Abstract
A data set of five transients at different VVER type nuclear power
plants was collected in order to validate neutron kinetics/thermal
hydraulics codes. Two of these transients ‘drop of control rod at
nominal power at Bohunice-3’ of VVER-440 type and ‘coast-down of 1 from 3
working MCPs at Kozloduy-6’ of VVER-1000 type, were then utilised for
code validation. Eight institutes contributed to the validation with 10
calculations using 5 different combinations of coupled codes. The
thermal hydraulic codes were ATHLET, SMABRE and RELAP5 and the neutron
kinetic codes DYN3D, HEXTRAN, KIKO3D and BIPR8. The general behaviour of
both the transients was quite well calculated with all the codes. Even
an elementary modelling of coolant mixing in reactor pressure vessel
under asymmetric transients improved correspondence to the measurements.
Some differences between the calculations seem to indicate that fuel
modelling and treatment of VVER-440 control rods need further
consideration. The simultaneous validation interacted with the data
collection effort and thus improved its quality. The complexity of data
collection systems and sometimes conflicting data, however, called for
compromises and interpretation guides that also taught the analysts
balanced plant modelling.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 507 - 519 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Nuclear Engineering and Design |
Volume | 235 |
Issue number | 2-4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- nuclear power plants
- nuclear reactor safety
- nuclear safety
- validation
- code validation
- pressurized water reactors