The variance and the quantity 2Dt in capillary zone electrophoresis

Rauno Virtanen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The variance is generally used as a measure of dispersion of zones in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). It is a quantitative measure of the separation power of a system and different causes of dispersion can be rated by their partial variances, which can be summed up to total variance. However, the additivity is only valid for independent dispersion sources, a fact that often seems to be ignored. The ubiquitous dispersion source diffusion is taken into consideration by the Einstein term 2Dt. Other sources of dispersion are, e.g., injection, detection, thermal gradients, adsorption, and hydrodynamic flow. For each of these sources various variance expressions have been derived. The origin of the term 2Dt and its relation to the variance is explained and the calculation of variance in general is discussed. The equivalence of the diffusion variance and the term 2Dt is verified with some simple initial forms of sample zone and the additivity of variances in ideal zone electrophoresis is demonstrated. The change of conductivity in zones results in asymmetrical zone forms which is an indication of nonideality of a system. It is shown that in such cases the term 2Dt is no longer valid and its use as an additive variance component leads to an erroneous total variance. Because in zone electrophoresis conductivity in a zone always changes more or less, the additivity of variances is never perfectly valid. However, in many cases the nonideality may be so small that the additivity in practice is still applicable. A generally valid way to calculate theroretically the total variance of a zone is to derive a functional representation of the distribution and then calculate the variance from it. This is possible only in the simplest cases. Usually the distribution must be calculated by numerical methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1266 - 1270
Number of pages5
JournalElectrophoresis
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1993
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Capillary Electrophoresis
Electrophoresis
Hydrodynamics
Adsorption
Hot Temperature
Injections
Thermal gradients
Numerical methods

Cite this

Virtanen, Rauno. / The variance and the quantity 2Dt in capillary zone electrophoresis. In: Electrophoresis. 1993 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 1266 - 1270.
@article{1341d8b48c9344ba85add2dabbc1f2b1,
title = "The variance and the quantity 2Dt in capillary zone electrophoresis",
abstract = "The variance is generally used as a measure of dispersion of zones in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). It is a quantitative measure of the separation power of a system and different causes of dispersion can be rated by their partial variances, which can be summed up to total variance. However, the additivity is only valid for independent dispersion sources, a fact that often seems to be ignored. The ubiquitous dispersion source diffusion is taken into consideration by the Einstein term 2Dt. Other sources of dispersion are, e.g., injection, detection, thermal gradients, adsorption, and hydrodynamic flow. For each of these sources various variance expressions have been derived. The origin of the term 2Dt and its relation to the variance is explained and the calculation of variance in general is discussed. The equivalence of the diffusion variance and the term 2Dt is verified with some simple initial forms of sample zone and the additivity of variances in ideal zone electrophoresis is demonstrated. The change of conductivity in zones results in asymmetrical zone forms which is an indication of nonideality of a system. It is shown that in such cases the term 2Dt is no longer valid and its use as an additive variance component leads to an erroneous total variance. Because in zone electrophoresis conductivity in a zone always changes more or less, the additivity of variances is never perfectly valid. However, in many cases the nonideality may be so small that the additivity in practice is still applicable. A generally valid way to calculate theroretically the total variance of a zone is to derive a functional representation of the distribution and then calculate the variance from it. This is possible only in the simplest cases. Usually the distribution must be calculated by numerical methods.",
author = "Rauno Virtanen",
note = "Project code: KEM3015",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1002/elps.11501401193",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1266 -- 1270",
journal = "Electrophoresis",
issn = "0173-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "1",

}

The variance and the quantity 2Dt in capillary zone electrophoresis. / Virtanen, Rauno.

In: Electrophoresis, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1993, p. 1266 - 1270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The variance and the quantity 2Dt in capillary zone electrophoresis

AU - Virtanen, Rauno

N1 - Project code: KEM3015

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The variance is generally used as a measure of dispersion of zones in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). It is a quantitative measure of the separation power of a system and different causes of dispersion can be rated by their partial variances, which can be summed up to total variance. However, the additivity is only valid for independent dispersion sources, a fact that often seems to be ignored. The ubiquitous dispersion source diffusion is taken into consideration by the Einstein term 2Dt. Other sources of dispersion are, e.g., injection, detection, thermal gradients, adsorption, and hydrodynamic flow. For each of these sources various variance expressions have been derived. The origin of the term 2Dt and its relation to the variance is explained and the calculation of variance in general is discussed. The equivalence of the diffusion variance and the term 2Dt is verified with some simple initial forms of sample zone and the additivity of variances in ideal zone electrophoresis is demonstrated. The change of conductivity in zones results in asymmetrical zone forms which is an indication of nonideality of a system. It is shown that in such cases the term 2Dt is no longer valid and its use as an additive variance component leads to an erroneous total variance. Because in zone electrophoresis conductivity in a zone always changes more or less, the additivity of variances is never perfectly valid. However, in many cases the nonideality may be so small that the additivity in practice is still applicable. A generally valid way to calculate theroretically the total variance of a zone is to derive a functional representation of the distribution and then calculate the variance from it. This is possible only in the simplest cases. Usually the distribution must be calculated by numerical methods.

AB - The variance is generally used as a measure of dispersion of zones in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). It is a quantitative measure of the separation power of a system and different causes of dispersion can be rated by their partial variances, which can be summed up to total variance. However, the additivity is only valid for independent dispersion sources, a fact that often seems to be ignored. The ubiquitous dispersion source diffusion is taken into consideration by the Einstein term 2Dt. Other sources of dispersion are, e.g., injection, detection, thermal gradients, adsorption, and hydrodynamic flow. For each of these sources various variance expressions have been derived. The origin of the term 2Dt and its relation to the variance is explained and the calculation of variance in general is discussed. The equivalence of the diffusion variance and the term 2Dt is verified with some simple initial forms of sample zone and the additivity of variances in ideal zone electrophoresis is demonstrated. The change of conductivity in zones results in asymmetrical zone forms which is an indication of nonideality of a system. It is shown that in such cases the term 2Dt is no longer valid and its use as an additive variance component leads to an erroneous total variance. Because in zone electrophoresis conductivity in a zone always changes more or less, the additivity of variances is never perfectly valid. However, in many cases the nonideality may be so small that the additivity in practice is still applicable. A generally valid way to calculate theroretically the total variance of a zone is to derive a functional representation of the distribution and then calculate the variance from it. This is possible only in the simplest cases. Usually the distribution must be calculated by numerical methods.

U2 - 10.1002/elps.11501401193

DO - 10.1002/elps.11501401193

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1266

EP - 1270

JO - Electrophoresis

JF - Electrophoresis

SN - 0173-0835

IS - 1

ER -