Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    22 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The FINIX fuel performance code has been developed at VTT to be coupled to existing thermal-hydraulics, reactor dynamics or neutronics codes used at VTT. In this report, the FINIX model is validated against experimental data from the OECD/NEA International Fuel Performance Experiments database. Transient scenarios used in the FRAPTRAN-1.4 integral assessment are used to compare transient performance of FINIX against the results calculated by FRAPTRAN. FRAPTRAN is a computer code for transient analysis of fuel rods developed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the US.

    The comparisons to experimental data offer the best insight into how the FINIX model reflects real-world situations. When comparing the results calculated by FINIX to those calculated by another code, the assumptions and simplifications in the other code must be taken into account. Therefore during the validation process some investigation is done into FRAPTRAN as to clarify the manner in which FRAPTRAN calculates its results.

    According to the validation results, FINIX calculates very similar results compared to FRAPTRAN. Some differences arise due to, for example, FINIX’s lack of plastic clad deformation models and rod failure criteria. However, despite these differences, the temperature distributions match very closely. When compared to experimental steady state irradiation data, the error between computed and experimental centreline temperature increases with burnup. This can be explained by the lack of models for some burnup-dependent phenomena. Some open questions remain concerning the mechanical model in FINIX.
    Original languageEnglish
    PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
    Number of pages78
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2013
    MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

    Publication series

    SeriesVTT Research Report
    NumberVTT-R-06565-13

    Fingerprint

    Transient analysis
    Temperature distribution
    Hydraulics
    Irradiation
    Plastics
    Experiments
    Temperature
    Hot Temperature

    Keywords

    • fuel behaviour modelling
    • FINIX
    • validation

    Cite this

    Loukusa, H. (2013). Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Research Report, No. VTT-R-06565-13
    Loukusa, Henri. / Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2013. 78 p. (VTT Research Report; No. VTT-R-06565-13).
    @book{2b621ed7aa1c45ff848e996d6bcdba5a,
    title = "Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9",
    abstract = "The FINIX fuel performance code has been developed at VTT to be coupled to existing thermal-hydraulics, reactor dynamics or neutronics codes used at VTT. In this report, the FINIX model is validated against experimental data from the OECD/NEA International Fuel Performance Experiments database. Transient scenarios used in the FRAPTRAN-1.4 integral assessment are used to compare transient performance of FINIX against the results calculated by FRAPTRAN. FRAPTRAN is a computer code for transient analysis of fuel rods developed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the US.The comparisons to experimental data offer the best insight into how the FINIX model reflects real-world situations. When comparing the results calculated by FINIX to those calculated by another code, the assumptions and simplifications in the other code must be taken into account. Therefore during the validation process some investigation is done into FRAPTRAN as to clarify the manner in which FRAPTRAN calculates its results.According to the validation results, FINIX calculates very similar results compared to FRAPTRAN. Some differences arise due to, for example, FINIX’s lack of plastic clad deformation models and rod failure criteria. However, despite these differences, the temperature distributions match very closely. When compared to experimental steady state irradiation data, the error between computed and experimental centreline temperature increases with burnup. This can be explained by the lack of models for some burnup-dependent phenomena. Some open questions remain concerning the mechanical model in FINIX.",
    keywords = "fuel behaviour modelling, FINIX, validation",
    author = "Henri Loukusa",
    year = "2013",
    month = "10",
    day = "25",
    language = "English",
    series = "VTT Research Report",
    publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
    number = "VTT-R-06565-13",
    address = "Finland",

    }

    Loukusa, H 2013, Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9. VTT Research Report, no. VTT-R-06565-13, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.

    Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9. / Loukusa, Henri.

    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2013. 78 p. (VTT Research Report; No. VTT-R-06565-13).

    Research output: Book/ReportReport

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9

    AU - Loukusa, Henri

    PY - 2013/10/25

    Y1 - 2013/10/25

    N2 - The FINIX fuel performance code has been developed at VTT to be coupled to existing thermal-hydraulics, reactor dynamics or neutronics codes used at VTT. In this report, the FINIX model is validated against experimental data from the OECD/NEA International Fuel Performance Experiments database. Transient scenarios used in the FRAPTRAN-1.4 integral assessment are used to compare transient performance of FINIX against the results calculated by FRAPTRAN. FRAPTRAN is a computer code for transient analysis of fuel rods developed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the US.The comparisons to experimental data offer the best insight into how the FINIX model reflects real-world situations. When comparing the results calculated by FINIX to those calculated by another code, the assumptions and simplifications in the other code must be taken into account. Therefore during the validation process some investigation is done into FRAPTRAN as to clarify the manner in which FRAPTRAN calculates its results.According to the validation results, FINIX calculates very similar results compared to FRAPTRAN. Some differences arise due to, for example, FINIX’s lack of plastic clad deformation models and rod failure criteria. However, despite these differences, the temperature distributions match very closely. When compared to experimental steady state irradiation data, the error between computed and experimental centreline temperature increases with burnup. This can be explained by the lack of models for some burnup-dependent phenomena. Some open questions remain concerning the mechanical model in FINIX.

    AB - The FINIX fuel performance code has been developed at VTT to be coupled to existing thermal-hydraulics, reactor dynamics or neutronics codes used at VTT. In this report, the FINIX model is validated against experimental data from the OECD/NEA International Fuel Performance Experiments database. Transient scenarios used in the FRAPTRAN-1.4 integral assessment are used to compare transient performance of FINIX against the results calculated by FRAPTRAN. FRAPTRAN is a computer code for transient analysis of fuel rods developed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the US.The comparisons to experimental data offer the best insight into how the FINIX model reflects real-world situations. When comparing the results calculated by FINIX to those calculated by another code, the assumptions and simplifications in the other code must be taken into account. Therefore during the validation process some investigation is done into FRAPTRAN as to clarify the manner in which FRAPTRAN calculates its results.According to the validation results, FINIX calculates very similar results compared to FRAPTRAN. Some differences arise due to, for example, FINIX’s lack of plastic clad deformation models and rod failure criteria. However, despite these differences, the temperature distributions match very closely. When compared to experimental steady state irradiation data, the error between computed and experimental centreline temperature increases with burnup. This can be explained by the lack of models for some burnup-dependent phenomena. Some open questions remain concerning the mechanical model in FINIX.

    KW - fuel behaviour modelling

    KW - FINIX

    KW - validation

    M3 - Report

    T3 - VTT Research Report

    BT - Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9

    PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    ER -

    Loukusa H. Validation of the FINIX fuel behavior code version 0.13.9. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2013. 78 p. (VTT Research Report; No. VTT-R-06565-13).