Use of the Master Curve Methodology for Real Three Dimensional Cracks

Kim Wallin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

At VTT, development work has been in progress for 15 years to develop and validate testing and analysis methods applicable for fracture resistance determination from small material samples. The VTT approach is a holistic approach by which to determine static, dynamic and crack arrest fracture toughness properties either directly or by correlations from small material samples. The development work has evolved a testing standard for fracture toughness testing in the transition region. The standard, known as the Master Curve standard is in a way “first of a kind”, since it includes guidelines on how to properly treat the test data for use in structural integrity assessment. No standard, so far, has done this. The standard is based on the VTT approach, but presently, the VTT approach goes beyond the standard. Key components in the standard are statistical expressions for describing the data scatter, and for predicting a specimens size (crack front length) effect and an expression (Master Curve) for the fracture toughness temperature dependence. The standard and the approach, it is based upon, can be considered to represent the state of the art of small specimen fracture toughness characterization. Normally, the Master Curve parameters are determined using test specimens with “straight” crack fronts and comparatively uniform stress state along the crack front. This enables the use of a single KI value and single constraint value to describe the whole specimen. For a real crack in a structure, this is usually not the case. Normally, both KI and constraint vary along the crack front and in the case of a thermal shock, even the temperature will vary along the crack front. A proper means of applying the Master Curve methodology for such cases is presented here.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1388-1394
JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
Volume237
Issue number12-13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed
Event18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, SMiRT 18 - Beijing, China
Duration: 7 Aug 200512 Aug 2005

Fingerprint

crack
cracks
methodology
Cracks
fracture strength
fracture toughness
Fracture toughness
curves
Testing
crack arrest
thermal shock
holistic approach
Thermal shock
Structural integrity
integrity
temperature
Temperature
temperature dependence

Keywords

  • Master Curve
  • 3D-cracks
  • brittle fracture
  • constraint

Cite this

@article{0802ff5bfb1649c38e604469dfd3f345,
title = "Use of the Master Curve Methodology for Real Three Dimensional Cracks",
abstract = "At VTT, development work has been in progress for 15 years to develop and validate testing and analysis methods applicable for fracture resistance determination from small material samples. The VTT approach is a holistic approach by which to determine static, dynamic and crack arrest fracture toughness properties either directly or by correlations from small material samples. The development work has evolved a testing standard for fracture toughness testing in the transition region. The standard, known as the Master Curve standard is in a way “first of a kind”, since it includes guidelines on how to properly treat the test data for use in structural integrity assessment. No standard, so far, has done this. The standard is based on the VTT approach, but presently, the VTT approach goes beyond the standard. Key components in the standard are statistical expressions for describing the data scatter, and for predicting a specimens size (crack front length) effect and an expression (Master Curve) for the fracture toughness temperature dependence. The standard and the approach, it is based upon, can be considered to represent the state of the art of small specimen fracture toughness characterization. Normally, the Master Curve parameters are determined using test specimens with “straight” crack fronts and comparatively uniform stress state along the crack front. This enables the use of a single KI value and single constraint value to describe the whole specimen. For a real crack in a structure, this is usually not the case. Normally, both KI and constraint vary along the crack front and in the case of a thermal shock, even the temperature will vary along the crack front. A proper means of applying the Master Curve methodology for such cases is presented here.",
keywords = "Master Curve, 3D-cracks, brittle fracture, constraint",
author = "Kim Wallin",
note = "CA2: TUO7 CA: TUO Project code: G5SU01067",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.034",
language = "English",
volume = "237",
pages = "1388--1394",
journal = "Nuclear Engineering and Design",
issn = "0029-5493",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "12-13",

}

Use of the Master Curve Methodology for Real Three Dimensional Cracks. / Wallin, Kim.

In: Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 237, No. 12-13, 2006, p. 1388-1394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the Master Curve Methodology for Real Three Dimensional Cracks

AU - Wallin, Kim

N1 - CA2: TUO7 CA: TUO Project code: G5SU01067

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - At VTT, development work has been in progress for 15 years to develop and validate testing and analysis methods applicable for fracture resistance determination from small material samples. The VTT approach is a holistic approach by which to determine static, dynamic and crack arrest fracture toughness properties either directly or by correlations from small material samples. The development work has evolved a testing standard for fracture toughness testing in the transition region. The standard, known as the Master Curve standard is in a way “first of a kind”, since it includes guidelines on how to properly treat the test data for use in structural integrity assessment. No standard, so far, has done this. The standard is based on the VTT approach, but presently, the VTT approach goes beyond the standard. Key components in the standard are statistical expressions for describing the data scatter, and for predicting a specimens size (crack front length) effect and an expression (Master Curve) for the fracture toughness temperature dependence. The standard and the approach, it is based upon, can be considered to represent the state of the art of small specimen fracture toughness characterization. Normally, the Master Curve parameters are determined using test specimens with “straight” crack fronts and comparatively uniform stress state along the crack front. This enables the use of a single KI value and single constraint value to describe the whole specimen. For a real crack in a structure, this is usually not the case. Normally, both KI and constraint vary along the crack front and in the case of a thermal shock, even the temperature will vary along the crack front. A proper means of applying the Master Curve methodology for such cases is presented here.

AB - At VTT, development work has been in progress for 15 years to develop and validate testing and analysis methods applicable for fracture resistance determination from small material samples. The VTT approach is a holistic approach by which to determine static, dynamic and crack arrest fracture toughness properties either directly or by correlations from small material samples. The development work has evolved a testing standard for fracture toughness testing in the transition region. The standard, known as the Master Curve standard is in a way “first of a kind”, since it includes guidelines on how to properly treat the test data for use in structural integrity assessment. No standard, so far, has done this. The standard is based on the VTT approach, but presently, the VTT approach goes beyond the standard. Key components in the standard are statistical expressions for describing the data scatter, and for predicting a specimens size (crack front length) effect and an expression (Master Curve) for the fracture toughness temperature dependence. The standard and the approach, it is based upon, can be considered to represent the state of the art of small specimen fracture toughness characterization. Normally, the Master Curve parameters are determined using test specimens with “straight” crack fronts and comparatively uniform stress state along the crack front. This enables the use of a single KI value and single constraint value to describe the whole specimen. For a real crack in a structure, this is usually not the case. Normally, both KI and constraint vary along the crack front and in the case of a thermal shock, even the temperature will vary along the crack front. A proper means of applying the Master Curve methodology for such cases is presented here.

KW - Master Curve

KW - 3D-cracks

KW - brittle fracture

KW - constraint

U2 - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.034

DO - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.034

M3 - Article

VL - 237

SP - 1388

EP - 1394

JO - Nuclear Engineering and Design

JF - Nuclear Engineering and Design

SN - 0029-5493

IS - 12-13

ER -