The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)365 - 380
    Number of pages16
    JournalEngineering Fracture Mechanics
    Volume67
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Cracks

    Keywords

    • engineering treatment model
    • fracture parameter
    • structural integrity
    • failure assessment diagram
    • driving force
    • ProperTune

    Cite this

    @article{d3fbf972c37646a0946cf6444a672d47,
    title = "The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3",
    abstract = "The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.",
    keywords = "engineering treatment model, fracture parameter, structural integrity, failure assessment diagram, driving force, ProperTune",
    author = "Anssi Laukkanen",
    note = "Project code: V7SU00063",
    year = "2000",
    doi = "10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "67",
    pages = "365 -- 380",
    journal = "Engineering Fracture Mechanics",
    issn = "0013-7944",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "4",

    }

    The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3. / Laukkanen, Anssi.

    In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 67, No. 4, 2000, p. 365 - 380.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

    AU - Laukkanen, Anssi

    N1 - Project code: V7SU00063

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.

    AB - The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.

    KW - engineering treatment model

    KW - fracture parameter

    KW - structural integrity

    KW - failure assessment diagram

    KW - driving force

    KW - ProperTune

    U2 - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

    DO - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 67

    SP - 365

    EP - 380

    JO - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

    JF - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

    SN - 0013-7944

    IS - 4

    ER -