Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The fourth phase of the radiative transfer model intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Actual canopy scenarios and conformity testing

  • Jean Luc Widlowski
  • , Corrado Mio
  • , Mathias Disney
  • , Jennifer Adams
  • , Ioannis Andredakis
  • , Clement Atzberger
  • , James Brennan
  • , Lorenzo Busetto
  • , Michaël Chelle
  • , Guido Ceccherini
  • , Roberto Colombo
  • , Jean Francois Côté
  • , Alo Eenmäe
  • , Richard Essery
  • , Jean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
  • , Nadine Gobron*
  • , Eloi Grau
  • , Vanessa Haverd
  • , Lucie Homolová
  • , Huaguo Huang
  • Linda Hunt, Hideki Kobayashi, Benjamin Koetz, Andres Kuusk, Joel Kuusk, Mait Lang, Philip E. Lewis, Jennifer L. Lovell, Zbyněk Malenovský, Michele Meroni, Felix Morsdorf, Matti Mõttus, Wenge Ni-Meister, Bernard Pinty, Miina Rautiainen, Martin Schlerf, Ben Somers, Jan Stuckens, Michel M. Verstraete, Wenze Yang, Feng Zhao, Terenzio Zenone
*Corresponding author for this work
  • European Commission
  • University College London
  • University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU)
  • National Research Council (CNR)
  • French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA)
  • University of Milan
  • Natural Resources Canada
  • Estonian University of Life Sciences
  • Tartu Observatory
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Beijing Forestry University
  • Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI)
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
  • European Space Agency (ESA)
  • University of Wollongong
  • University of Zurich
  • University of Helsinki
  • City University of New York
  • Aalto University
  • Centre de Recherche Public-Gabriel Lippmann (GRP-GL)
  • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
  • Merkator NV/SA
  • South African National Space Agency (SANSA)
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • Beihang University
  • University of Antwerp
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  • Centre D’Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphere (CESBIO)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The RAdiative transfer Model Intercomparison (RAMI) activity focuses on the benchmarking of canopy radiative transfer (RT) models. For the current fourth phase of RAMI, six highly realistic virtual plant environments were constructed on the basis of intensive field data collected from (both deciduous and coniferous) forest stands as well as test sites in Europe and South Africa. Twelve RT modelling groups provided simulations of canopy scale (directional and hemispherically integrated) radiative quantities, as well as a series of binary hemispherical photographs acquired from different locations within the virtual canopies. The simulation results showed much greater variance than those recently analysed for the abstract canopy scenarios of RAMI-IV. Canopy complexity is among the most likely drivers behind operator induced errors that gave rise to the discrepancies. Conformity testing was introduced to separate the simulation results into acceptable and non-acceptable contributions. More specifically, a shared risk approach is used to evaluate the compliance of RT model simulations on the basis of reference data generated with the weighted ensemble averaging technique from ISO-13528. However, using concepts from legal metrology, the uncertainty of this reference solution will be shown to prevent a confident assessment of model performance with respect to the selected tolerance intervals. As an alternative, guarded risk decision rules will be presented to account explicitly for the uncertainty associated with the reference and candidate methods. Both guarded acceptance and guarded rejection approaches are used to make confident statements about the acceptance and/or rejection of RT model simulations with respect to the predefined tolerance intervals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)418-437
Number of pages20
JournalRemote Sensing of Environment
Volume169
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

This study would not have been possible without the continuing support of A. Belward, head of the Land Resources Monitoring unit, at the Institute for Environment and Sustainability of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre in Ispra, Italy. A special thank you must also go to M. Buzica and M. Gerboles who clarified the first authors' understanding of both equivalence and compliance testing in the context of European ambient air quality directives. The technical support of M. Robustelli, as well as the contributions of J. Písek and T. Lükk for the test site characterizations, are also greatly appreciated. The field work at Järvselja was funded by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (target financing) as well as by Estonian Science Foundation grants.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • 3D virtual plant canopy
  • Conformity testing
  • Digital hemispherical photography
  • GCOS
  • Guarded acceptance
  • ISO-13528
  • Model benchmarking
  • Optical remote sensing
  • Radiative transfer
  • Shared risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The fourth phase of the radiative transfer model intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Actual canopy scenarios and conformity testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this