Abstract
Problems in software development mainly spring from the
difficulty of establishing and stabilizing the
requirements, the changeability of the software and
interactive dependency of the software, hardware and
human beings. A software development process consists of
a set of empirical and 'best' practices in software
development, together with organization and management
that are needed for the software product implementation.
Different process models, such as CMMI (Capability
Maturity Model Integration), ISO 9001 and ISO 15504, have
been developed in the last decade to support the
assessment of software development processes. The main
process model, examined in this thesis, is CMMI. This
model was chosen as the focus of this research because it
is a widely-used, beneficial approach for identifying the
key weaknesses of a software development process which
need immediate attention and improvement. Two of the key
challenges of CMMI assessments are 1) overly heavy and
time-consuming assessments and 2) the risk that the
achievement of CMMI levels forces the developers to use
more time writing documents than implementing the
software product.
The level of interest in the use of agile practices
(focusing on practices such as eXtreme Programming and
Scrum) has radically increased in software organizations.
Practitioners argue that the adoption of agile software
development methods can solve the organizational need for
a more rapid and flexible software development process,
and enable improved communication in changing market
situations. A brief analysis of the empirical body of
knowledge reveals, however, that there are also several
challenges in interactive dependency management and
communication between the actors of software development
in an agile context.
The objective of this study is to increase the
understanding of how improvements can be made in the
software development process, mediated with CMMI
'specific' goals and agile practices from communication
perspective. This study is based on a series of case
studies and data from 4 companies and 8 software
development teams. To prove the importance of the
improvement approach, this study starts with an
evaluation of the agile practices in current use, using
well established 'innovation of adoption' theories. The
evaluation indicates that agile practices can achieve the
subsequent assimilation stages differentially. The
results also support the use of an adoption strategy, in
which the needs of the teams are first defined before
mapping the agile practice-based improvement solutions to
the project level challenges.
Although the iteration retrospectives provide a practical
way for improving a software development process at team
level, companies need mechanisms to constantly implement
improvement initiatives and share knowledge of the
process status also at organizational level. To meet this
gap in the current empirical body of knowledge and
research, a novel framework is presented in this study.
The framework can be used 1) to identify the agile
practices for a plan-driven software development process
and 2) to assess the software development process in a
lightweight manner against the CMMI goals and agile
practices.
To indicate the value of the created framework, it is
important to collect empirical evidence on how agile
practices actually affect communication in the software
development process. This study applies coordination
theory to confirm that the adoption of agile practices,
such as sprint planning, an open office space, daily
meetings and product backlogs improve the communication
and management of requirements, features and project task
dependencies in agile software development teams.
Additionally, increased informal communication can in
some cases decrease the need for upfront documentation in
software development teams and, therefore, facilitate
more productive software development than in previous
plan driven situations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor Degree |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 10 Nov 2008 |
Place of Publication | Espoo |
Publisher | |
Print ISBNs | 978-951-38-7121-5 |
Electronic ISBNs | 978-951-38-7122-2 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
MoE publication type | G5 Doctoral dissertation (article) |
Keywords
- CMMI
- agile practices
- lightweight assessment
- communication