Abstract
When the Fukushima accident occurred in March 2011,
Finland was at the height of a nuclear renaissance,
with the Government's decision-in-principle in 2010 to
allow construction of two new nuclear reactors.
This article examines the nuclear power debate in Finland
after Fukushima. We deploy the concepts of
(de)politicisation and hyperpoliticisation in the
analysis of articles in the country's main newspaper. Our
analysis indicates that Finnish nuclear exceptionalism
manifested in the safety-related depoliticising and the
nation's prosperity-related hyperpoliticisation arguments
of the pro-nuclear camp. The anti-nuclear camp
used politicisation strategies, such as economic
arguments, to show the unprofitability of nuclear power.
The Fukushima accident had a clear effect on Finnish
nuclear policy: the government programme of 2011
excluded the nuclear new build. However, in 2014 the
majority of Parliament again supported nuclear
power. Hence, the period after Fukushima until 2014 could
be described as continued but undermined
loyalty to nuclear power.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 260-274 |
Journal | Public Understanding of Science |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2017 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- (de)politicisation
- Finland
- Fukushima
- nuclear power debate