Abstract
Fracture toughness values obtained from standardized
tests, with strict specimen size requirements to produce
specimen size independent results, are used in the
process of fracture toughness assessment of structural
components. Often results from the standardized tests can
not be applied to real flaws due to different flaw
geometries in test specimen and structure or the
properties of the examined material are such that strict
specimen size requirements of the standards are in
practise impossible to fulfill. In both cases the main
cause to problems arises from combined constraint
characteristics of the flaw and specimen type.
In this study a wide range of specimen and flaw
dimensions were examined both by experimental tests and
computational finite element analysis for constraint
assessment. The methods for taking into account specimen
and flaw dimensions are introduced and applied to
investigated configurations. These methods include
constraint correction or indexing methods, namely
T-stress, Q-parameter and small-scale yielding correction
(SSYC) and statistical treatment for specimen size effect
in case of cleavage fracture. Experimentally studied
configurations were Charpy-size impact specimens with a/W
ranging from 0.05 to 0.5, static 3-point-bend (3PB)
specimens with thickness ranging from 5 to 300 mm and
plates in 4-point-bending (4PB) with elliptical surface
cracks on the tension side. All flaws were fatigue
precracked. Computationally analysed configurations
included 3-dimensional surface-edge notched 3PB specimens
(SE(B)) with deep (a/W = 0.5) and shallow (a/W = 0.1)
crack configurations and compact tension (CT) specimens
with a/W = 0.6. The W/B ratios for SE(B) and CT specimens
were 1, 2 and 4. The W/B = 2 configuration was also
analysed as side grooved. The strain hardening exponent
(n) of the deformation plasticity material model had
values 5, 10 and 20. Computationally analysed were also
two sizes of elliptical surface cracks in a 4PB plate
with material strain hardening exponent n = 10. For the
4PB plates a formula for fracture toughness (Jc)
calculation was proposed.
The conducted 3-dimensional finite element analyses of
the cracked configurations were more detailed than any
analysis in previously published literature. Thus
analyses revealed a great deal of new information of the
in-plane constraint behaviour inside the specimen.
Toughness scaling models (= SSYC) and J-Q trajectories
were created and their evolution as functions of specimen
dimensions, material hardening properties and applied
loading were investigated. The SSYC and J-Q approach were
found to describe constraint properties adequately. This
finding received partial verification from the
experimental tests, where SSYC was found to be superior
in comparison to Q-parameter and T-stress. The
statistical treatment for specimen thickness description
was very promising and a development for that method was
proposed.
Based on the results, the differences in apparent
fracture toughness values obtained from various different
specimen configurations can be better understood and
taken into account.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor Degree |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 1 Jul 1997 |
Place of Publication | Espoo |
Publisher | |
Print ISBNs | 951-38-5064-1 |
Publication status | Published - 1997 |
MoE publication type | G4 Doctoral dissertation (monograph) |
Keywords
- fractures (materials)
- cracking (fracturing)
- fracture tests
- fracture strength
- finite element analysis
- flaw inspection