User experience: Does it matter in complex systems?

Paula Savioja (Corresponding Author), Marja Liinasuo, Hanna Koskinen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-449
Number of pages20
JournalCognition, Technology and Work
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Large scale systems
Nuclear energy
Complex Systems
User Experience

Keywords

  • User Experience (UX)
  • Complex Systems
  • Control Room
  • Evaluation

Cite this

@article{7732b7576c5e4ffabf1b0f9a9861ae9c,
title = "User experience: Does it matter in complex systems?",
abstract = "This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.",
keywords = "User Experience (UX), Complex Systems, Control Room, Evaluation",
author = "Paula Savioja and Marja Liinasuo and Hanna Koskinen",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s10111-013-0271-x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "429--449",
journal = "Cognition, Technology and Work",
issn = "1435-5558",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

User experience : Does it matter in complex systems? / Savioja, Paula (Corresponding Author); Liinasuo, Marja; Koskinen, Hanna.

In: Cognition, Technology and Work, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2013, p. 429-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - User experience

T2 - Does it matter in complex systems?

AU - Savioja, Paula

AU - Liinasuo, Marja

AU - Koskinen, Hanna

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.

AB - This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.

KW - User Experience (UX)

KW - Complex Systems

KW - Control Room

KW - Evaluation

U2 - 10.1007/s10111-013-0271-x

DO - 10.1007/s10111-013-0271-x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 429

EP - 449

JO - Cognition, Technology and Work

JF - Cognition, Technology and Work

SN - 1435-5558

IS - 4

ER -