The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365 - 380
Number of pages16
JournalEngineering Fracture Mechanics
Volume67
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Cracks

Keywords

  • engineering treatment model
  • fracture parameter
  • structural integrity
  • failure assessment diagram
  • driving force
  • ProperTune

Cite this

@article{d3fbf972c37646a0946cf6444a672d47,
title = "The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3",
abstract = "The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.",
keywords = "engineering treatment model, fracture parameter, structural integrity, failure assessment diagram, driving force, ProperTune",
author = "Anssi Laukkanen",
note = "Project code: V7SU00063",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "365 -- 380",
journal = "Engineering Fracture Mechanics",
issn = "0013-7944",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3. / Laukkanen, Anssi.

In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 67, No. 4, 2000, p. 365 - 380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

AU - Laukkanen, Anssi

N1 - Project code: V7SU00063

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.

AB - The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.

KW - engineering treatment model

KW - fracture parameter

KW - structural integrity

KW - failure assessment diagram

KW - driving force

KW - ProperTune

U2 - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

DO - 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00063-1

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 365

EP - 380

JO - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

JF - Engineering Fracture Mechanics

SN - 0013-7944

IS - 4

ER -