Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    Abstract

    Both the International Project Management Association (IPMA) and the Project Management Association (PMA) stress the importance of communication. For example, readers of the IPMA's Competence Baseline Version 3.0 (ICB3) are advised that, Effective communication is vital to the success of projects, programmes and portfolios. Yet, global projects can involve people who do not speak the same languages and/or who do not share the same cultures. This can lead to linguistic ambiguities in communications and/or conceptual ambiguities in communications. These ambiguities need to be minimized because they can threaten the reliability and validity of communications. The reliability of communications will be compromized if communications are understood differently by different recipients. The validity of communications will be compromized if communications do not address the issues which they are intended to address. In this paper, findings are reported from a study investigating sources of ambiguities and methods for minimizing ambiguities. Existing methods for minimizing ambiguities which can threaten the reliability and validity of communications were found to be of limited usefulness for global project communications. In particular, exhaustive translation / interpretation methods are too time-consuming and expensive. However, more economical alternatives to exhaustive methods do little to counteract threats to reliability and validity. Three new methods for minimizing ambiguities are put forward. The first is a standardized template. This offers both immediate and long-term advantages. A preliminary template was developed during the study and is presented in this paper. Second, the formulation of a methodology for minimizing ambiguities is proposed. Third, the development of topic-specific global project languages comprising symbols, symbol sets and symbol systems is recommended.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationEspoo
    PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
    Number of pages50
    ISBN (Electronic)978-951-38-6618-1
    Publication statusPublished - 2007
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Publication series

    SeriesVTT Working Papers
    Number67

    Fingerprint

    Communication
    Project management
    Linguistics

    Keywords

    • communication
    • reliability
    • validity
    • conceptual ambiguities
    • linguistic ambiguities

    Cite this

    Fox, S. (2007). Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Working Papers, No. 67
    Fox, Stephen. / Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2007. 50 p. (VTT Working Papers; No. 67).
    @book{4f00550e6ab546a786a987bccb2e8788,
    title = "Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications",
    abstract = "Both the International Project Management Association (IPMA) and the Project Management Association (PMA) stress the importance of communication. For example, readers of the IPMA's Competence Baseline Version 3.0 (ICB3) are advised that, Effective communication is vital to the success of projects, programmes and portfolios. Yet, global projects can involve people who do not speak the same languages and/or who do not share the same cultures. This can lead to linguistic ambiguities in communications and/or conceptual ambiguities in communications. These ambiguities need to be minimized because they can threaten the reliability and validity of communications. The reliability of communications will be compromized if communications are understood differently by different recipients. The validity of communications will be compromized if communications do not address the issues which they are intended to address. In this paper, findings are reported from a study investigating sources of ambiguities and methods for minimizing ambiguities. Existing methods for minimizing ambiguities which can threaten the reliability and validity of communications were found to be of limited usefulness for global project communications. In particular, exhaustive translation / interpretation methods are too time-consuming and expensive. However, more economical alternatives to exhaustive methods do little to counteract threats to reliability and validity. Three new methods for minimizing ambiguities are put forward. The first is a standardized template. This offers both immediate and long-term advantages. A preliminary template was developed during the study and is presented in this paper. Second, the formulation of a methodology for minimizing ambiguities is proposed. Third, the development of topic-specific global project languages comprising symbols, symbol sets and symbol systems is recommended.",
    keywords = "communication, reliability, validity, conceptual ambiguities, linguistic ambiguities",
    author = "Stephen Fox",
    note = "Project code: 1034",
    year = "2007",
    language = "English",
    series = "VTT Working Papers",
    publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
    number = "67",
    address = "Finland",

    }

    Fox, S 2007, Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications. VTT Working Papers, no. 67, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

    Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications. / Fox, Stephen.

    Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2007. 50 p. (VTT Working Papers; No. 67).

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications

    AU - Fox, Stephen

    N1 - Project code: 1034

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Both the International Project Management Association (IPMA) and the Project Management Association (PMA) stress the importance of communication. For example, readers of the IPMA's Competence Baseline Version 3.0 (ICB3) are advised that, Effective communication is vital to the success of projects, programmes and portfolios. Yet, global projects can involve people who do not speak the same languages and/or who do not share the same cultures. This can lead to linguistic ambiguities in communications and/or conceptual ambiguities in communications. These ambiguities need to be minimized because they can threaten the reliability and validity of communications. The reliability of communications will be compromized if communications are understood differently by different recipients. The validity of communications will be compromized if communications do not address the issues which they are intended to address. In this paper, findings are reported from a study investigating sources of ambiguities and methods for minimizing ambiguities. Existing methods for minimizing ambiguities which can threaten the reliability and validity of communications were found to be of limited usefulness for global project communications. In particular, exhaustive translation / interpretation methods are too time-consuming and expensive. However, more economical alternatives to exhaustive methods do little to counteract threats to reliability and validity. Three new methods for minimizing ambiguities are put forward. The first is a standardized template. This offers both immediate and long-term advantages. A preliminary template was developed during the study and is presented in this paper. Second, the formulation of a methodology for minimizing ambiguities is proposed. Third, the development of topic-specific global project languages comprising symbols, symbol sets and symbol systems is recommended.

    AB - Both the International Project Management Association (IPMA) and the Project Management Association (PMA) stress the importance of communication. For example, readers of the IPMA's Competence Baseline Version 3.0 (ICB3) are advised that, Effective communication is vital to the success of projects, programmes and portfolios. Yet, global projects can involve people who do not speak the same languages and/or who do not share the same cultures. This can lead to linguistic ambiguities in communications and/or conceptual ambiguities in communications. These ambiguities need to be minimized because they can threaten the reliability and validity of communications. The reliability of communications will be compromized if communications are understood differently by different recipients. The validity of communications will be compromized if communications do not address the issues which they are intended to address. In this paper, findings are reported from a study investigating sources of ambiguities and methods for minimizing ambiguities. Existing methods for minimizing ambiguities which can threaten the reliability and validity of communications were found to be of limited usefulness for global project communications. In particular, exhaustive translation / interpretation methods are too time-consuming and expensive. However, more economical alternatives to exhaustive methods do little to counteract threats to reliability and validity. Three new methods for minimizing ambiguities are put forward. The first is a standardized template. This offers both immediate and long-term advantages. A preliminary template was developed during the study and is presented in this paper. Second, the formulation of a methodology for minimizing ambiguities is proposed. Third, the development of topic-specific global project languages comprising symbols, symbol sets and symbol systems is recommended.

    KW - communication

    KW - reliability

    KW - validity

    KW - conceptual ambiguities

    KW - linguistic ambiguities

    M3 - Report

    T3 - VTT Working Papers

    BT - Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications

    PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    CY - Espoo

    ER -

    Fox S. Three original methods for minimizing ambiguities in global project communications. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2007. 50 p. (VTT Working Papers; No. 67).