TY - CHAP
T1 - Three means of evaluation to boost industrial service culture
AU - Nuutinen, Maaria
AU - Lappalainen, Inka
AU - Airola, Merja
AU - Valjakka, Tiina
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Although industrial services are attracting increasing
attention, both in industry and within the research
community, many companies seem to have difficulties in
achieving significant progress in their service business.
The challenge has been characterised as a transition in
companies' orientation from product and technology toward
service and customer (see, for example, [1, 2, 3]).
Adopting service-dominant logic [e.g., 4, 5] and
interpreting the business transformation in a new,
holistic way could serve as a stepping-stone to a renewal
of practices and culture along with development of new
competencies [6]. However, there is a need for
theoretically grounded and practically tested approaches
to supporting companies in the transformation. In
particular, the industry lacks concepts and methods for
creation of a personal and shared understanding of 1) why
the change is needed: motives and commitment, 2) what
kind of organisational change is needed, and 3) how the
intended change could be supported and managed in
practice.
We approached the transition challenge for companies in
terms of a shift from a technology- and product-oriented
culture toward a more service- and
customer-value-oriented culture. We have developed an
assessment approach that bring new insight into
overcoming the challenges, by studying them from an
organisational culture perspective [7]. The approach,
developed first with manufacturing companies, has been
further applied in several industries, such as technical
trade and ICT. The purpose of this article is to present,
in brief, three distinct procedures for applying the
industrial service culture and capability approach. We
briefly describe the approach, then illustrate it and
consider its utilisation for three specific uses:
1. as an assessment tool for use by management groups
2. as a booster of the organisational learning process
3. as a structuring framework for roundtable work and
external benchmarking.
AB - Although industrial services are attracting increasing
attention, both in industry and within the research
community, many companies seem to have difficulties in
achieving significant progress in their service business.
The challenge has been characterised as a transition in
companies' orientation from product and technology toward
service and customer (see, for example, [1, 2, 3]).
Adopting service-dominant logic [e.g., 4, 5] and
interpreting the business transformation in a new,
holistic way could serve as a stepping-stone to a renewal
of practices and culture along with development of new
competencies [6]. However, there is a need for
theoretically grounded and practically tested approaches
to supporting companies in the transformation. In
particular, the industry lacks concepts and methods for
creation of a personal and shared understanding of 1) why
the change is needed: motives and commitment, 2) what
kind of organisational change is needed, and 3) how the
intended change could be supported and managed in
practice.
We approached the transition challenge for companies in
terms of a shift from a technology- and product-oriented
culture toward a more service- and
customer-value-oriented culture. We have developed an
assessment approach that bring new insight into
overcoming the challenges, by studying them from an
organisational culture perspective [7]. The approach,
developed first with manufacturing companies, has been
further applied in several industries, such as technical
trade and ICT. The purpose of this article is to present,
in brief, three distinct procedures for applying the
industrial service culture and capability approach. We
briefly describe the approach, then illustrate it and
consider its utilisation for three specific uses:
1. as an assessment tool for use by management groups
2. as a booster of the organisational learning process
3. as a structuring framework for roundtable work and
external benchmarking.
M3 - Chapter or book article
SN - 978-951-38-7968-6
T3 - VTT Research Highlights
SP - 74
EP - 82
BT - Highlights in service research
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
CY - Espoo
ER -