The global inventor gap: Distribution and equality of world-wide inventive effort, 1990-2010

Hannes Toivanen, Arho Suominen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Applying distance-to-frontier analysis, we have used 2.9 million patents and population data to assess whether the relative capacity of world countries and major regions to create new knowledge and technology has become globally more equal or less equal between 1990 and 2010. We show with the Gini coefficient that the global distribution of inventors has become more equal between major countries and regions. However, this trend has been largely due to the improved performance of only two major countries, China and India. The worst performing regions, totalling a population of almost 2 billion, are actually falling behind. Our results suggest that substantial parts of the global population have fallen further behind countries at the global frontier in their ability to create new knowledge and inventions, and that the catch-up among the least developed and middle-income countries is highly uneven, prompting questions about the nature and future of the global knowledge economy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0122098
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Inventors
    Patents and inventions
    Accidental Falls
    Population
    Patents
    patents
    India
    China
    income
    Technology

    Keywords

    • globalization
    • development
    • technology
    • inventors
    • patents
    • catch-up
    • knowledge
    • economy
    • equality

    Cite this

    @article{18c89a8d20474d979bfa327e04967be2,
    title = "The global inventor gap: Distribution and equality of world-wide inventive effort, 1990-2010",
    abstract = "Applying distance-to-frontier analysis, we have used 2.9 million patents and population data to assess whether the relative capacity of world countries and major regions to create new knowledge and technology has become globally more equal or less equal between 1990 and 2010. We show with the Gini coefficient that the global distribution of inventors has become more equal between major countries and regions. However, this trend has been largely due to the improved performance of only two major countries, China and India. The worst performing regions, totalling a population of almost 2 billion, are actually falling behind. Our results suggest that substantial parts of the global population have fallen further behind countries at the global frontier in their ability to create new knowledge and inventions, and that the catch-up among the least developed and middle-income countries is highly uneven, prompting questions about the nature and future of the global knowledge economy.",
    keywords = "globalization, development, technology, inventors, patents, catch-up, knowledge, economy, equality",
    author = "Hannes Toivanen and Arho Suominen",
    note = "Project code: 86243",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0122098",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    journal = "PLoS ONE",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science",
    number = "4",

    }

    The global inventor gap: Distribution and equality of world-wide inventive effort, 1990-2010. / Toivanen, Hannes; Suominen, Arho.

    In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 10, No. 4, e0122098, 2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The global inventor gap: Distribution and equality of world-wide inventive effort, 1990-2010

    AU - Toivanen, Hannes

    AU - Suominen, Arho

    N1 - Project code: 86243

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Applying distance-to-frontier analysis, we have used 2.9 million patents and population data to assess whether the relative capacity of world countries and major regions to create new knowledge and technology has become globally more equal or less equal between 1990 and 2010. We show with the Gini coefficient that the global distribution of inventors has become more equal between major countries and regions. However, this trend has been largely due to the improved performance of only two major countries, China and India. The worst performing regions, totalling a population of almost 2 billion, are actually falling behind. Our results suggest that substantial parts of the global population have fallen further behind countries at the global frontier in their ability to create new knowledge and inventions, and that the catch-up among the least developed and middle-income countries is highly uneven, prompting questions about the nature and future of the global knowledge economy.

    AB - Applying distance-to-frontier analysis, we have used 2.9 million patents and population data to assess whether the relative capacity of world countries and major regions to create new knowledge and technology has become globally more equal or less equal between 1990 and 2010. We show with the Gini coefficient that the global distribution of inventors has become more equal between major countries and regions. However, this trend has been largely due to the improved performance of only two major countries, China and India. The worst performing regions, totalling a population of almost 2 billion, are actually falling behind. Our results suggest that substantial parts of the global population have fallen further behind countries at the global frontier in their ability to create new knowledge and inventions, and that the catch-up among the least developed and middle-income countries is highly uneven, prompting questions about the nature and future of the global knowledge economy.

    KW - globalization

    KW - development

    KW - technology

    KW - inventors

    KW - patents

    KW - catch-up

    KW - knowledge

    KW - economy

    KW - equality

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0122098

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0122098

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    JO - PLoS ONE

    JF - PLoS ONE

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 4

    M1 - e0122098

    ER -