Validation of proposed prostate cancer biomarkers with gene expression data: a long road to travel

Adriana Amaro, Alessia Isabella Esposito, Anna Gallina, Matthias Nees, Giovanna Angelini, Adriana Albini (Corresponding Author), Ulrich Pfeffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biomarkers are important for early detection of cancer, prognosis, response prediction, and detection of residual or relapsing disease. Special attention has been given to diagnostic markers for prostate cancer since it is thought that early detection and surgery might reduce prostate cancer-specific mortality. The use of prostate-specific antigen, PSA (KLK3), has been debated on the base of cohort studies that show that its use in preventive screenings only marginally influences mortality from prostate cancer. Many groups have identified alternative or additional markers, among which PCA3, in order to detect early prostate cancer through screening, to distinguish potentially lethal from indolent prostate cancers, and to guide the treatment decision. The large number of markers proposed has led us to the present study in which we analyze these indicators for their diagnostic and prognostic potential using publicly available genomic data. We identified 380 markers from literature analysis on 20,000 articles on prostate cancer markers. The most interesting ones appeared to be claudin 3 (CLDN3) and alpha-methysacyl-CoA racemase highly expressed in prostate cancer and filamin C (FLNC) and keratin 5 with highest expression in normal prostate tissue. None of the markers proposed can compete with PSA for tissue specificity. The indicators proposed generally show a great variability of expression in normal and tumor tissue or are expressed at similar levels in other tissues. Those proposed as prognostic markers distinguish cases with marginally different risk of progression and appear to have a clinically limited use. We used data sets sampling 152 prostate tissues, data sets with 281 prostate cancers analyzed by microarray analysis and a study of integrated genomics on 218 cases to develop a multigene score. A multivariate model that combines several indicators increases the discrimination power but does not add impressively to the information obtained from Gleason scoring. This analysis of 10 years of marker research suggests that diagnostic and prognostic testing is more difficult in prostate cancer than in other neoplasms and that we must continue to search for better candidates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-671
JournalCancer and Metastasis Reviews
Volume33
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Tumor Biomarkers
Prostatic Neoplasms
Gene Expression
Early Detection of Cancer
Prostate
Claudin-3
Filamins
Keratin-5
Racemases and Epimerases
Organ Specificity
Mortality
Coenzyme A
Microarray Analysis
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Genomics
Neoplasms
Cohort Studies
Biomarkers
Research

Keywords

  • Biomakers
  • multivariae model
  • prognostic signature
  • prostate cancer
  • PSA

Cite this

Amaro, A., Esposito, A. I., Gallina, A., Nees, M., Angelini, G., Albini, A., & Pfeffer, U. (2014). Validation of proposed prostate cancer biomarkers with gene expression data: a long road to travel. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 33(2-3), 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-013-9470-4
Amaro, Adriana ; Esposito, Alessia Isabella ; Gallina, Anna ; Nees, Matthias ; Angelini, Giovanna ; Albini, Adriana ; Pfeffer, Ulrich. / Validation of proposed prostate cancer biomarkers with gene expression data: a long road to travel. In: Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 2-3. pp. 657-671.
@article{95dcf428df5a489d82da6c2b47b28a3c,
title = "Validation of proposed prostate cancer biomarkers with gene expression data: a long road to travel",
abstract = "Biomarkers are important for early detection of cancer, prognosis, response prediction, and detection of residual or relapsing disease. Special attention has been given to diagnostic markers for prostate cancer since it is thought that early detection and surgery might reduce prostate cancer-specific mortality. The use of prostate-specific antigen, PSA (KLK3), has been debated on the base of cohort studies that show that its use in preventive screenings only marginally influences mortality from prostate cancer. Many groups have identified alternative or additional markers, among which PCA3, in order to detect early prostate cancer through screening, to distinguish potentially lethal from indolent prostate cancers, and to guide the treatment decision. The large number of markers proposed has led us to the present study in which we analyze these indicators for their diagnostic and prognostic potential using publicly available genomic data. We identified 380 markers from literature analysis on 20,000 articles on prostate cancer markers. The most interesting ones appeared to be claudin 3 (CLDN3) and alpha-methysacyl-CoA racemase highly expressed in prostate cancer and filamin C (FLNC) and keratin 5 with highest expression in normal prostate tissue. None of the markers proposed can compete with PSA for tissue specificity. The indicators proposed generally show a great variability of expression in normal and tumor tissue or are expressed at similar levels in other tissues. Those proposed as prognostic markers distinguish cases with marginally different risk of progression and appear to have a clinically limited use. We used data sets sampling 152 prostate tissues, data sets with 281 prostate cancers analyzed by microarray analysis and a study of integrated genomics on 218 cases to develop a multigene score. A multivariate model that combines several indicators increases the discrimination power but does not add impressively to the information obtained from Gleason scoring. This analysis of 10 years of marker research suggests that diagnostic and prognostic testing is more difficult in prostate cancer than in other neoplasms and that we must continue to search for better candidates.",
keywords = "Biomakers, multivariae model, prognostic signature, prostate cancer, PSA",
author = "Adriana Amaro and Esposito, {Alessia Isabella} and Anna Gallina and Matthias Nees and Giovanna Angelini and Adriana Albini and Ulrich Pfeffer",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10555-013-9470-4",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "657--671",
journal = "Cancer and Metastasis Reviews",
issn = "0167-7659",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2-3",

}

Amaro, A, Esposito, AI, Gallina, A, Nees, M, Angelini, G, Albini, A & Pfeffer, U 2014, 'Validation of proposed prostate cancer biomarkers with gene expression data: a long road to travel', Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 33, no. 2-3, pp. 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-013-9470-4

Validation of proposed prostate cancer biomarkers with gene expression data: a long road to travel. / Amaro, Adriana; Esposito, Alessia Isabella; Gallina, Anna; Nees, Matthias; Angelini, Giovanna; Albini, Adriana (Corresponding Author); Pfeffer, Ulrich.

In: Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, Vol. 33, No. 2-3, 2014, p. 657-671.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of proposed prostate cancer biomarkers with gene expression data: a long road to travel

AU - Amaro, Adriana

AU - Esposito, Alessia Isabella

AU - Gallina, Anna

AU - Nees, Matthias

AU - Angelini, Giovanna

AU - Albini, Adriana

AU - Pfeffer, Ulrich

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Biomarkers are important for early detection of cancer, prognosis, response prediction, and detection of residual or relapsing disease. Special attention has been given to diagnostic markers for prostate cancer since it is thought that early detection and surgery might reduce prostate cancer-specific mortality. The use of prostate-specific antigen, PSA (KLK3), has been debated on the base of cohort studies that show that its use in preventive screenings only marginally influences mortality from prostate cancer. Many groups have identified alternative or additional markers, among which PCA3, in order to detect early prostate cancer through screening, to distinguish potentially lethal from indolent prostate cancers, and to guide the treatment decision. The large number of markers proposed has led us to the present study in which we analyze these indicators for their diagnostic and prognostic potential using publicly available genomic data. We identified 380 markers from literature analysis on 20,000 articles on prostate cancer markers. The most interesting ones appeared to be claudin 3 (CLDN3) and alpha-methysacyl-CoA racemase highly expressed in prostate cancer and filamin C (FLNC) and keratin 5 with highest expression in normal prostate tissue. None of the markers proposed can compete with PSA for tissue specificity. The indicators proposed generally show a great variability of expression in normal and tumor tissue or are expressed at similar levels in other tissues. Those proposed as prognostic markers distinguish cases with marginally different risk of progression and appear to have a clinically limited use. We used data sets sampling 152 prostate tissues, data sets with 281 prostate cancers analyzed by microarray analysis and a study of integrated genomics on 218 cases to develop a multigene score. A multivariate model that combines several indicators increases the discrimination power but does not add impressively to the information obtained from Gleason scoring. This analysis of 10 years of marker research suggests that diagnostic and prognostic testing is more difficult in prostate cancer than in other neoplasms and that we must continue to search for better candidates.

AB - Biomarkers are important for early detection of cancer, prognosis, response prediction, and detection of residual or relapsing disease. Special attention has been given to diagnostic markers for prostate cancer since it is thought that early detection and surgery might reduce prostate cancer-specific mortality. The use of prostate-specific antigen, PSA (KLK3), has been debated on the base of cohort studies that show that its use in preventive screenings only marginally influences mortality from prostate cancer. Many groups have identified alternative or additional markers, among which PCA3, in order to detect early prostate cancer through screening, to distinguish potentially lethal from indolent prostate cancers, and to guide the treatment decision. The large number of markers proposed has led us to the present study in which we analyze these indicators for their diagnostic and prognostic potential using publicly available genomic data. We identified 380 markers from literature analysis on 20,000 articles on prostate cancer markers. The most interesting ones appeared to be claudin 3 (CLDN3) and alpha-methysacyl-CoA racemase highly expressed in prostate cancer and filamin C (FLNC) and keratin 5 with highest expression in normal prostate tissue. None of the markers proposed can compete with PSA for tissue specificity. The indicators proposed generally show a great variability of expression in normal and tumor tissue or are expressed at similar levels in other tissues. Those proposed as prognostic markers distinguish cases with marginally different risk of progression and appear to have a clinically limited use. We used data sets sampling 152 prostate tissues, data sets with 281 prostate cancers analyzed by microarray analysis and a study of integrated genomics on 218 cases to develop a multigene score. A multivariate model that combines several indicators increases the discrimination power but does not add impressively to the information obtained from Gleason scoring. This analysis of 10 years of marker research suggests that diagnostic and prognostic testing is more difficult in prostate cancer than in other neoplasms and that we must continue to search for better candidates.

KW - Biomakers

KW - multivariae model

KW - prognostic signature

KW - prostate cancer

KW - PSA

U2 - 10.1007/s10555-013-9470-4

DO - 10.1007/s10555-013-9470-4

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 657

EP - 671

JO - Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

JF - Cancer and Metastasis Reviews

SN - 0167-7659

IS - 2-3

ER -