Abstract
Introduction
More complex work systems evolve through the
incorporation of new mediations such as new technologies,
deepening the division of labour, and development of
sciences. Local labor processes increasingly embody
capabilities and knowledge that are developed in the
broader society instead of those based on experience in
the local context (Marx, 1976). New technologies affect
work and organizing in many ways. According to Pérez
(2002), technological breakthroughs provide, not only a
set of generic technologies but organizational principles
as well, finally leading to the modernization and
regeneration of the whole productive system, a new
'techno-economic paradigm'. Organizational and
institutional transformations - and perhaps also the
consequent new meanings of work - occur only with delay
after technological changes.
Theory
In empirical sociological research, 'meaning' often
refers to symbolism that people attach to certain objects
or functions (Alasuutari, 1999). Our approach to meaning
is informed by the notion of the object of work, which
comes from the cultural-historical activity theory. The
object is something both given, as part of independent
reality, and projected by human interpretations. In this
interpreted, need-related capacity, the object gains a
motivating force that gives shape and directs activities
(Y. Engeström, Puonti & Seppänen, 2003). The collective,
or societal, object and motive of a work activity is
embedded in the way in which people construct the meaning
of their work in everyday situations. However,
individuals' meaning construction is not limited to the
collective or societal objects and meanings (Bratus,
2005; R. Engeström, 2014; Stetsenko, 2005). New
mediations such as technological devices affect not only
the interpreted side of the work object, but also the
whole work system with its rules and division of labour.
Our approach to meaning is also informed by the notion of
interpretative practice. It refers to an active process
of engaging in work such as dealing constantly with
uncertainty, appropriating relevant scientific knowledge
in embodied work, and generalizing deeper understanding
of the development and systemic interdependencies of the
object. The assumption is that the increasing complexity
of work requires interpretative mode of working, and that
it simultaneously promotes learning and meaningfulness
for work practitioners. (Wahlström, Norros, Seppänen,
Schaupp & Toiviainen, 2014).
Robot-assisted surgery
Technology has revolutionized surgery in reducing
anatomical invasiveness and increasing the range of
available surgical measures. Empirically, we investigate
the surgery in urology that is assisted with computerized
surgical device using mechanical robotic arms. Work with
it is more teleoperation with limited automation rather
than an autonomous robot. By incorporating sophisticated
wristed technology at the terminal ends of the robotic
instruments, a surgeon can operate, dissect, and suture
with the facility of a human wrist (Su & Smith, 2012).
The surgeon, operating distanced from the patient, needs
to trust that the robot functions exactly as promised. It
provokes many changes and new constraints in the way to
operate and in the role of involved actors (Blavier &
Nyssen, 2010). Robot-assisted surgery transforms in-depth
the human-machine system. Surgical action becomes
increasingly remote, and technology has drawn the
operating room team more closely into its control (Healey
& Benn, 2009).
Data, method and findings
Our first aim is to examine how this new technology
transforms the surgeons' work and its terms of reference.
We do this by investigating how surgeons, in interviews,
depict the changes when moving from open to robotic
surgery. Changes occur on many levels, ranging from
global (such as the international maintenance of the
device) to organizational, team, and to individual
practitioners' work. The second aim of our presentation
is to analyse, what kinds of new meaning this
technological transformation has brought. The analysis is
guided by the notions of object construction and
interpretative mode of work. This exploratory study about
the new meanings in surgeons' work will help us better
understand the learning challenges and the role of
interpretativeness in the development of this complex,
robotic-assisted, science-related and bodily work.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | WORK2015 - Abstracts |
Publisher | University of Turku |
ISBN (Print) | 978-951-29-5895-5 |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Event | WORK2015 - New Meanings of Work - Turku, Finland Duration: 19 Aug 2015 → 21 Aug 2015 |
Conference
Conference | WORK2015 - New Meanings of Work |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | WORK2015 |
Country/Territory | Finland |
City | Turku |
Period | 19/08/15 → 21/08/15 |
Keywords
- robotic surgery
- work