Toxicological and nutritional evaluation of plant cell cultures from scurvy grass (Cochlearia danica) and rowan (Sorbus aucuparia)

  • Felicianna
  • , Ho Lam Cheung
  • , Emily Kwun Kwan Lo
  • , Fangfei Zhang
  • , Hoi Kit Matthew Leung
  • , Marsena Jasiel Ismaiah
  • , Natalia Rosa-Sibakov
  • , Valeria Iannone
  • , Carlos Gómez-Gallego
  • , Marjukka Kolehmainen
  • , Heiko Rischer
  • , Emilia Nordlund
  • , Hani El-Nezami*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Plant cell culture (PCC) technology is currently being developed to produce plant foods partially decoupled from traditional agriculture practices. By now, the safety of the ingredients produced by PCC technology for food or nutritional purposes has to be tested. Materials and methods: In this study, the oral safety and toxicity of two novel PCCs, scurvy grass (SG) (Cochlearia danica) and rowan (RW) (Sorbus aucuparia), and to characterize the macro- and micronutrient quality, including proteomic profiles, to identify potential allergens. Results: Nutritional composition analysis showed that both SG and RW PCCs profiles are comparable to other berry cell lines with a good amount of protein, dietary fibre and vitamins. Potential allergens were identified via proteomics based on structural similarity. The acute and subacute toxicity profiles of the PCC samples were evaluated based on OECD guidelines. For both PCCs, no deaths, behavioral changes, nor metabolic effects were observed at 2000 mg/kg. In the 28-day repeated oral exposure subacute toxicity study, no mortality or significant adverse clinical, hematological, or metabolic effects were observed for either SG or RW. Discussion: These findings indicate that the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for both PCCs exceeds 2000 mg/kg. Overall, our findings indicate that the consumption of these PCCs could be considered safe and non-toxic, although further assessments on potential allergens and phytohormone accumulation are necessary to fully ensure consumer safety. This study highlights the oral safety of PCCs for consideration as a novel food ingredient and serve as a basis for evaluating toxicological impacts of PCCs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1655489
JournalFrontiers in Toxicology
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The study was funded by the Research Council of Finland (VTT funding ID 339182, and the University of Eastern Finland, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition funding ID 339184). The skilful upscaling work for biomass generation of Kaisa Rinta-Harri and Maria Pajumo is gratefully acknowledged. Proteomic analysis was performed at the Proteomics Core Facility, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, with financial support from SciLifeLab and BioMS. Oona Koivisto is thanked for the preliminary analysis of the proteomics data.

Keywords

  • acute toxicity
  • biosafety
  • cellular agriculture
  • food ingredients
  • nutritional composition
  • subacute toxicity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toxicological and nutritional evaluation of plant cell cultures from scurvy grass (Cochlearia danica) and rowan (Sorbus aucuparia)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this