TY - CHAP
T1 - Towards a behavioral theory of competitive interactions
T2 - Academy of Management 2012 Annual Meeting
AU - Luoma, J.
AU - Ruutu, Sampsa
AU - Tikkanen, H.
N1 - Only abstract published
Project code: 42598
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Competitive dynamics research has produced compelling insights into how
firms use market-oriented moves to attain and sustain competitive advantage.
Surprisingly, there has been less integrative research on how combinations of
various mechanisms and processes affect competitive dynamics over time.
Consequently, we develop a system dynamic model of dyadic competitive
interaction by drawing insights from behavioral theory of the firm and
evolutionary theory. We show how a small set of existing, well-established
behavioral assumptions about how firms employ competitive actions can explain
a rich variety of competitive behavior patterns. Our simulations corroborate
the robust empirical finding that, generally, a high level of competitive
activity leads to high performance. However, competitive actions also incur
costs and increase the risk that rivals respond. By implication, managers
cannot know with precision if they should increase competitive activity. We
explain how this un-resolvable uncertainty surrounding the gains from
competitive actions is in itself a sufficient explanation of interfirm
performance differences.
AB - Competitive dynamics research has produced compelling insights into how
firms use market-oriented moves to attain and sustain competitive advantage.
Surprisingly, there has been less integrative research on how combinations of
various mechanisms and processes affect competitive dynamics over time.
Consequently, we develop a system dynamic model of dyadic competitive
interaction by drawing insights from behavioral theory of the firm and
evolutionary theory. We show how a small set of existing, well-established
behavioral assumptions about how firms employ competitive actions can explain
a rich variety of competitive behavior patterns. Our simulations corroborate
the robust empirical finding that, generally, a high level of competitive
activity leads to high performance. However, competitive actions also incur
costs and increase the risk that rivals respond. By implication, managers
cannot know with precision if they should increase competitive activity. We
explain how this un-resolvable uncertainty surrounding the gains from
competitive actions is in itself a sufficient explanation of interfirm
performance differences.
KW - Competitive dynamics
KW - behavioral theory of the firm
KW - simulation
U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2012.33
DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2012.33
M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings
T3 - Academy of Management Proceedings
BT - Academy of Management Proceedings
PB - Academy of Management
Y2 - 3 August 2012 through 7 August 2012
ER -