The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities

Intermediate report of HUMAX project

Pia Oedewald, Ann Britt Skjerve, Christer Axelsson, Kaupo Viitanen, Elina Pietikäinen, Teemu Reiman

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

Abstract

In recent years most Nordic nuclear power plants have implemented so called human performance programmes. The programmes typically apply predefined human performance tools (HU tools) to maximize failure free operations by preventing human errors. Despite the prominence of human performance programmes, there is little research on the basic premises behind them and the concrete beneficial effects from using HU tools remain elusive. This document describes the intermediate results of a Nordic research project HUMAX which aims at providing knowledge of the impacts of the human performance programmes and to support the designing and implementing effective HU tools. The focus is on maintenance activities. In 2013 HUMAX project carried out three case studies in Nordic NPP maintenance organisations and studied the expected and experienced benefits of HU tools. Furthermore HUMAX disseminated an international survey to human performance experts around the world to gain more insight into the motives, benefits and disadvantages of the programmes. The study is ongoing and the results presented in this report are preliminary. The results show that often the espoused goal of a human performance programme is to prevent events by reducing errors. However, the interviews indicate that maintenance personnel associate many other benefits to the HU tools than reduced number of events. Smooth execution of work tasks, less rework and smaller occupational injury risk were often mentioned as practical benefits. The benefits also included indirect safety improvements: more rigorous work practices and shared knowledge on work tasks and risks. Many of the practices have been used at the Nordic plants for a long time and there were questions why they are now labelled as HU tools and promoted with a programme. Despite of that, maintenance personnel held fairly positive view on the HU tools. However, a common opinion was that using the HU tools may require a lot of time. Further, strong focus on the tools may decrease the focus on tasks itself and impair the workers attention or judgement. In the Nordic plants HU tools were also sometimes perceived as awkward, and feelings of shame and blame may occur. Thus, the results highlight the importance of the implementation process, the way the HU tools are argued and promoted in the organisations.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationRoskilde
Number of pages62
Publication statusPublished - 2014
MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

Publication series

NameNKS Nordic nuclear safety research
PublisherNordisk Kernesikkerhedsforskning
Volume300

Fingerprint

Nuclear power plants
Occupational risks
Personnel
Concretes

Keywords

  • human performance tools
  • human error
  • nuclear safety

Cite this

Oedewald, P., Skjerve, A. B., Axelsson, C., Viitanen, K., Pietikäinen, E., & Reiman, T. (2014). The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities: Intermediate report of HUMAX project. Roskilde. NKS Nordic nuclear safety research, Vol.. 300
Oedewald, Pia ; Skjerve, Ann Britt ; Axelsson, Christer ; Viitanen, Kaupo ; Pietikäinen, Elina ; Reiman, Teemu. / The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities : Intermediate report of HUMAX project. Roskilde, 2014. 62 p. (NKS Nordic nuclear safety research, Vol. 300).
@book{e91c4d1ad12e4722918117feccabfda7,
title = "The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities: Intermediate report of HUMAX project",
abstract = "In recent years most Nordic nuclear power plants have implemented so called human performance programmes. The programmes typically apply predefined human performance tools (HU tools) to maximize failure free operations by preventing human errors. Despite the prominence of human performance programmes, there is little research on the basic premises behind them and the concrete beneficial effects from using HU tools remain elusive. This document describes the intermediate results of a Nordic research project HUMAX which aims at providing knowledge of the impacts of the human performance programmes and to support the designing and implementing effective HU tools. The focus is on maintenance activities. In 2013 HUMAX project carried out three case studies in Nordic NPP maintenance organisations and studied the expected and experienced benefits of HU tools. Furthermore HUMAX disseminated an international survey to human performance experts around the world to gain more insight into the motives, benefits and disadvantages of the programmes. The study is ongoing and the results presented in this report are preliminary. The results show that often the espoused goal of a human performance programme is to prevent events by reducing errors. However, the interviews indicate that maintenance personnel associate many other benefits to the HU tools than reduced number of events. Smooth execution of work tasks, less rework and smaller occupational injury risk were often mentioned as practical benefits. The benefits also included indirect safety improvements: more rigorous work practices and shared knowledge on work tasks and risks. Many of the practices have been used at the Nordic plants for a long time and there were questions why they are now labelled as HU tools and promoted with a programme. Despite of that, maintenance personnel held fairly positive view on the HU tools. However, a common opinion was that using the HU tools may require a lot of time. Further, strong focus on the tools may decrease the focus on tasks itself and impair the workers attention or judgement. In the Nordic plants HU tools were also sometimes perceived as awkward, and feelings of shame and blame may occur. Thus, the results highlight the importance of the implementation process, the way the HU tools are argued and promoted in the organisations.",
keywords = "human performance tools, human error, nuclear safety",
author = "Pia Oedewald and Skjerve, {Ann Britt} and Christer Axelsson and Kaupo Viitanen and Elina Pietik{\"a}inen and Teemu Reiman",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-87-7893-376-8",
series = "NKS Nordic nuclear safety research",
publisher = "Nordisk Kernesikkerhedsforskning",

}

Oedewald, P, Skjerve, AB, Axelsson, C, Viitanen, K, Pietikäinen, E & Reiman, T 2014, The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities: Intermediate report of HUMAX project. NKS Nordic nuclear safety research, vol. 300, Roskilde.

The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities : Intermediate report of HUMAX project. / Oedewald, Pia; Skjerve, Ann Britt; Axelsson, Christer; Viitanen, Kaupo; Pietikäinen, Elina; Reiman, Teemu.

Roskilde, 2014. 62 p. (NKS Nordic nuclear safety research, Vol. 300).

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities

T2 - Intermediate report of HUMAX project

AU - Oedewald, Pia

AU - Skjerve, Ann Britt

AU - Axelsson, Christer

AU - Viitanen, Kaupo

AU - Pietikäinen, Elina

AU - Reiman, Teemu

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In recent years most Nordic nuclear power plants have implemented so called human performance programmes. The programmes typically apply predefined human performance tools (HU tools) to maximize failure free operations by preventing human errors. Despite the prominence of human performance programmes, there is little research on the basic premises behind them and the concrete beneficial effects from using HU tools remain elusive. This document describes the intermediate results of a Nordic research project HUMAX which aims at providing knowledge of the impacts of the human performance programmes and to support the designing and implementing effective HU tools. The focus is on maintenance activities. In 2013 HUMAX project carried out three case studies in Nordic NPP maintenance organisations and studied the expected and experienced benefits of HU tools. Furthermore HUMAX disseminated an international survey to human performance experts around the world to gain more insight into the motives, benefits and disadvantages of the programmes. The study is ongoing and the results presented in this report are preliminary. The results show that often the espoused goal of a human performance programme is to prevent events by reducing errors. However, the interviews indicate that maintenance personnel associate many other benefits to the HU tools than reduced number of events. Smooth execution of work tasks, less rework and smaller occupational injury risk were often mentioned as practical benefits. The benefits also included indirect safety improvements: more rigorous work practices and shared knowledge on work tasks and risks. Many of the practices have been used at the Nordic plants for a long time and there were questions why they are now labelled as HU tools and promoted with a programme. Despite of that, maintenance personnel held fairly positive view on the HU tools. However, a common opinion was that using the HU tools may require a lot of time. Further, strong focus on the tools may decrease the focus on tasks itself and impair the workers attention or judgement. In the Nordic plants HU tools were also sometimes perceived as awkward, and feelings of shame and blame may occur. Thus, the results highlight the importance of the implementation process, the way the HU tools are argued and promoted in the organisations.

AB - In recent years most Nordic nuclear power plants have implemented so called human performance programmes. The programmes typically apply predefined human performance tools (HU tools) to maximize failure free operations by preventing human errors. Despite the prominence of human performance programmes, there is little research on the basic premises behind them and the concrete beneficial effects from using HU tools remain elusive. This document describes the intermediate results of a Nordic research project HUMAX which aims at providing knowledge of the impacts of the human performance programmes and to support the designing and implementing effective HU tools. The focus is on maintenance activities. In 2013 HUMAX project carried out three case studies in Nordic NPP maintenance organisations and studied the expected and experienced benefits of HU tools. Furthermore HUMAX disseminated an international survey to human performance experts around the world to gain more insight into the motives, benefits and disadvantages of the programmes. The study is ongoing and the results presented in this report are preliminary. The results show that often the espoused goal of a human performance programme is to prevent events by reducing errors. However, the interviews indicate that maintenance personnel associate many other benefits to the HU tools than reduced number of events. Smooth execution of work tasks, less rework and smaller occupational injury risk were often mentioned as practical benefits. The benefits also included indirect safety improvements: more rigorous work practices and shared knowledge on work tasks and risks. Many of the practices have been used at the Nordic plants for a long time and there were questions why they are now labelled as HU tools and promoted with a programme. Despite of that, maintenance personnel held fairly positive view on the HU tools. However, a common opinion was that using the HU tools may require a lot of time. Further, strong focus on the tools may decrease the focus on tasks itself and impair the workers attention or judgement. In the Nordic plants HU tools were also sometimes perceived as awkward, and feelings of shame and blame may occur. Thus, the results highlight the importance of the implementation process, the way the HU tools are argued and promoted in the organisations.

KW - human performance tools

KW - human error

KW - nuclear safety

M3 - Report

SN - 978-87-7893-376-8

T3 - NKS Nordic nuclear safety research

BT - The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities

CY - Roskilde

ER -

Oedewald P, Skjerve AB, Axelsson C, Viitanen K, Pietikäinen E, Reiman T. The expected and experienced benefits of Human performance tools in nuclear power plant maintenance activities: Intermediate report of HUMAX project. Roskilde, 2014. 62 p. (NKS Nordic nuclear safety research, Vol. 300).