Abstract
Predictive transport modelling and gyrokinetic stability analyses of
demonstration hybrid (HYBRID) and advanced tokamak (AT) discharges from
the International Tokamak Physics Activity (ITPA) profile database are
presented. Both regimes have exhibited enhanced core confinement (above
the conventional ITER reference H-mode scenario) but differ in their
current density profiles. Recent contributions to the ITPA database have
facilitated an effort to study the underlying physics governing
confinement in these advanced scenarios. In this paper, we assess the
level of commonality of the turbulent transport physics and the relative
roles of the transport suppression mechanisms (i.e. E × B
shear and Shafranov shift (α) stabilization) using data for select
HYBRID and AT discharges from the DIII-D, JET and AUG tokamaks. GLF23
transport modelling and gyrokinetic stability analysis indicate that E × B
shear and Shafranov shift stabilization play essential roles in
producing the improved core confinement in both HYBRID and AT
discharges. Shafranov shift stabilization is found to be more important
in AT discharges than in HYBRID discharges. We have also examined the
competition between the stabilizing effects of E × B
shear and Shafranov shift stabilization and the destabilizing effects
of higher safety factors and parallel velocity shear. Linear and
nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations of idealized low and high safety
factor cases reveal some interesting consequences. A low safety factor
(i.e. HYBRID relevant) is directly beneficial in reducing the transport,
and E × B shear stabilization can dominate
parallel velocity shear destabilization allowing the turbulence to be
quenched. However, at low-q/high current, Shafranov shift
stabilization plays less of a role. Higher safety factors (as found in
AT discharges), on the other hand, have larger amounts of Shafranov
shift stabilization, but parallel velocity shear destabilization can
prevent E × B shear quenching of the turbulent transport, and only E × B suppression is achieved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 450 - 458 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Nuclear Fusion |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- JET
- plasma
- fusion energy
- fusion reactors
- ITER
- Tokamak