Towards energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment by optimized sludge treatment

Mona Arnold, Elina Merta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of sludge in renewable energy production and the final disposal of sludge are topical issues. The cost of sludge treatment account for a significant share of the total running costs of a WWTP. By increasing the efficiency of sludge treatment, significant savings can be achieved. Savings can be gained e.g. by more efficient energy utilisation of sludge, combined with optimised wastewater treatment processes. In addition to cost efficiency, environmental sustainability of the applied solutions is crucial. The energy balance and green house gas emissions can be used as tools to evaluate the sustainability of sludge treatment options. This paper presents a case-based comparison of energy balances, greenhouse gas emissions and costs of municipal wastewater sludge process chains based on anaerobic digestion or incineration. Information from existing plants was used for conducting the study. Several utilisation options were covered for biogas energy as well for energy from sludge incineration. Based on the results, sludge incineration was the most expensive option of the studied scenarios, but justified if the heat generated can be fully utilised e.g. in district heating. Based on costs and energy balances as well as greenhouse gas emissions it is most preferable in anaerobic digestion chains to feed the generated biogas to a gas engine to produce electricity and heat. Moreover, thermophilic anaerobic digestion can improve the overall economy of a WWTP provided that the biogas yield is sufficiently higher than in a mesophilic process. However increased odour is a risk in thermophilic digestion. The study showed that the most energy efficient process modifications are always very case bound. However the tools developed in this study are generally applicable to waste water treatment plants for similar analyses.
Original languageEnglish
Article number69
JournalWater Practice and Technology
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed
Event3rd Singapore International Water Week 2010 - Singapore, Singapore
Duration: 4 Jul 20108 Jul 2010

Fingerprint

self sufficiency
biogas
sludge
energy balance
cost
greenhouse gas
energy
savings
sustainability
incineration
odor
digestion
electricity
wastewater treatment
sludge treatment
wastewater
anaerobic digestion

Keywords

  • Sludge management
  • energy efficiency
  • anaerobic digestion
  • incineration
  • climate impact
  • cost

Cite this

@article{6d5a457c0b0d456b8be70dfd94324163,
title = "Towards energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment by optimized sludge treatment",
abstract = "The role of sludge in renewable energy production and the final disposal of sludge are topical issues. The cost of sludge treatment account for a significant share of the total running costs of a WWTP. By increasing the efficiency of sludge treatment, significant savings can be achieved. Savings can be gained e.g. by more efficient energy utilisation of sludge, combined with optimised wastewater treatment processes. In addition to cost efficiency, environmental sustainability of the applied solutions is crucial. The energy balance and green house gas emissions can be used as tools to evaluate the sustainability of sludge treatment options. This paper presents a case-based comparison of energy balances, greenhouse gas emissions and costs of municipal wastewater sludge process chains based on anaerobic digestion or incineration. Information from existing plants was used for conducting the study. Several utilisation options were covered for biogas energy as well for energy from sludge incineration. Based on the results, sludge incineration was the most expensive option of the studied scenarios, but justified if the heat generated can be fully utilised e.g. in district heating. Based on costs and energy balances as well as greenhouse gas emissions it is most preferable in anaerobic digestion chains to feed the generated biogas to a gas engine to produce electricity and heat. Moreover, thermophilic anaerobic digestion can improve the overall economy of a WWTP provided that the biogas yield is sufficiently higher than in a mesophilic process. However increased odour is a risk in thermophilic digestion. The study showed that the most energy efficient process modifications are always very case bound. However the tools developed in this study are generally applicable to waste water treatment plants for similar analyses.",
keywords = "Sludge management, energy efficiency, anaerobic digestion, incineration, climate impact, cost",
author = "Mona Arnold and Elina Merta",
note = "Project code: 30875",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.2166/wpt.2011.0069",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Water Practice and Technology",
issn = "1751-231X",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Towards energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment by optimized sludge treatment. / Arnold, Mona; Merta, Elina.

In: Water Practice and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4, 69, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards energy self-sufficiency in wastewater treatment by optimized sludge treatment

AU - Arnold, Mona

AU - Merta, Elina

N1 - Project code: 30875

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The role of sludge in renewable energy production and the final disposal of sludge are topical issues. The cost of sludge treatment account for a significant share of the total running costs of a WWTP. By increasing the efficiency of sludge treatment, significant savings can be achieved. Savings can be gained e.g. by more efficient energy utilisation of sludge, combined with optimised wastewater treatment processes. In addition to cost efficiency, environmental sustainability of the applied solutions is crucial. The energy balance and green house gas emissions can be used as tools to evaluate the sustainability of sludge treatment options. This paper presents a case-based comparison of energy balances, greenhouse gas emissions and costs of municipal wastewater sludge process chains based on anaerobic digestion or incineration. Information from existing plants was used for conducting the study. Several utilisation options were covered for biogas energy as well for energy from sludge incineration. Based on the results, sludge incineration was the most expensive option of the studied scenarios, but justified if the heat generated can be fully utilised e.g. in district heating. Based on costs and energy balances as well as greenhouse gas emissions it is most preferable in anaerobic digestion chains to feed the generated biogas to a gas engine to produce electricity and heat. Moreover, thermophilic anaerobic digestion can improve the overall economy of a WWTP provided that the biogas yield is sufficiently higher than in a mesophilic process. However increased odour is a risk in thermophilic digestion. The study showed that the most energy efficient process modifications are always very case bound. However the tools developed in this study are generally applicable to waste water treatment plants for similar analyses.

AB - The role of sludge in renewable energy production and the final disposal of sludge are topical issues. The cost of sludge treatment account for a significant share of the total running costs of a WWTP. By increasing the efficiency of sludge treatment, significant savings can be achieved. Savings can be gained e.g. by more efficient energy utilisation of sludge, combined with optimised wastewater treatment processes. In addition to cost efficiency, environmental sustainability of the applied solutions is crucial. The energy balance and green house gas emissions can be used as tools to evaluate the sustainability of sludge treatment options. This paper presents a case-based comparison of energy balances, greenhouse gas emissions and costs of municipal wastewater sludge process chains based on anaerobic digestion or incineration. Information from existing plants was used for conducting the study. Several utilisation options were covered for biogas energy as well for energy from sludge incineration. Based on the results, sludge incineration was the most expensive option of the studied scenarios, but justified if the heat generated can be fully utilised e.g. in district heating. Based on costs and energy balances as well as greenhouse gas emissions it is most preferable in anaerobic digestion chains to feed the generated biogas to a gas engine to produce electricity and heat. Moreover, thermophilic anaerobic digestion can improve the overall economy of a WWTP provided that the biogas yield is sufficiently higher than in a mesophilic process. However increased odour is a risk in thermophilic digestion. The study showed that the most energy efficient process modifications are always very case bound. However the tools developed in this study are generally applicable to waste water treatment plants for similar analyses.

KW - Sludge management

KW - energy efficiency

KW - anaerobic digestion

KW - incineration

KW - climate impact

KW - cost

U2 - 10.2166/wpt.2011.0069

DO - 10.2166/wpt.2011.0069

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Water Practice and Technology

JF - Water Practice and Technology

SN - 1751-231X

IS - 4

M1 - 69

ER -