We need a theory of construction

Lauri Koskela

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference articleScientific

Abstract

The guidelines for White Papers for Berkeley-Stanford CE&M workshop suggest deriving research needs from the practical needs of the industry. Generally, this is a sound approach. However, I would like to propose that at this particular moment, thinking in the opposite direction is as, or even more important. My vision is that during the next decade, the formation of a theory of construction will be the single most important force influencing the construction industry. Such a theory of construction will consists of two parts, firstly a theory of production in general and secondly the application of this theory to the characteristics of construction. Presently, there is no commonly accepted theory of production (Heim & Compton 1992). However, I argue that the various existing theoretical strands can be integrated into a useful theoretical framework, which will give direction for further clarification and experimentation and which is applicable also to construction. In the following, this vision is
grounded in more detail.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 1999
MoE publication typeNot Eligible
EventBerkeley-Stanford CE&M Workshop: Defining a Research Agenda for AEC Process/Product Development in 2000 and Beyond - Berkeley, United States
Duration: 26 Aug 199928 Aug 1999

Workshop

WorkshopBerkeley-Stanford CE&M Workshop: Defining a Research Agenda for AEC Process/Product Development in 2000 and Beyond
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityBerkeley
Period26/08/9928/08/99

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'We need a theory of construction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this