Uncertainty analysis of phase and amplitude of harmonic components of bearing inner ring four-point roundness measurement

Raine Viitala (Corresponding Author), Thomas Widmaier, Björn Hemming, Kari Tammi, Petri Kuosmanen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The four-point roundness measurement method enables the measurement of roundness without a requirement for a precise rotating motion of the workpiece or a measurement sensor. The four-point roundness measurement method can separate the roundness profile and the motion of the rotating axis of the workpiece. In the present study, the uncertainty of the four-point roundness measurement of a bearing inner ring was analysed. The bearing inner ring was installed in its operating position on the shaft of a large rotor during the measurement in order to investigate the bearing inner ring roundness profile in operating conditions. Since the measurement evaluation using the four-point method is complex, the uncertainty analysis was conducted through a Monte-Carlo simulation, using realistic error sources in typical measurement conditions. The uncertainty of both the amplitude and phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile was analysed for the 2nd till the 30th harmonic component. Attention was directed especially towards the phase of the harmonic components, since the uncertainty of the phase is analysed very little in existing research studies. In addition, the phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile is important when considering compensative precision grinding applications of round workpieces. The results show that below the 10th harmonic component, the maximum amplitude standard uncertainty was circa 0.5 μm, and the maximum phase standard uncertainty was circa 5°. The standard uncertainties of the amplitudes for the complete harmonic component range were below 1.3 μm for odd components and 0.2 μm for even components. The maximum standard uncertainties of the phases for the complete harmonic component range were circa 15° for odd components and circa 5° for even components. The measured roundness profile itself did not have an effect on the uncertainty of the method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-130
Number of pages13
JournalPrecision Engineering
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Bearings (structural)
Uncertainty analysis
Uncertainty
Rotors

Keywords

  • Bearing excitation
  • Four-point method
  • Harmonic component uncertainty
  • Monte-Carlo simulation
  • Odd and even harmonic components
  • Phase uncertainty
  • Three-point method
  • Uncertainty evaluation

Cite this

@article{1ea746d0c2684c20b8a0a9cc36066601,
title = "Uncertainty analysis of phase and amplitude of harmonic components of bearing inner ring four-point roundness measurement",
abstract = "The four-point roundness measurement method enables the measurement of roundness without a requirement for a precise rotating motion of the workpiece or a measurement sensor. The four-point roundness measurement method can separate the roundness profile and the motion of the rotating axis of the workpiece. In the present study, the uncertainty of the four-point roundness measurement of a bearing inner ring was analysed. The bearing inner ring was installed in its operating position on the shaft of a large rotor during the measurement in order to investigate the bearing inner ring roundness profile in operating conditions. Since the measurement evaluation using the four-point method is complex, the uncertainty analysis was conducted through a Monte-Carlo simulation, using realistic error sources in typical measurement conditions. The uncertainty of both the amplitude and phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile was analysed for the 2nd till the 30th harmonic component. Attention was directed especially towards the phase of the harmonic components, since the uncertainty of the phase is analysed very little in existing research studies. In addition, the phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile is important when considering compensative precision grinding applications of round workpieces. The results show that below the 10th harmonic component, the maximum amplitude standard uncertainty was circa 0.5 μm, and the maximum phase standard uncertainty was circa 5°. The standard uncertainties of the amplitudes for the complete harmonic component range were below 1.3 μm for odd components and 0.2 μm for even components. The maximum standard uncertainties of the phases for the complete harmonic component range were circa 15° for odd components and circa 5° for even components. The measured roundness profile itself did not have an effect on the uncertainty of the method.",
keywords = "Bearing excitation, Four-point method, Harmonic component uncertainty, Monte-Carlo simulation, Odd and even harmonic components, Phase uncertainty, Three-point method, Uncertainty evaluation",
author = "Raine Viitala and Thomas Widmaier and Bj{\"o}rn Hemming and Kari Tammi and Petri Kuosmanen",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.05.008",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "118--130",
journal = "Precision Engineering",
issn = "0141-6359",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Uncertainty analysis of phase and amplitude of harmonic components of bearing inner ring four-point roundness measurement. / Viitala, Raine (Corresponding Author); Widmaier, Thomas; Hemming, Björn; Tammi, Kari; Kuosmanen, Petri.

In: Precision Engineering, Vol. 54, 01.10.2018, p. 118-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty analysis of phase and amplitude of harmonic components of bearing inner ring four-point roundness measurement

AU - Viitala, Raine

AU - Widmaier, Thomas

AU - Hemming, Björn

AU - Tammi, Kari

AU - Kuosmanen, Petri

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - The four-point roundness measurement method enables the measurement of roundness without a requirement for a precise rotating motion of the workpiece or a measurement sensor. The four-point roundness measurement method can separate the roundness profile and the motion of the rotating axis of the workpiece. In the present study, the uncertainty of the four-point roundness measurement of a bearing inner ring was analysed. The bearing inner ring was installed in its operating position on the shaft of a large rotor during the measurement in order to investigate the bearing inner ring roundness profile in operating conditions. Since the measurement evaluation using the four-point method is complex, the uncertainty analysis was conducted through a Monte-Carlo simulation, using realistic error sources in typical measurement conditions. The uncertainty of both the amplitude and phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile was analysed for the 2nd till the 30th harmonic component. Attention was directed especially towards the phase of the harmonic components, since the uncertainty of the phase is analysed very little in existing research studies. In addition, the phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile is important when considering compensative precision grinding applications of round workpieces. The results show that below the 10th harmonic component, the maximum amplitude standard uncertainty was circa 0.5 μm, and the maximum phase standard uncertainty was circa 5°. The standard uncertainties of the amplitudes for the complete harmonic component range were below 1.3 μm for odd components and 0.2 μm for even components. The maximum standard uncertainties of the phases for the complete harmonic component range were circa 15° for odd components and circa 5° for even components. The measured roundness profile itself did not have an effect on the uncertainty of the method.

AB - The four-point roundness measurement method enables the measurement of roundness without a requirement for a precise rotating motion of the workpiece or a measurement sensor. The four-point roundness measurement method can separate the roundness profile and the motion of the rotating axis of the workpiece. In the present study, the uncertainty of the four-point roundness measurement of a bearing inner ring was analysed. The bearing inner ring was installed in its operating position on the shaft of a large rotor during the measurement in order to investigate the bearing inner ring roundness profile in operating conditions. Since the measurement evaluation using the four-point method is complex, the uncertainty analysis was conducted through a Monte-Carlo simulation, using realistic error sources in typical measurement conditions. The uncertainty of both the amplitude and phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile was analysed for the 2nd till the 30th harmonic component. Attention was directed especially towards the phase of the harmonic components, since the uncertainty of the phase is analysed very little in existing research studies. In addition, the phase of the harmonic components of the roundness profile is important when considering compensative precision grinding applications of round workpieces. The results show that below the 10th harmonic component, the maximum amplitude standard uncertainty was circa 0.5 μm, and the maximum phase standard uncertainty was circa 5°. The standard uncertainties of the amplitudes for the complete harmonic component range were below 1.3 μm for odd components and 0.2 μm for even components. The maximum standard uncertainties of the phases for the complete harmonic component range were circa 15° for odd components and circa 5° for even components. The measured roundness profile itself did not have an effect on the uncertainty of the method.

KW - Bearing excitation

KW - Four-point method

KW - Harmonic component uncertainty

KW - Monte-Carlo simulation

KW - Odd and even harmonic components

KW - Phase uncertainty

KW - Three-point method

KW - Uncertainty evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047436824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.05.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047436824

VL - 54

SP - 118

EP - 130

JO - Precision Engineering

JF - Precision Engineering

SN - 0141-6359

ER -