The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices

Wen-Ruey Chang, Raoul Grönqvist, Sylvie Leclercq, Robert Brungraber, Ulrich Mattke, Lennart Strandberg, Steve Thorpe, Rohae Myung, Lasse Makkonen, Theodore Courtney

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    102 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper seeks to address questions related to friction measurement such as how friction is related to human-centred assessment and actual slipping, and how repeatable friction measurements are. Commonly used devices for slipperiness measurement are surveyed and their characteristics compared with suggested test conditions from biomechanical observations summarized in Part 1. The issues of device validity, repeatability, reproducibility and usability are examined from the published literature. Friction assessment using the mechanical measurement devices described appears generally valid and reliable. However, the validity of most devices could be improved by bringing them within the range of human slipping conditions observed in biomechanical studies. Future studies should clearly describe the performance limitations of any device and its results and should consider whether the device conditions reflect these actual human slipping conditions. There is also a need for validation studies of more devices by walking experiments.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1233-1261
    Number of pages29
    JournalErgonomics
    Volume44
    Issue number13
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Friction
    Equipment and Supplies
    Validation Studies
    Surveys and Questionnaires
    experiment
    Walking
    performance
    Experiments

    Keywords

    • friction
    • field base
    • laboratory base
    • slipperiness
    • slipmeter

    Cite this

    Chang, W-R., Grönqvist, R., Leclercq, S., Brungraber, R., Mattke, U., Strandberg, L., ... Courtney, T. (2001). The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices. Ergonomics, 44(13), 1233-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110085583
    Chang, Wen-Ruey ; Grönqvist, Raoul ; Leclercq, Sylvie ; Brungraber, Robert ; Mattke, Ulrich ; Strandberg, Lennart ; Thorpe, Steve ; Myung, Rohae ; Makkonen, Lasse ; Courtney, Theodore. / The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2 : Survey of friction measurement devices. In: Ergonomics. 2001 ; Vol. 44, No. 13. pp. 1233-1261.
    @article{c6de4d11a2cf4c97ac1a2c7be82695f6,
    title = "The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices",
    abstract = "This paper seeks to address questions related to friction measurement such as how friction is related to human-centred assessment and actual slipping, and how repeatable friction measurements are. Commonly used devices for slipperiness measurement are surveyed and their characteristics compared with suggested test conditions from biomechanical observations summarized in Part 1. The issues of device validity, repeatability, reproducibility and usability are examined from the published literature. Friction assessment using the mechanical measurement devices described appears generally valid and reliable. However, the validity of most devices could be improved by bringing them within the range of human slipping conditions observed in biomechanical studies. Future studies should clearly describe the performance limitations of any device and its results and should consider whether the device conditions reflect these actual human slipping conditions. There is also a need for validation studies of more devices by walking experiments.",
    keywords = "friction, field base, laboratory base, slipperiness, slipmeter",
    author = "Wen-Ruey Chang and Raoul Gr{\"o}nqvist and Sylvie Leclercq and Robert Brungraber and Ulrich Mattke and Lennart Strandberg and Steve Thorpe and Rohae Myung and Lasse Makkonen and Theodore Courtney",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1080/00140130110085583",
    language = "English",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "1233--1261",
    journal = "Ergonomics",
    issn = "0014-0139",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "13",

    }

    Chang, W-R, Grönqvist, R, Leclercq, S, Brungraber, R, Mattke, U, Strandberg, L, Thorpe, S, Myung, R, Makkonen, L & Courtney, T 2001, 'The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices', Ergonomics, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 1233-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110085583

    The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2 : Survey of friction measurement devices. / Chang, Wen-Ruey; Grönqvist, Raoul; Leclercq, Sylvie; Brungraber, Robert; Mattke, Ulrich; Strandberg, Lennart; Thorpe, Steve; Myung, Rohae; Makkonen, Lasse; Courtney, Theodore.

    In: Ergonomics, Vol. 44, No. 13, 2001, p. 1233-1261.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2

    T2 - Survey of friction measurement devices

    AU - Chang, Wen-Ruey

    AU - Grönqvist, Raoul

    AU - Leclercq, Sylvie

    AU - Brungraber, Robert

    AU - Mattke, Ulrich

    AU - Strandberg, Lennart

    AU - Thorpe, Steve

    AU - Myung, Rohae

    AU - Makkonen, Lasse

    AU - Courtney, Theodore

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - This paper seeks to address questions related to friction measurement such as how friction is related to human-centred assessment and actual slipping, and how repeatable friction measurements are. Commonly used devices for slipperiness measurement are surveyed and their characteristics compared with suggested test conditions from biomechanical observations summarized in Part 1. The issues of device validity, repeatability, reproducibility and usability are examined from the published literature. Friction assessment using the mechanical measurement devices described appears generally valid and reliable. However, the validity of most devices could be improved by bringing them within the range of human slipping conditions observed in biomechanical studies. Future studies should clearly describe the performance limitations of any device and its results and should consider whether the device conditions reflect these actual human slipping conditions. There is also a need for validation studies of more devices by walking experiments.

    AB - This paper seeks to address questions related to friction measurement such as how friction is related to human-centred assessment and actual slipping, and how repeatable friction measurements are. Commonly used devices for slipperiness measurement are surveyed and their characteristics compared with suggested test conditions from biomechanical observations summarized in Part 1. The issues of device validity, repeatability, reproducibility and usability are examined from the published literature. Friction assessment using the mechanical measurement devices described appears generally valid and reliable. However, the validity of most devices could be improved by bringing them within the range of human slipping conditions observed in biomechanical studies. Future studies should clearly describe the performance limitations of any device and its results and should consider whether the device conditions reflect these actual human slipping conditions. There is also a need for validation studies of more devices by walking experiments.

    KW - friction

    KW - field base

    KW - laboratory base

    KW - slipperiness

    KW - slipmeter

    U2 - 10.1080/00140130110085583

    DO - 10.1080/00140130110085583

    M3 - Article

    VL - 44

    SP - 1233

    EP - 1261

    JO - Ergonomics

    JF - Ergonomics

    SN - 0014-0139

    IS - 13

    ER -

    Chang W-R, Grönqvist R, Leclercq S, Brungraber R, Mattke U, Strandberg L et al. The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices. Ergonomics. 2001;44(13):1233-1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110085583