Thermal comfort and gender: A literature review

Sami Karjalainen

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleScientificpeer-review

    152 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This review examines scientific literature on the effect of gender on indoor thermal comfort. Gender differences have been generally considered to be small and insignificant but this review shows that a growing number of studies have found significant differences in thermal comfort between the genders. Clearly more than half of the laboratory and field studies have found that females express more dissatisfaction than males in the same thermal environments. Very few studies have found males to be more dissatisfied than females. A meta‐analysis shows that females are more likely than males to express thermal dissatisfaction (ratio: 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.61–1.89). However, most studies found no significant difference in neutral temperatures between the genders. Females are more sensitive than males to a deviation from an optimal temperature and express more dissatisfaction, especially in cooler conditions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)96-109
    Number of pages14
    JournalIndoor Air
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    MoE publication typeA2 Review article in a scientific journal

    Fingerprint

    Thermal comfort
    Hot Temperature
    Literature
    Temperature
    Confidence Intervals

    Keywords

    • Thermal discomfort
    • thermal dissatisfaction
    • neutral temperature
    • meta-analysis
    • individual control
    • personal control
    • adaptive opportunities
    • sex

    Cite this

    Karjalainen, Sami. / Thermal comfort and gender : A literature review. In: Indoor Air. 2012 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 96-109.
    @article{edb226be8de142e89a44d59c871d60a6,
    title = "Thermal comfort and gender: A literature review",
    abstract = "This review examines scientific literature on the effect of gender on indoor thermal comfort. Gender differences have been generally considered to be small and insignificant but this review shows that a growing number of studies have found significant differences in thermal comfort between the genders. Clearly more than half of the laboratory and field studies have found that females express more dissatisfaction than males in the same thermal environments. Very few studies have found males to be more dissatisfied than females. A meta‐analysis shows that females are more likely than males to express thermal dissatisfaction (ratio: 1.74, 95{\%} confidence interval: 1.61–1.89). However, most studies found no significant difference in neutral temperatures between the genders. Females are more sensitive than males to a deviation from an optimal temperature and express more dissatisfaction, especially in cooler conditions.",
    keywords = "Thermal discomfort, thermal dissatisfaction, neutral temperature, meta-analysis, individual control, personal control, adaptive opportunities, sex",
    author = "Sami Karjalainen",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "96--109",
    journal = "Indoor Air",
    issn = "0905-6947",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "2",

    }

    Thermal comfort and gender : A literature review. / Karjalainen, Sami.

    In: Indoor Air, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2012, p. 96-109.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Thermal comfort and gender

    T2 - A literature review

    AU - Karjalainen, Sami

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This review examines scientific literature on the effect of gender on indoor thermal comfort. Gender differences have been generally considered to be small and insignificant but this review shows that a growing number of studies have found significant differences in thermal comfort between the genders. Clearly more than half of the laboratory and field studies have found that females express more dissatisfaction than males in the same thermal environments. Very few studies have found males to be more dissatisfied than females. A meta‐analysis shows that females are more likely than males to express thermal dissatisfaction (ratio: 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.61–1.89). However, most studies found no significant difference in neutral temperatures between the genders. Females are more sensitive than males to a deviation from an optimal temperature and express more dissatisfaction, especially in cooler conditions.

    AB - This review examines scientific literature on the effect of gender on indoor thermal comfort. Gender differences have been generally considered to be small and insignificant but this review shows that a growing number of studies have found significant differences in thermal comfort between the genders. Clearly more than half of the laboratory and field studies have found that females express more dissatisfaction than males in the same thermal environments. Very few studies have found males to be more dissatisfied than females. A meta‐analysis shows that females are more likely than males to express thermal dissatisfaction (ratio: 1.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.61–1.89). However, most studies found no significant difference in neutral temperatures between the genders. Females are more sensitive than males to a deviation from an optimal temperature and express more dissatisfaction, especially in cooler conditions.

    KW - Thermal discomfort

    KW - thermal dissatisfaction

    KW - neutral temperature

    KW - meta-analysis

    KW - individual control

    KW - personal control

    KW - adaptive opportunities

    KW - sex

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x

    M3 - Review Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 96

    EP - 109

    JO - Indoor Air

    JF - Indoor Air

    SN - 0905-6947

    IS - 2

    ER -