The impacts of research field evaluations on research practice

Terttu Luukkonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper surveys the impacts on the direction of research and scientists' working and publishing habits of a particular type of research policy initiative, research field evaluations commissioned by Research Councils in four Nordic countries. The data are based on interviews with approximately 90 scientists and scholars who had been subject to evaluation. The paper draws attention to differences of impacts between fields according to their type (disciplinary versus hybrid fields). A major finding is that the impacts were minimal. Nevertheless, the evaluated scientists had a positive view of the usefulness of the evaluations. They emphasized the value of the evaluations for the allocation of funds and for ‘keeping science straight’ by internal quality control. The paper highlights that these evaluations had multiple purposes and uses. It finishes with some overall conclusions of the impacts of these evaluations from the point of view of both the Research Councils and the evaluated scientists.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349 - 365
JournalResearch Policy
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995
MoE publication typeB1 Article in a scientific magazine

Fingerprint

Quality control
Field research
Evaluation
Habit
Research policy
Nordic countries
Usefulness

Cite this

Luukkonen, Terttu. / The impacts of research field evaluations on research practice. In: Research Policy. 1995 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 349 - 365.
@article{b01194f6c8de4e57980da8bb29a46e08,
title = "The impacts of research field evaluations on research practice",
abstract = "This paper surveys the impacts on the direction of research and scientists' working and publishing habits of a particular type of research policy initiative, research field evaluations commissioned by Research Councils in four Nordic countries. The data are based on interviews with approximately 90 scientists and scholars who had been subject to evaluation. The paper draws attention to differences of impacts between fields according to their type (disciplinary versus hybrid fields). A major finding is that the impacts were minimal. Nevertheless, the evaluated scientists had a positive view of the usefulness of the evaluations. They emphasized the value of the evaluations for the allocation of funds and for ‘keeping science straight’ by internal quality control. The paper highlights that these evaluations had multiple purposes and uses. It finishes with some overall conclusions of the impacts of these evaluations from the point of view of both the Research Councils and the evaluated scientists.",
author = "Terttu Luukkonen",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0048-7333(93)00770-T",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "349 -- 365",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

The impacts of research field evaluations on research practice. / Luukkonen, Terttu.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1995, p. 349 - 365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientific

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impacts of research field evaluations on research practice

AU - Luukkonen, Terttu

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - This paper surveys the impacts on the direction of research and scientists' working and publishing habits of a particular type of research policy initiative, research field evaluations commissioned by Research Councils in four Nordic countries. The data are based on interviews with approximately 90 scientists and scholars who had been subject to evaluation. The paper draws attention to differences of impacts between fields according to their type (disciplinary versus hybrid fields). A major finding is that the impacts were minimal. Nevertheless, the evaluated scientists had a positive view of the usefulness of the evaluations. They emphasized the value of the evaluations for the allocation of funds and for ‘keeping science straight’ by internal quality control. The paper highlights that these evaluations had multiple purposes and uses. It finishes with some overall conclusions of the impacts of these evaluations from the point of view of both the Research Councils and the evaluated scientists.

AB - This paper surveys the impacts on the direction of research and scientists' working and publishing habits of a particular type of research policy initiative, research field evaluations commissioned by Research Councils in four Nordic countries. The data are based on interviews with approximately 90 scientists and scholars who had been subject to evaluation. The paper draws attention to differences of impacts between fields according to their type (disciplinary versus hybrid fields). A major finding is that the impacts were minimal. Nevertheless, the evaluated scientists had a positive view of the usefulness of the evaluations. They emphasized the value of the evaluations for the allocation of funds and for ‘keeping science straight’ by internal quality control. The paper highlights that these evaluations had multiple purposes and uses. It finishes with some overall conclusions of the impacts of these evaluations from the point of view of both the Research Councils and the evaluated scientists.

U2 - 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00770-T

DO - 10.1016/0048-7333(93)00770-T

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 349

EP - 365

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 3

ER -