User experience: Does it matter in complex systems?

Paula Savioja (Corresponding Author), Marja Liinasuo, Hanna Koskinen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)429-449
    Number of pages20
    JournalCognition, Technology and Work
    Volume16
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Large scale systems
    Nuclear energy
    Complex Systems
    User Experience

    Keywords

    • User Experience (UX)
    • Complex Systems
    • Control Room
    • Evaluation

    Cite this

    @article{7732b7576c5e4ffabf1b0f9a9861ae9c,
    title = "User experience: Does it matter in complex systems?",
    abstract = "This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.",
    keywords = "User Experience (UX), Complex Systems, Control Room, Evaluation",
    author = "Paula Savioja and Marja Liinasuo and Hanna Koskinen",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1007/s10111-013-0271-x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "429--449",
    journal = "Cognition, Technology and Work",
    issn = "1435-5558",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "4",

    }

    User experience : Does it matter in complex systems? / Savioja, Paula (Corresponding Author); Liinasuo, Marja; Koskinen, Hanna.

    In: Cognition, Technology and Work, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2013, p. 429-449.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - User experience

    T2 - Does it matter in complex systems?

    AU - Savioja, Paula

    AU - Liinasuo, Marja

    AU - Koskinen, Hanna

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.

    AB - This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human–computer interaction and related research fields, it is a valid question, whether the concept could bring something new to the research concerning complex safety–critical systems also. In this paper, we introduce the concept of UX as an indicator of the users’ subjective feeling of the appropriateness of the proposed tool for the activity. Based on activity theoretical contemplation, we presume that UX is grounded in the feelings and emotions evoked in the usage of the systems and which concern the status of the whole activity. In the paper, a theory-based characterization of UXs in the particular domain is developed based on three general functions of a tool: instrument, psychological, and communicative. We present the operationalization of UX and three studies in which UXs concerning different control room systems during a control room transformation process were followed. Based on the results of the three studies, we find that the significance of UX as an indicator of quality in use lies in the ability to bring the professional users’ experiences, which are embedded in the inner characteristics of the work and not always observable by external evaluators, to the process of designing new systems. Evidence to support the initial background assumption that UXs may concern instrumental aspects of tools was identified in the studies.

    KW - User Experience (UX)

    KW - Complex Systems

    KW - Control Room

    KW - Evaluation

    U2 - 10.1007/s10111-013-0271-x

    DO - 10.1007/s10111-013-0271-x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 429

    EP - 449

    JO - Cognition, Technology and Work

    JF - Cognition, Technology and Work

    SN - 1435-5558

    IS - 4

    ER -