The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013

Sara Torregrosa-Hetland (Corresponding Author), Antti Pelkonen, Juha Oksanen, Astrid Kander

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55% of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65% by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1373-1384
    Number of pages12
    JournalResearch Policy
    Volume48
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Fingerprint

    Innovation
    Finland
    Sweden
    Macros

    Keywords

    • Impact
    • Innovation
    • Innovation policy
    • Literature based innovation output (LBIO) method
    • Public policy

    Cite this

    Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara ; Pelkonen, Antti ; Oksanen, Juha ; Kander, Astrid. / The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. In: Research Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 1373-1384.
    @article{07049fbe10d44426ad0c589bb4821706,
    title = "The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013",
    abstract = "While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55{\%} of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65{\%} by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.",
    keywords = "Impact, Innovation, Innovation policy, Literature based innovation output (LBIO) method, Public policy",
    author = "Sara Torregrosa-Hetland and Antti Pelkonen and Juha Oksanen and Astrid Kander",
    year = "2019",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "48",
    pages = "1373--1384",
    journal = "Research Policy",
    issn = "0048-7333",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "6",

    }

    The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. / Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara (Corresponding Author); Pelkonen, Antti; Oksanen, Juha; Kander, Astrid.

    In: Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 6, 01.07.2019, p. 1373-1384.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013

    AU - Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara

    AU - Pelkonen, Antti

    AU - Oksanen, Juha

    AU - Kander, Astrid

    PY - 2019/7/1

    Y1 - 2019/7/1

    N2 - While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55% of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65% by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.

    AB - While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55% of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65% by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.

    KW - Impact

    KW - Innovation

    KW - Innovation policy

    KW - Literature based innovation output (LBIO) method

    KW - Public policy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061655549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85061655549

    VL - 48

    SP - 1373

    EP - 1384

    JO - Research Policy

    JF - Research Policy

    SN - 0048-7333

    IS - 6

    ER -