Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ten questions concerning positive energy districts

  • Siddharth Sareen*
  • , Vicky Albert-Seifried
  • , Laura Aelenei
  • , Francesco Reda
  • , Ghazal Etminan
  • , Maria Beatrice Andreucci
  • , Michal Kuzmic
  • , Nienke Maas
  • , Oscar Seco
  • , Paolo Civiero
  • , Savis Gohari
  • , Mari Hukkalainen
  • , Hans Martin Neumann
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • University of Stavanger
    • Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE
    • National Laboratory of Energy and Geology
    • Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT)
    • Sapienza University of Rome
    • Czech Technical University (CTU)
    • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO)
    • Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)
    • Roma Tre University
    • Oslo University College

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

    Abstract

    Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) constitute an emerging energy transition paradigm, with an ambitious timeline for rapid upscaling to match the urgency of climate mitigation and adaptation. Increasingly networked and coordinated actors aim to realise 100 PEDs across Europe by 2025. This resonates with the mission orientation turn of the European Green New Deal, to inspire and enable target-driven innovation. Yet it raises questions that have long perplexed scholars and practitioners in energy transitions: how can rapid diffusion be achieved in a sustained and replicable manner in diverse socio-technical contexts? Identifying the key questions to address and implement fit-to-purpose solutions within short-term project timescales is essential in order to mainstream PEDs. Such solutionism must be accompanied by a healthy dose of scepticism, in order to avoid undesirable outcomes such as exacerbated inequalities, societal backlash, and spatial displacement of invisible burdens. But it also requires proactive sharing of experiences, responsive learning and dissemination, and cooperation across sectors and disciplines. In this timely contribution, thirteen researchers from nine European countries flag ten questions concerning PEDs, and offer preliminary responses in line with cutting-edge insights informed by science and practice. This contribution draws on multidisciplinary competence in steering the Positive Energy Districts European Network, and aims to make emerging knowledge widely available, while also inviting constructive critique and engagement within the PED arena which features a broad range of diverse stakeholders. Authors highlight key pathways forward for a rapid, far-reaching translation of the ambitious PEDs agenda into multi-sited, district-scale beacons of sustainable energy transition.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number109017
    JournalBuilding and Environment
    Volume216
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2022
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Funding

    This article is based upon work from COST Action 19126 Positive Energy Districts European Network PED-EU-NET, supported by COST. Siddharth Sareen acknowledges support from JPI Climate and the Research Council of Norway (321421 ROLES). Michal Kuzmic acknowledges support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme (864242 , SPARCS).

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

    Keywords

    • District-scale
    • Engagement
    • Inequalities
    • Interdisciplinary
    • PEDs
    • Socio-technical transitions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ten questions concerning positive energy districts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this