The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013

Sara Torregrosa-Hetland (Corresponding Author), Antti Pelkonen, Juha Oksanen, Astrid Kander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55% of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65% by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1373-1384
Number of pages12
JournalResearch Policy
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Innovation
Finland
Sweden
Macros

Keywords

  • Impact
  • Innovation
  • Innovation policy
  • Literature based innovation output (LBIO) method
  • Public policy

Cite this

Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara ; Pelkonen, Antti ; Oksanen, Juha ; Kander, Astrid. / The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. In: Research Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 1373-1384.
@article{07049fbe10d44426ad0c589bb4821706,
title = "The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013",
abstract = "While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55{\%} of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65{\%} by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.",
keywords = "Impact, Innovation, Innovation policy, Literature based innovation output (LBIO) method, Public policy",
author = "Sara Torregrosa-Hetland and Antti Pelkonen and Juha Oksanen and Astrid Kander",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1373--1384",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. / Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara (Corresponding Author); Pelkonen, Antti; Oksanen, Juha; Kander, Astrid.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 48, No. 6, 01.07.2019, p. 1373-1384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013

AU - Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara

AU - Pelkonen, Antti

AU - Oksanen, Juha

AU - Kander, Astrid

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55% of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65% by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.

AB - While the role played by the state in stimulating innovation in the private sector has been a prevalent interest in innovation research, studies analysing the impacts of public interventions have usually focused on individual policies, programs or projects. Public stimulation is hence often studied from a relatively restricted and temporarily confined perspective, leaving a macro-level and longer-term perspective unrecognized. This article provides further evidence on the matter by examining how many innovations in Finland and Sweden have been publicly stimulated through funding or research collaboration, over a period of more than four decades (1970–2013). Our main source is a new innovation database constructed following the Literature Based Innovation Output (LBIO) method, which gathers the most significant innovations of both countries for the study period, totalling approximately 4100 Swedish and 2600 Finnish innovations. Our results indicate that the public sector has played a very prominent role in stimulating private innovation in both countries, and with an increasing trend. This is especially true for Finland, where 35–55% of the innovations of the period have been stimulated by public funding and 25–65% by collaboration with public research. In Sweden, the share of publicly stimulated innovations has been somewhat lower and erratic, but has increased over time.

KW - Impact

KW - Innovation

KW - Innovation policy

KW - Literature based innovation output (LBIO) method

KW - Public policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061655549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061655549

VL - 48

SP - 1373

EP - 1384

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 6

ER -