The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

Anssi Laukkanen

doi:10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

Anssi Laukkanen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	365 - 380
Number of pages	16
Journal	Engineering Fracture Mechanics
Volume	67
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1
Publication status	Published - 2000
MoE publication type	A1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

engineering treatment model
fracture parameter
structural integrity
failure assessment diagram
driving force
ProperTune

Access to Document

10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

Cite this

@article{d3fbf972c37646a0946cf6444a672d47,

title = "The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3",

abstract = "The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.",

keywords = "engineering treatment model, fracture parameter, structural integrity, failure assessment diagram, driving force, ProperTune",

author = "Anssi Laukkanen",

note = "Project code: V7SU00063",

year = "2000",

doi = "10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1",

language = "English",

volume = "67",

pages = "365 -- 380",

journal = "Engineering Fracture Mechanics",

issn = "0013-7944",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

AU - Laukkanen, Anssi

N1 - Project code: V7SU00063

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.

AB - The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.

KW - engineering treatment model

KW - fracture parameter

KW - structural integrity

KW - failure assessment diagram

KW - driving force

KW - ProperTune

U2 - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

DO - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

M3 - Article

SN - 0013-7944

VL - 67

SP - 365

EP - 380

JO - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

JF - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

IS - 4

ER -

The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this