Validation of the microbiological methods hygicult dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing in surface hygiene control: A Nordic collaborative study

Satu Salo (Corresponding Author), Annikki Laine, Timo Alanko, Anna-Maija Sjöberg, Gun Wirtanen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A collaborative study on total aerobic bacterial count was conducted to validate the Hygicult® TPC dipslide against contact plates and swabbing, using stainless-steel surfaces artificially contaminated with different microbes at various levels. Twelve laboratories took part in the validation procedure. The total number of collaborative samples was 108. The microbial level in each sample was assessed in triplicate using the 3 above-mentioned methods under 3 different incubation conditions (at 25 ± 1°C for 48 and 72 h and at 30 ± 1°C for 48 h). Surface sampling methods detached 25–30% at the lowest (theoretical yield, 1.4 cfu/cm2), 18–20% at the middle (theoretical yield, 10.7 cfu/cm2), and 16–21% at the highest (theoretical yield, 43.6 cfu/cm2) levels of microbes from the test surfaces. The percentage of acceptable results after removing outliers was 89%. Repeatability standard deviations ranged from 27.2 to 74.6% and reproducibility standard deviations ranged from 42.1 to 97.5%. There were no significant differences between results obtained at different incubation temperatures (25 and 30°C) or incubation times (48 and 72 h) for all 3 methods. The Hygicult TPC dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing methods gave similar results at all 3 microbial levels tested: 0.35–0.43 cfu/cm2 at the lowest level, 1.9–2.2 cfu/cm2 at the middle level, and 7.1–9.1 cfu/cm2 at the highest level.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1357 - 1365
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of AOAC International
Volume83
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2000
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

hygiene
Hygiene
incubation
Stainless Steel
microorganisms
stainless steel
outlier
methodology
sampling
reproducibility
plate count
repeatability
Bacterial Load
Sampling
steel
method
Temperature
temperature
testing

Cite this

@article{5cb5f938b58740b3b644f1ff042a884e,
title = "Validation of the microbiological methods hygicult dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing in surface hygiene control: A Nordic collaborative study",
abstract = "A collaborative study on total aerobic bacterial count was conducted to validate the Hygicult{\circledR} TPC dipslide against contact plates and swabbing, using stainless-steel surfaces artificially contaminated with different microbes at various levels. Twelve laboratories took part in the validation procedure. The total number of collaborative samples was 108. The microbial level in each sample was assessed in triplicate using the 3 above-mentioned methods under 3 different incubation conditions (at 25 ± 1°C for 48 and 72 h and at 30 ± 1°C for 48 h). Surface sampling methods detached 25–30{\%} at the lowest (theoretical yield, 1.4 cfu/cm2), 18–20{\%} at the middle (theoretical yield, 10.7 cfu/cm2), and 16–21{\%} at the highest (theoretical yield, 43.6 cfu/cm2) levels of microbes from the test surfaces. The percentage of acceptable results after removing outliers was 89{\%}. Repeatability standard deviations ranged from 27.2 to 74.6{\%} and reproducibility standard deviations ranged from 42.1 to 97.5{\%}. There were no significant differences between results obtained at different incubation temperatures (25 and 30°C) or incubation times (48 and 72 h) for all 3 methods. The Hygicult TPC dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing methods gave similar results at all 3 microbial levels tested: 0.35–0.43 cfu/cm2 at the lowest level, 1.9–2.2 cfu/cm2 at the middle level, and 7.1–9.1 cfu/cm2 at the highest level.",
author = "Satu Salo and Annikki Laine and Timo Alanko and Anna-Maija Sj{\"o}berg and Gun Wirtanen",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "1357 -- 1365",
journal = "Journal of AOAC International",
issn = "1060-3271",
publisher = "AOAC International",
number = "6",

}

Validation of the microbiological methods hygicult dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing in surface hygiene control : A Nordic collaborative study. / Salo, Satu (Corresponding Author); Laine, Annikki; Alanko, Timo; Sjöberg, Anna-Maija; Wirtanen, Gun.

In: Journal of AOAC International, Vol. 83, No. 6, 2000, p. 1357 - 1365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the microbiological methods hygicult dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing in surface hygiene control

T2 - A Nordic collaborative study

AU - Salo, Satu

AU - Laine, Annikki

AU - Alanko, Timo

AU - Sjöberg, Anna-Maija

AU - Wirtanen, Gun

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - A collaborative study on total aerobic bacterial count was conducted to validate the Hygicult® TPC dipslide against contact plates and swabbing, using stainless-steel surfaces artificially contaminated with different microbes at various levels. Twelve laboratories took part in the validation procedure. The total number of collaborative samples was 108. The microbial level in each sample was assessed in triplicate using the 3 above-mentioned methods under 3 different incubation conditions (at 25 ± 1°C for 48 and 72 h and at 30 ± 1°C for 48 h). Surface sampling methods detached 25–30% at the lowest (theoretical yield, 1.4 cfu/cm2), 18–20% at the middle (theoretical yield, 10.7 cfu/cm2), and 16–21% at the highest (theoretical yield, 43.6 cfu/cm2) levels of microbes from the test surfaces. The percentage of acceptable results after removing outliers was 89%. Repeatability standard deviations ranged from 27.2 to 74.6% and reproducibility standard deviations ranged from 42.1 to 97.5%. There were no significant differences between results obtained at different incubation temperatures (25 and 30°C) or incubation times (48 and 72 h) for all 3 methods. The Hygicult TPC dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing methods gave similar results at all 3 microbial levels tested: 0.35–0.43 cfu/cm2 at the lowest level, 1.9–2.2 cfu/cm2 at the middle level, and 7.1–9.1 cfu/cm2 at the highest level.

AB - A collaborative study on total aerobic bacterial count was conducted to validate the Hygicult® TPC dipslide against contact plates and swabbing, using stainless-steel surfaces artificially contaminated with different microbes at various levels. Twelve laboratories took part in the validation procedure. The total number of collaborative samples was 108. The microbial level in each sample was assessed in triplicate using the 3 above-mentioned methods under 3 different incubation conditions (at 25 ± 1°C for 48 and 72 h and at 30 ± 1°C for 48 h). Surface sampling methods detached 25–30% at the lowest (theoretical yield, 1.4 cfu/cm2), 18–20% at the middle (theoretical yield, 10.7 cfu/cm2), and 16–21% at the highest (theoretical yield, 43.6 cfu/cm2) levels of microbes from the test surfaces. The percentage of acceptable results after removing outliers was 89%. Repeatability standard deviations ranged from 27.2 to 74.6% and reproducibility standard deviations ranged from 42.1 to 97.5%. There were no significant differences between results obtained at different incubation temperatures (25 and 30°C) or incubation times (48 and 72 h) for all 3 methods. The Hygicult TPC dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing methods gave similar results at all 3 microbial levels tested: 0.35–0.43 cfu/cm2 at the lowest level, 1.9–2.2 cfu/cm2 at the middle level, and 7.1–9.1 cfu/cm2 at the highest level.

UR - http://fooddiagnostics.dk/upload/files/Brochurer/Orion/Validatio_of_the_Microbiological_Methods_Hygicult_Dipslide_Contact_Plate.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 1357

EP - 1365

JO - Journal of AOAC International

JF - Journal of AOAC International

SN - 1060-3271

IS - 6

ER -