Timing synchronization of the WIND-FLEX OFDM prototype

Mika Lasanen; Jukka Rautio; Mauri Nissilä

Timing synchronization of the WIND-FLEX OFDM prototype

Mika Lasanen, Jukka Rautio, Mauri Nissilä

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

Timing synchronization of an early WIND-FLEX prototype is discussed in this paper. Simulation results for different low-complexity timing synchronization metrics are given in an AWGN (additive white Gaussian noise) channel. Simulations take into account frame detection via a threshold comparison followed by symbol timing estimation using a maximum search. Training symbols are fixed. A novel low-complexity metric reaches equal or better results than the maximum correlation (MC) metric, if we require optimal timing. Furthermore, nearly identical performance as with the maximum normalized correlation (MNC) metric is achieved, if threshold 0.4 or 0.6 is used.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit
Pages	348-352
Number of pages	5
Publication status	Published - 2002
MoE publication type	Not Eligible
Event	IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit - Thessaloniki, Greece Duration: 17 Jun 2002 → 19 Jun 2002

Conference

Conference	IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit
Country	Greece
City	Thessaloniki
Period	17/06/02 → 19/06/02

Fingerprint

Cite this

Lasanen, M., Rautio, J., & Nissilä, M. (2002). Timing synchronization of the WIND-FLEX OFDM prototype. In Proceedings of IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit (pp. 348-352) https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0824/0a2fcf7f536e23b63fd5a4f8188ca1b5b7bb.pdf

@inproceedings{b28c524818b84bf1b3ec59e07f68dfe8,

title = "Timing synchronization of the WIND-FLEX OFDM prototype",

abstract = "Timing synchronization of an early WIND-FLEX prototype is discussed in this paper. Simulation results for different low-complexity timing synchronization metrics are given in an AWGN (additive white Gaussian noise) channel. Simulations take into account frame detection via a threshold comparison followed by symbol timing estimation using a maximum search. Training symbols are fixed. A novel low-complexity metric reaches equal or better results than the maximum correlation (MC) metric, if we require optimal timing. Furthermore, nearly identical performance as with the maximum normalized correlation (MNC) metric is achieved, if threshold 0.4 or 0.6 is used. ",

author = "Mika Lasanen and Jukka Rautio and Mauri Nissil{\"a}",

year = "2002",

language = "English",

pages = "348--352",

booktitle = "Proceedings of IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit",

note = "IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit ; Conference date: 17-06-2002 Through 19-06-2002",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Timing synchronization of the WIND-FLEX OFDM prototype

AU - Lasanen, Mika

AU - Rautio, Jukka

AU - Nissilä, Mauri

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Timing synchronization of an early WIND-FLEX prototype is discussed in this paper. Simulation results for different low-complexity timing synchronization metrics are given in an AWGN (additive white Gaussian noise) channel. Simulations take into account frame detection via a threshold comparison followed by symbol timing estimation using a maximum search. Training symbols are fixed. A novel low-complexity metric reaches equal or better results than the maximum correlation (MC) metric, if we require optimal timing. Furthermore, nearly identical performance as with the maximum normalized correlation (MNC) metric is achieved, if threshold 0.4 or 0.6 is used.

AB - Timing synchronization of an early WIND-FLEX prototype is discussed in this paper. Simulation results for different low-complexity timing synchronization metrics are given in an AWGN (additive white Gaussian noise) channel. Simulations take into account frame detection via a threshold comparison followed by symbol timing estimation using a maximum search. Training symbols are fixed. A novel low-complexity metric reaches equal or better results than the maximum correlation (MC) metric, if we require optimal timing. Furthermore, nearly identical performance as with the maximum normalized correlation (MNC) metric is achieved, if threshold 0.4 or 0.6 is used.

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SP - 348

EP - 352

BT - Proceedings of IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit

T2 - IST Mobile and Wireless Telecommunications Summit

Y2 - 17 June 2002 through 19 June 2002

ER -

Access to Document

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0824/0a2fcf7f536e23b63fd5a4f8188ca1b5b7bb.pdf