Telemonitoring and mobile phone-based health coaching among finnish diabetic and heart disease patients: a randomized controlled trial

Tuula Karhula, Anna-Leena Vuorinen, Katja Rääpysjärvi, Mira Pakanen, Pentti Itkonen, Merja Tepponen, Ulla-Maija Junno, Tapio Jokinen, Mark van Gils, Jaakko Lähteenmäki, Kari Kohtamäki, Niilo Saranummi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a strong will and need to find alternative models of health care delivery driven by the ever-increasing burden of chronic diseases. Objective: The purpose of this 1-year trial was to study whether a structured mobile phone-based health coaching program, which was supported by a remote monitoring system, could be used to improve the health-related quality of life (HRQL) and/or the clinical measures of type 2 diabetes and heart disease patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among type 2 diabetes patients and heart disease patients of the South Karelia Social and Health Care District. Patients were recruited by sending invitations to randomly selected patients using the electronic health records system. Health coaches called patients every 4 to 6 weeks and patients were encouraged to self-monitor their weight, blood pressure, blood glucose (diabetics), and steps (heart disease patients) once per week. The primary outcome was HRQL measured by the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among diabetic patients. The clinical measures assessed were blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, and lipid levels. Results: A total of 267 heart patients and 250 diabetes patients started in the trial, of which 246 and 225 patients concluded the end-point assessments, respectively. Withdrawal from the study was associated with the patients' unfamiliarity with mobile phones-of the 41 dropouts, 85% (11/13) of the heart disease patients and 88% (14/16) of the diabetes patients were familiar with mobile phones, whereas the corresponding percentages were 97.1% (231/238) and 98.6% (208/211), respectively, among the rest of the patients (P=.02 and P=.004). Withdrawal was also associated with heart disease patients' comorbidities-40% (8/20) of the dropouts had at least one comorbidity, whereas the corresponding percentage was 18.9% (47/249) among the rest of the patients (P=.02). The intervention showed no statistically significant benefits over the current practice with regard to health-related quality of life-heart disease patients: beta=0.730 (P=.36) for the physical component score and beta=-0.608 (P=.62) for the mental component score; diabetes patients: beta=0.875 (P=.85) for the physical component score and beta=-0.770 (P=.52) for the mental component score. There was a significant difference in waist circumference in the type 2 diabetes group (beta=-1.711, P=.01). There were no differences in any other outcome variables. Conclusions: A health coaching program supported with telemonitoring did not improve heart disease patients' or diabetes patients' quality of life or their clinical condition. There were indications that the intervention had a differential effect on heart patients and diabetes patients. Diabetes patients may be more prone to benefit from this kind of intervention. This should not be neglected when developing new ways for self-management of chronic diseases.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere153
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Cell Phones
Heart Diseases
Randomized Controlled Trials
Health
Mentoring
Quality of Life
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Waist Circumference
Comorbidity
Chronic Disease

Keywords

  • health coaching
  • telemonitoring
  • type2 diabetes
  • heart disease
  • personal health record
  • halt-related quality of life

Cite this

Karhula, Tuula ; Vuorinen, Anna-Leena ; Rääpysjärvi, Katja ; Pakanen, Mira ; Itkonen, Pentti ; Tepponen, Merja ; Junno, Ulla-Maija ; Jokinen, Tapio ; van Gils, Mark ; Lähteenmäki, Jaakko ; Kohtamäki, Kari ; Saranummi, Niilo. / Telemonitoring and mobile phone-based health coaching among finnish diabetic and heart disease patients: a randomized controlled trial. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 6.
@article{96b1f0a470914dbfb7dab8f83ed24e95,
title = "Telemonitoring and mobile phone-based health coaching among finnish diabetic and heart disease patients: a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: There is a strong will and need to find alternative models of health care delivery driven by the ever-increasing burden of chronic diseases. Objective: The purpose of this 1-year trial was to study whether a structured mobile phone-based health coaching program, which was supported by a remote monitoring system, could be used to improve the health-related quality of life (HRQL) and/or the clinical measures of type 2 diabetes and heart disease patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among type 2 diabetes patients and heart disease patients of the South Karelia Social and Health Care District. Patients were recruited by sending invitations to randomly selected patients using the electronic health records system. Health coaches called patients every 4 to 6 weeks and patients were encouraged to self-monitor their weight, blood pressure, blood glucose (diabetics), and steps (heart disease patients) once per week. The primary outcome was HRQL measured by the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among diabetic patients. The clinical measures assessed were blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, and lipid levels. Results: A total of 267 heart patients and 250 diabetes patients started in the trial, of which 246 and 225 patients concluded the end-point assessments, respectively. Withdrawal from the study was associated with the patients' unfamiliarity with mobile phones-of the 41 dropouts, 85{\%} (11/13) of the heart disease patients and 88{\%} (14/16) of the diabetes patients were familiar with mobile phones, whereas the corresponding percentages were 97.1{\%} (231/238) and 98.6{\%} (208/211), respectively, among the rest of the patients (P=.02 and P=.004). Withdrawal was also associated with heart disease patients' comorbidities-40{\%} (8/20) of the dropouts had at least one comorbidity, whereas the corresponding percentage was 18.9{\%} (47/249) among the rest of the patients (P=.02). The intervention showed no statistically significant benefits over the current practice with regard to health-related quality of life-heart disease patients: beta=0.730 (P=.36) for the physical component score and beta=-0.608 (P=.62) for the mental component score; diabetes patients: beta=0.875 (P=.85) for the physical component score and beta=-0.770 (P=.52) for the mental component score. There was a significant difference in waist circumference in the type 2 diabetes group (beta=-1.711, P=.01). There were no differences in any other outcome variables. Conclusions: A health coaching program supported with telemonitoring did not improve heart disease patients' or diabetes patients' quality of life or their clinical condition. There were indications that the intervention had a differential effect on heart patients and diabetes patients. Diabetes patients may be more prone to benefit from this kind of intervention. This should not be neglected when developing new ways for self-management of chronic diseases.",
keywords = "health coaching, telemonitoring, type2 diabetes, heart disease, personal health record, halt-related quality of life",
author = "Tuula Karhula and Anna-Leena Vuorinen and Katja R{\"a}{\"a}pysj{\"a}rvi and Mira Pakanen and Pentti Itkonen and Merja Tepponen and Ulla-Maija Junno and Tapio Jokinen and {van Gils}, Mark and Jaakko L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki and Kari Kohtam{\"a}ki and Niilo Saranummi",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.4059",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "JMIR",
number = "6",

}

Telemonitoring and mobile phone-based health coaching among finnish diabetic and heart disease patients: a randomized controlled trial. / Karhula, Tuula; Vuorinen, Anna-Leena; Rääpysjärvi, Katja; Pakanen, Mira; Itkonen, Pentti; Tepponen, Merja; Junno, Ulla-Maija; Jokinen, Tapio; van Gils, Mark; Lähteenmäki, Jaakko; Kohtamäki, Kari; Saranummi, Niilo.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 17, No. 6, e153, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telemonitoring and mobile phone-based health coaching among finnish diabetic and heart disease patients: a randomized controlled trial

AU - Karhula, Tuula

AU - Vuorinen, Anna-Leena

AU - Rääpysjärvi, Katja

AU - Pakanen, Mira

AU - Itkonen, Pentti

AU - Tepponen, Merja

AU - Junno, Ulla-Maija

AU - Jokinen, Tapio

AU - van Gils, Mark

AU - Lähteenmäki, Jaakko

AU - Kohtamäki, Kari

AU - Saranummi, Niilo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: There is a strong will and need to find alternative models of health care delivery driven by the ever-increasing burden of chronic diseases. Objective: The purpose of this 1-year trial was to study whether a structured mobile phone-based health coaching program, which was supported by a remote monitoring system, could be used to improve the health-related quality of life (HRQL) and/or the clinical measures of type 2 diabetes and heart disease patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among type 2 diabetes patients and heart disease patients of the South Karelia Social and Health Care District. Patients were recruited by sending invitations to randomly selected patients using the electronic health records system. Health coaches called patients every 4 to 6 weeks and patients were encouraged to self-monitor their weight, blood pressure, blood glucose (diabetics), and steps (heart disease patients) once per week. The primary outcome was HRQL measured by the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among diabetic patients. The clinical measures assessed were blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, and lipid levels. Results: A total of 267 heart patients and 250 diabetes patients started in the trial, of which 246 and 225 patients concluded the end-point assessments, respectively. Withdrawal from the study was associated with the patients' unfamiliarity with mobile phones-of the 41 dropouts, 85% (11/13) of the heart disease patients and 88% (14/16) of the diabetes patients were familiar with mobile phones, whereas the corresponding percentages were 97.1% (231/238) and 98.6% (208/211), respectively, among the rest of the patients (P=.02 and P=.004). Withdrawal was also associated with heart disease patients' comorbidities-40% (8/20) of the dropouts had at least one comorbidity, whereas the corresponding percentage was 18.9% (47/249) among the rest of the patients (P=.02). The intervention showed no statistically significant benefits over the current practice with regard to health-related quality of life-heart disease patients: beta=0.730 (P=.36) for the physical component score and beta=-0.608 (P=.62) for the mental component score; diabetes patients: beta=0.875 (P=.85) for the physical component score and beta=-0.770 (P=.52) for the mental component score. There was a significant difference in waist circumference in the type 2 diabetes group (beta=-1.711, P=.01). There were no differences in any other outcome variables. Conclusions: A health coaching program supported with telemonitoring did not improve heart disease patients' or diabetes patients' quality of life or their clinical condition. There were indications that the intervention had a differential effect on heart patients and diabetes patients. Diabetes patients may be more prone to benefit from this kind of intervention. This should not be neglected when developing new ways for self-management of chronic diseases.

AB - Background: There is a strong will and need to find alternative models of health care delivery driven by the ever-increasing burden of chronic diseases. Objective: The purpose of this 1-year trial was to study whether a structured mobile phone-based health coaching program, which was supported by a remote monitoring system, could be used to improve the health-related quality of life (HRQL) and/or the clinical measures of type 2 diabetes and heart disease patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among type 2 diabetes patients and heart disease patients of the South Karelia Social and Health Care District. Patients were recruited by sending invitations to randomly selected patients using the electronic health records system. Health coaches called patients every 4 to 6 weeks and patients were encouraged to self-monitor their weight, blood pressure, blood glucose (diabetics), and steps (heart disease patients) once per week. The primary outcome was HRQL measured by the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among diabetic patients. The clinical measures assessed were blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, and lipid levels. Results: A total of 267 heart patients and 250 diabetes patients started in the trial, of which 246 and 225 patients concluded the end-point assessments, respectively. Withdrawal from the study was associated with the patients' unfamiliarity with mobile phones-of the 41 dropouts, 85% (11/13) of the heart disease patients and 88% (14/16) of the diabetes patients were familiar with mobile phones, whereas the corresponding percentages were 97.1% (231/238) and 98.6% (208/211), respectively, among the rest of the patients (P=.02 and P=.004). Withdrawal was also associated with heart disease patients' comorbidities-40% (8/20) of the dropouts had at least one comorbidity, whereas the corresponding percentage was 18.9% (47/249) among the rest of the patients (P=.02). The intervention showed no statistically significant benefits over the current practice with regard to health-related quality of life-heart disease patients: beta=0.730 (P=.36) for the physical component score and beta=-0.608 (P=.62) for the mental component score; diabetes patients: beta=0.875 (P=.85) for the physical component score and beta=-0.770 (P=.52) for the mental component score. There was a significant difference in waist circumference in the type 2 diabetes group (beta=-1.711, P=.01). There were no differences in any other outcome variables. Conclusions: A health coaching program supported with telemonitoring did not improve heart disease patients' or diabetes patients' quality of life or their clinical condition. There were indications that the intervention had a differential effect on heart patients and diabetes patients. Diabetes patients may be more prone to benefit from this kind of intervention. This should not be neglected when developing new ways for self-management of chronic diseases.

KW - health coaching

KW - telemonitoring

KW - type2 diabetes

KW - heart disease

KW - personal health record

KW - halt-related quality of life

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.4059

DO - 10.2196/jmir.4059

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 6

M1 - e153

ER -