Abstract
This paper presents a comparative analysis of novel supervised fuzzy adaptive resonance theory (SF-ART), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and competitive neural trees (CNeT) Networks over three pattern recognition problems. We have used two well-known patterns (IRIS and Vowel data) and a biological data (hydrogen data) to evaluate and check SF-ART stability, reliability, learning speed and computational load. The comparative tests with IRIS, Vowels and H2 data indicate that the SF-ART is capable to perform with a high classification performance, high learning speed (elapsed time for learning around half second), and very low computational load compared to the well-known neural networks such as MLP and CNeT which need minutes and seconds respectively to learn the training material.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1082-1093 |
| Journal | Pattern Recognition Letters |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards the Experimental Evaluation of Novel Supervised Fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theory for Pattern Classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver