Abstract
In the past decades universities have progressively
gained more attention for their roles as economic actors.
Not only are they held responsible for generating
intellectual value, but also for delivering more direct
benefits to both society and economy. Such a wider and,
at the same time, extremely complex new role of
universities poses serious challenges to universities.
They struggle to solve the dilemma of how to make
academic research institutions accelerate the production
of socially and economically relevant knowledge and, at
the same time, improve the quality of knowledge produced,
without restricting the relatively autonomous governance
structures characterising the academic system. The major
challenge that universities face is the integration and
simultaneous accomplishment of their knowledge creation,
knowledge dissemination and knowledge exploitation
functions.
In an endeavour to shed light on such a multifaceted
issue, the present study focuses on the characteristics
and impacts of entrepreneurial university by analysing
the university-industry-government relations and the
university engagement in commercialising research. Using
data from several surveys and interviews conducted with
Finnish university staff and firms participating in the
EU framework programmes, the study highlights the
possible gains, losses and tensions determined by the
entrepreneurial activity of public research institutions,
as well as the significance of universities within the
knowledge production and innovative activities of firms.
The present study further develops Donald Stokes' (1997)
typology concerning the structural, cultural and
organisational elements characterising university's
exploitation of academic research. In order to go beyond
linear thinking and taking into account the cognitive
dimension of integrating academic and utilitarian
demands, the study proposes a conceptual model, which may
represent a useful tool in order to address the
challenges and tensions that the university system faces
when and if engaged in entrepreneurial activities.
Furthermore, it highlights the importance of pluralism
and analyses university's extending role, which goes
beyond research and education and encompasses
dissemination and utilisation of research results, to the
benefit of both the economy and society.
The findings of the study show that scientific and
entrepreneurial goals can be intertwined, although
tensions and conflicts of interest may arise. The latter
may emerge from the confrontation of different research
culture and normative structure, rather than because of
the divergences between basic and applied research.
Knowledge exploitation is a question of reconciling
cognitive differences and emphasising similarities, as
well as balancing different responsibilities and demands.
The bargaining process between university and industry is
important for the success of the collaboration. A mutual
understanding of the project's goals and the creation of
a win-win situation among the partners involved in the
research project are factors that enhance the potential
success of the collaboration. Trust, mutual respect and
understanding seem to be of crucial importance to firms,
when they collaborate with universities. A set of
managerial skills seems to be required to enable the
universities' entrepreneurial behaviour. In fact, those
university institutions that are at ease with the idea of
bringing the work of their researchers into closer
contact with market-oriented industrial R&D projects,
have promoted a business-like management culture and seem
to have an advantage in the research market. In this
respect, the analysis also highlights the importance of
an inspiring and goal-oriented leadership, in order to
facilitate the entrepreneurial activities.
However, it must be noted that not all fields of science
may suitably accomplish an entrepreneurial role, nor do
all academics possess the relevant competencies with
which to carry out some of the entrepreneurial
activities. The entrepreneurial engagement may have some
counterproductive consequences for the university system.
Competitiveness may create disincentives for researchers
to engage in projects where they cannot present
quantifiable outputs. Academics may also become reluctant
to contribute to educational and training tasks and be
less motivated to carry out those research projects with
a long-term horizon.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor Degree |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 28 Jan 2006 |
Place of Publication | Espoo |
Publisher | |
Print ISBNs | 951-38-6690-4 |
Electronic ISBNs | 951-38-6691-2 |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
MoE publication type | G4 Doctoral dissertation (monograph) |
Keywords
- entrepreneurial universities
- academic research
- knowledge creation
- knowledge dissemination
- knowledge exploitation
- SMEs
- academic rationale
- economic rationale
- societal rationale
- innovation activities