Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Open innovation (OI) communities have dramatically changed our conceptions of how innovation can and should be managed and have prompted calls for new theories of innovation (von Hippel and von Krogh 2003). OI communities with customers can act as a source for learning and producing external ideas or even solutions to companies. As earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of ideas, motivating and supporting collaboration in online OI communities is important. This explorative study explores collaboration in online OI communities by answering two questions. The first question considers users' motivations to collaborate in OI communities, while the second one explores how rewarding can be used to motivate collaboration in OI communities. The study consists of three cases: CrowdSpirit, FellowForce and Owela. The preliminary results are based on the data gathered by interviewing maintainers of the communities and by a questionnaire to the community members. According to the results, the users were motivated to collaborate by interesting objectives and the concept of the community, gaining new viewpoints from other users, obtaining better products and receiving rewards. The results also indicate that the lack of proper tools inhibits collaboration in OI communities. Furthermore, an OI community's rewarding strategy should be transparent and logical. Rewarding should be based on the efforts and quality of the work rather than on giving rewards based on the quantity of ideas or lotteries. The system should be flexible so that rewards vary in different situations and phases of the work. The equity and democracy of the rewarding system are important factors for OI community users. Additionally, customisability of the rewarding strategy ensures that users can influence, on some level, the nature of the rewards they receive, and the rewards will therefore be more valuable to everyone This explorative study is one of the first studies of collaboration in online OI communities. In addition to serving academia, the study provides practical knowledge on how to reward and motivate groups of members on the web to companies and the growing number of OI intermediaries building or planning to build innovation communities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010
Pages52-60
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-906638-73-3
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication

Fingerprint

Open innovation
Reward
Innovation
Conception
Intermediaries
Factors
Logic
Democracy
World Wide Web
Planning
Questionnaire
Lottery
Problem solving
Interviewing
Equity

Keywords

  • online communities
  • open innovation
  • intermediaries
  • rewarding
  • collaboration
  • monetary
  • non-monetary
  • tangible
  • intangible
  • recognition
  • motivation
  • case study

Cite this

Antikainen, M. (2010). Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities. In Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010 (pp. 52-60)
Antikainen, Maria. / Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities. Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010. 2010. pp. 52-60
@inproceedings{3e2324efcda74813a88f0d4cfc0d4990,
title = "Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities",
abstract = "Open innovation (OI) communities have dramatically changed our conceptions of how innovation can and should be managed and have prompted calls for new theories of innovation (von Hippel and von Krogh 2003). OI communities with customers can act as a source for learning and producing external ideas or even solutions to companies. As earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of ideas, motivating and supporting collaboration in online OI communities is important. This explorative study explores collaboration in online OI communities by answering two questions. The first question considers users' motivations to collaborate in OI communities, while the second one explores how rewarding can be used to motivate collaboration in OI communities. The study consists of three cases: CrowdSpirit, FellowForce and Owela. The preliminary results are based on the data gathered by interviewing maintainers of the communities and by a questionnaire to the community members. According to the results, the users were motivated to collaborate by interesting objectives and the concept of the community, gaining new viewpoints from other users, obtaining better products and receiving rewards. The results also indicate that the lack of proper tools inhibits collaboration in OI communities. Furthermore, an OI community's rewarding strategy should be transparent and logical. Rewarding should be based on the efforts and quality of the work rather than on giving rewards based on the quantity of ideas or lotteries. The system should be flexible so that rewards vary in different situations and phases of the work. The equity and democracy of the rewarding system are important factors for OI community users. Additionally, customisability of the rewarding strategy ensures that users can influence, on some level, the nature of the rewards they receive, and the rewards will therefore be more valuable to everyone This explorative study is one of the first studies of collaboration in online OI communities. In addition to serving academia, the study provides practical knowledge on how to reward and motivate groups of members on the web to companies and the growing number of OI intermediaries building or planning to build innovation communities.",
keywords = "online communities, open innovation, intermediaries, rewarding, collaboration, monetary, non-monetary, tangible, intangible, recognition, motivation, case study",
author = "Maria Antikainen",
note = "Project code: 36190",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-906638-75-7",
pages = "52--60",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010",

}

Antikainen, M 2010, Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities. in Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010. pp. 52-60.

Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities. / Antikainen, Maria.

Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010. 2010. p. 52-60.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities

AU - Antikainen, Maria

N1 - Project code: 36190

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Open innovation (OI) communities have dramatically changed our conceptions of how innovation can and should be managed and have prompted calls for new theories of innovation (von Hippel and von Krogh 2003). OI communities with customers can act as a source for learning and producing external ideas or even solutions to companies. As earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of ideas, motivating and supporting collaboration in online OI communities is important. This explorative study explores collaboration in online OI communities by answering two questions. The first question considers users' motivations to collaborate in OI communities, while the second one explores how rewarding can be used to motivate collaboration in OI communities. The study consists of three cases: CrowdSpirit, FellowForce and Owela. The preliminary results are based on the data gathered by interviewing maintainers of the communities and by a questionnaire to the community members. According to the results, the users were motivated to collaborate by interesting objectives and the concept of the community, gaining new viewpoints from other users, obtaining better products and receiving rewards. The results also indicate that the lack of proper tools inhibits collaboration in OI communities. Furthermore, an OI community's rewarding strategy should be transparent and logical. Rewarding should be based on the efforts and quality of the work rather than on giving rewards based on the quantity of ideas or lotteries. The system should be flexible so that rewards vary in different situations and phases of the work. The equity and democracy of the rewarding system are important factors for OI community users. Additionally, customisability of the rewarding strategy ensures that users can influence, on some level, the nature of the rewards they receive, and the rewards will therefore be more valuable to everyone This explorative study is one of the first studies of collaboration in online OI communities. In addition to serving academia, the study provides practical knowledge on how to reward and motivate groups of members on the web to companies and the growing number of OI intermediaries building or planning to build innovation communities.

AB - Open innovation (OI) communities have dramatically changed our conceptions of how innovation can and should be managed and have prompted calls for new theories of innovation (von Hippel and von Krogh 2003). OI communities with customers can act as a source for learning and producing external ideas or even solutions to companies. As earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of ideas, motivating and supporting collaboration in online OI communities is important. This explorative study explores collaboration in online OI communities by answering two questions. The first question considers users' motivations to collaborate in OI communities, while the second one explores how rewarding can be used to motivate collaboration in OI communities. The study consists of three cases: CrowdSpirit, FellowForce and Owela. The preliminary results are based on the data gathered by interviewing maintainers of the communities and by a questionnaire to the community members. According to the results, the users were motivated to collaborate by interesting objectives and the concept of the community, gaining new viewpoints from other users, obtaining better products and receiving rewards. The results also indicate that the lack of proper tools inhibits collaboration in OI communities. Furthermore, an OI community's rewarding strategy should be transparent and logical. Rewarding should be based on the efforts and quality of the work rather than on giving rewards based on the quantity of ideas or lotteries. The system should be flexible so that rewards vary in different situations and phases of the work. The equity and democracy of the rewarding system are important factors for OI community users. Additionally, customisability of the rewarding strategy ensures that users can influence, on some level, the nature of the rewards they receive, and the rewards will therefore be more valuable to everyone This explorative study is one of the first studies of collaboration in online OI communities. In addition to serving academia, the study provides practical knowledge on how to reward and motivate groups of members on the web to companies and the growing number of OI intermediaries building or planning to build innovation communities.

KW - online communities

KW - open innovation

KW - intermediaries

KW - rewarding

KW - collaboration

KW - monetary

KW - non-monetary

KW - tangible

KW - intangible

KW - recognition

KW - motivation

KW - case study

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-906638-75-7

SP - 52

EP - 60

BT - Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010

ER -

Antikainen M. Towards Collaborative Open Innovation Communities. In Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Athens,16 - 17 September 2010. 2010. p. 52-60