The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The formalism presented in the engineering treatment model (ETM) as well as the background of the method are assessed. Special attention is focused on different assumptions and properties of the ETM. The validity and use in an engineering fracture analysis is considered, and the ETM is compared to R6 revision 3 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) options 1 and 2. A discussion concerning the usability of ETM and its possible deficiencies is presented. The comparison presents the similitude between the crack driving force estimates of the ETM and FAD treatments based on the R6 method.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)365 - 380
    Number of pages16
    JournalEngineering Fracture Mechanics
    Volume67
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Keywords

    • engineering treatment model
    • fracture parameter
    • structural integrity
    • failure assessment diagram
    • driving force
    • ProperTune

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The engineering treatment model and comparison to R6 revision 3'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this