Trespassing on Finnish railways

Identification of problem sites and characteristics of trespassing behaviour

Anne Silla (Corresponding Author), Juha Luoma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction

This study identified the sites of frequent trespassing on Finnish railways, investigated trespassing behaviour at selected sites, and explored opinions about preventive measures.

Materials and methods

The study consisted of qualitative and quantitative part. The qualitative part included a survey directed at engine drivers and trespassers interviews whereas the quantitative part was constituted by a more detailed analysis on trespasser behaviour and characteristics of trespassers of selected sites. First, sites with frequent trespassing were explored by a survey directed at engine drivers. In addition, the drivers were also asked for suggestions of potential preventive measures. Second, three locations were chosen for a more detailed investigation which included the counting of trespassers. Third, trespassers at these locations were interviewed.

Results

The results of the survey directed at engine drivers revealed approximately 100 problematic sites. On average about 40 daily trespassers could be observed at selected research sites. The trespassers were typically adults and males. The answers from trespasser interviews showed that the main reason for trespassing is taking a short cut. Half of the respondents assessed that the trespassing is safe and 15% assumed that trespassing is legal. Furthermore, they indicated that the most effective measures to prevent trespassing is fencing the tracks or building an underpass. In fact, the engine drivers usually indicated the same measures.

Discussion

In conclusion, various physical measures should be considered as effective and acceptable preventive measures. However, since many trespassers considered trespassing to be safe and assumed that trespassing is legal, it is worth considering information campaigns as an additional preventive measure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-53
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Transport Research Review
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

German Federal Railways
driver
Engines
Underpasses
interview
campaign

Keywords

  • Railway
  • Safety
  • Trespassing
  • Survey
  • Observation
  • Interview

Cite this

@article{a11920527ceb4dc0b412650f6ab88224,
title = "Trespassing on Finnish railways: Identification of problem sites and characteristics of trespassing behaviour",
abstract = "IntroductionThis study identified the sites of frequent trespassing on Finnish railways, investigated trespassing behaviour at selected sites, and explored opinions about preventive measures.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of qualitative and quantitative part. The qualitative part included a survey directed at engine drivers and trespassers interviews whereas the quantitative part was constituted by a more detailed analysis on trespasser behaviour and characteristics of trespassers of selected sites. First, sites with frequent trespassing were explored by a survey directed at engine drivers. In addition, the drivers were also asked for suggestions of potential preventive measures. Second, three locations were chosen for a more detailed investigation which included the counting of trespassers. Third, trespassers at these locations were interviewed.ResultsThe results of the survey directed at engine drivers revealed approximately 100 problematic sites. On average about 40 daily trespassers could be observed at selected research sites. The trespassers were typically adults and males. The answers from trespasser interviews showed that the main reason for trespassing is taking a short cut. Half of the respondents assessed that the trespassing is safe and 15{\%} assumed that trespassing is legal. Furthermore, they indicated that the most effective measures to prevent trespassing is fencing the tracks or building an underpass. In fact, the engine drivers usually indicated the same measures.DiscussionIn conclusion, various physical measures should be considered as effective and acceptable preventive measures. However, since many trespassers considered trespassing to be safe and assumed that trespassing is legal, it is worth considering information campaigns as an additional preventive measure.",
keywords = "Railway, Safety, Trespassing, Survey, Observation, Interview",
author = "Anne Silla and Juha Luoma",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/s12544-008-0005-y",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "47--53",
journal = "European Transport Research Review",
issn = "1867-0717",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Trespassing on Finnish railways : Identification of problem sites and characteristics of trespassing behaviour. / Silla, Anne (Corresponding Author); Luoma, Juha.

In: European Transport Research Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, p. 47-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trespassing on Finnish railways

T2 - Identification of problem sites and characteristics of trespassing behaviour

AU - Silla, Anne

AU - Luoma, Juha

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - IntroductionThis study identified the sites of frequent trespassing on Finnish railways, investigated trespassing behaviour at selected sites, and explored opinions about preventive measures.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of qualitative and quantitative part. The qualitative part included a survey directed at engine drivers and trespassers interviews whereas the quantitative part was constituted by a more detailed analysis on trespasser behaviour and characteristics of trespassers of selected sites. First, sites with frequent trespassing were explored by a survey directed at engine drivers. In addition, the drivers were also asked for suggestions of potential preventive measures. Second, three locations were chosen for a more detailed investigation which included the counting of trespassers. Third, trespassers at these locations were interviewed.ResultsThe results of the survey directed at engine drivers revealed approximately 100 problematic sites. On average about 40 daily trespassers could be observed at selected research sites. The trespassers were typically adults and males. The answers from trespasser interviews showed that the main reason for trespassing is taking a short cut. Half of the respondents assessed that the trespassing is safe and 15% assumed that trespassing is legal. Furthermore, they indicated that the most effective measures to prevent trespassing is fencing the tracks or building an underpass. In fact, the engine drivers usually indicated the same measures.DiscussionIn conclusion, various physical measures should be considered as effective and acceptable preventive measures. However, since many trespassers considered trespassing to be safe and assumed that trespassing is legal, it is worth considering information campaigns as an additional preventive measure.

AB - IntroductionThis study identified the sites of frequent trespassing on Finnish railways, investigated trespassing behaviour at selected sites, and explored opinions about preventive measures.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of qualitative and quantitative part. The qualitative part included a survey directed at engine drivers and trespassers interviews whereas the quantitative part was constituted by a more detailed analysis on trespasser behaviour and characteristics of trespassers of selected sites. First, sites with frequent trespassing were explored by a survey directed at engine drivers. In addition, the drivers were also asked for suggestions of potential preventive measures. Second, three locations were chosen for a more detailed investigation which included the counting of trespassers. Third, trespassers at these locations were interviewed.ResultsThe results of the survey directed at engine drivers revealed approximately 100 problematic sites. On average about 40 daily trespassers could be observed at selected research sites. The trespassers were typically adults and males. The answers from trespasser interviews showed that the main reason for trespassing is taking a short cut. Half of the respondents assessed that the trespassing is safe and 15% assumed that trespassing is legal. Furthermore, they indicated that the most effective measures to prevent trespassing is fencing the tracks or building an underpass. In fact, the engine drivers usually indicated the same measures.DiscussionIn conclusion, various physical measures should be considered as effective and acceptable preventive measures. However, since many trespassers considered trespassing to be safe and assumed that trespassing is legal, it is worth considering information campaigns as an additional preventive measure.

KW - Railway

KW - Safety

KW - Trespassing

KW - Survey

KW - Observation

KW - Interview

U2 - 10.1007/s12544-008-0005-y

DO - 10.1007/s12544-008-0005-y

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 47

EP - 53

JO - European Transport Research Review

JF - European Transport Research Review

SN - 1867-0717

IS - 1

ER -