requirements are being met. For this reason, a method is needed for analyzing software architecture with respect to reliability and availability. In this paper, we define a framework for comparing reliability and availability analysis methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. Our contribution is the comparison of the existing analysis methods and techniques that can be used for reliability and availability prediction at the architectural level. The objective is to discover which methods are suitable for the reliability and availability prediction of today’s complex systems, what are the shortcomings of the methods, and which research activities need to be conducted in order to overcome these identified shortcomings. The comparison reveals that none of the existing methods entirely fulfill the requirements that are defined in the framework. The comparison framework also defines the characteristics required of new reliability and availability analysis methods. Additionally, the framework is a valuable tool for selecting the best suitable method for architecture analysis. Furthermore, the framework can be extended and used for other evaluation methods as well.

AB - Many future software systems will be distributed across a network, extensively providing different kinds of services for their users. These systems must be highly reliable and provide services when required. Reliability and availability must be engineered into software from the onset of its development, and potential problems must be detected in the early stages, when it is easier and less expensive to implement modifications. The software architecture design phase is the first stage of software development in which it is possible to evaluate how well the quality requirements are being met. For this reason, a method is needed for analyzing software architecture with respect to reliability and availability. In this paper, we define a framework for comparing reliability and availability analysis methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. Our contribution is the comparison of the existing analysis methods and techniques that can be used for reliability and availability prediction at the architectural level. The objective is to discover which methods are suitable for the reliability and availability prediction of today’s complex systems, what are the shortcomings of the methods, and which research activities need to be conducted in order to overcome these identified shortcomings. The comparison reveals that none of the existing methods entirely fulfill the requirements that are defined in the framework. The comparison framework also defines the characteristics required of new reliability and availability analysis methods. Additionally, the framework is a valuable tool for selecting the best suitable method for architecture analysis. Furthermore, the framework can be extended and used for other evaluation methods as well.

KW - Reliability and availability analysis

KW - Software architecture

KW - Software components

U2 - 10.1007/s10270-006-0040-x

DO - 10.1007/s10270-006-0040-x

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 49

EP - 65

JO - Software and Systems Modeling

JF - Software and Systems Modeling

SN - 1619-1366

IS - 1

ER -