“What can be measured can be managed?”: But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsScientific

Abstract

Research Question: The aim of the paper is to consider, how could research on sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions be brought closer to each other, in order to benefit from both of them? Theoretical Framework: Sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions are both interdisciplinary approaches that aim to guide our production and consumption habits towards more sustainable trajectories. If used together, these approaches could create a powerful combination of theories and methods in addressing current sustainability challenges. However, the research and use of these theories seems to be separated. While the scope of sustainability assessment studies is often focused mainly on the environmental aspects (e.g. Sala et al. 2012), the transition studies often focus on other aspects of sustainable development, namely socio-economic, technological and institutional aspects and/or the governance of these (van den Bergh et al. 2011). A common aspect and interest for both approaches is the interest in analysing life cycle impacts, avoiding burden shifting and unwanted second-order effects in the context of environmental innovations and technologies. Methods: The paper aims to combine lessons learnt from several research and development projects in which sustainability assessment was applied as part of product and technology development. Findings from the projects are complemented using frameworks from transition management literature, considering the potential and challenges in linking these two approaches together. Findings: In order to understand and to manage the complex and interlinked sustainability challenges, interdisciplinary and comprehensive research methods and management frameworks would be needed. While a huge variety of assessment methods have been developed by the research community, these may have little change to spread for use in practice. Findings from Loorbach et al. (2010) point out that transition management could provide an approach that could be used for exploring new business strategies leading to transitions towards more sustainable systems. But a practical challenge seems to be, how can aspects requiring long-term thinking be integrated within daily decision-making, which is often guided by short-term economic impacts? Is it possible to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and to create frameworks that would allow measuring and managing complicated issues like sustainable development as part of streamlined business decision-making?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCorporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018
Subtitle of host publicationBook of abstracts
PublisherUniversity of Leeds Business School KEDGE
Pages127-128
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018
MoE publication typeNot Eligible
EventCorporate Responsibility Research Conference 2018: Engaging Business and Consumers for Sustainable - University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Duration: 12 Sep 201814 Sep 2018
Conference number: 13
http://crrconference.org/previous-conferences/crrc-2018/programme/

Conference

ConferenceCorporate Responsibility Research Conference 2018
Abbreviated titleCRRC 2018
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLeeds
Period12/09/1814/09/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

sustainability
sustainable development
decision making
interdisciplinary approach
product development
technological development
research method
assessment method
den
economic impact
development project
research and development
innovation
life cycle
trajectory
method

Keywords

  • sustainability assessment
  • sustainability transitions
  • management

Cite this

Pihkola, H. (2018). “What can be measured can be managed?”: But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions . In Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018: Book of abstracts (pp. 127-128). University of Leeds Business School KEDGE.
Pihkola, Hanna. / “What can be measured can be managed?” : But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions . Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018: Book of abstracts. University of Leeds Business School KEDGE, 2018. pp. 127-128
@inbook{3770688987c7415f9ed7d7ebddbbbc4f,
title = "“What can be measured can be managed?”: But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions",
abstract = "Research Question: The aim of the paper is to consider, how could research on sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions be brought closer to each other, in order to benefit from both of them? Theoretical Framework: Sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions are both interdisciplinary approaches that aim to guide our production and consumption habits towards more sustainable trajectories. If used together, these approaches could create a powerful combination of theories and methods in addressing current sustainability challenges. However, the research and use of these theories seems to be separated. While the scope of sustainability assessment studies is often focused mainly on the environmental aspects (e.g. Sala et al. 2012), the transition studies often focus on other aspects of sustainable development, namely socio-economic, technological and institutional aspects and/or the governance of these (van den Bergh et al. 2011). A common aspect and interest for both approaches is the interest in analysing life cycle impacts, avoiding burden shifting and unwanted second-order effects in the context of environmental innovations and technologies. Methods: The paper aims to combine lessons learnt from several research and development projects in which sustainability assessment was applied as part of product and technology development. Findings from the projects are complemented using frameworks from transition management literature, considering the potential and challenges in linking these two approaches together. Findings: In order to understand and to manage the complex and interlinked sustainability challenges, interdisciplinary and comprehensive research methods and management frameworks would be needed. While a huge variety of assessment methods have been developed by the research community, these may have little change to spread for use in practice. Findings from Loorbach et al. (2010) point out that transition management could provide an approach that could be used for exploring new business strategies leading to transitions towards more sustainable systems. But a practical challenge seems to be, how can aspects requiring long-term thinking be integrated within daily decision-making, which is often guided by short-term economic impacts? Is it possible to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and to create frameworks that would allow measuring and managing complicated issues like sustainable development as part of streamlined business decision-making?",
keywords = "sustainability assessment, sustainability transitions, management",
author = "Hanna Pihkola",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
language = "English",
pages = "127--128",
booktitle = "Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018",
publisher = "University of Leeds Business School KEDGE",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Pihkola, H 2018, “What can be measured can be managed?”: But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions . in Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018: Book of abstracts. University of Leeds Business School KEDGE, pp. 127-128, Corporate Responsibility Research Conference 2018, Leeds, United Kingdom, 12/09/18.

“What can be measured can be managed?” : But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions . / Pihkola, Hanna.

Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018: Book of abstracts. University of Leeds Business School KEDGE, 2018. p. 127-128.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference abstract in proceedingsScientific

TY - CHAP

T1 - “What can be measured can be managed?”

T2 - But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions

AU - Pihkola, Hanna

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Research Question: The aim of the paper is to consider, how could research on sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions be brought closer to each other, in order to benefit from both of them? Theoretical Framework: Sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions are both interdisciplinary approaches that aim to guide our production and consumption habits towards more sustainable trajectories. If used together, these approaches could create a powerful combination of theories and methods in addressing current sustainability challenges. However, the research and use of these theories seems to be separated. While the scope of sustainability assessment studies is often focused mainly on the environmental aspects (e.g. Sala et al. 2012), the transition studies often focus on other aspects of sustainable development, namely socio-economic, technological and institutional aspects and/or the governance of these (van den Bergh et al. 2011). A common aspect and interest for both approaches is the interest in analysing life cycle impacts, avoiding burden shifting and unwanted second-order effects in the context of environmental innovations and technologies. Methods: The paper aims to combine lessons learnt from several research and development projects in which sustainability assessment was applied as part of product and technology development. Findings from the projects are complemented using frameworks from transition management literature, considering the potential and challenges in linking these two approaches together. Findings: In order to understand and to manage the complex and interlinked sustainability challenges, interdisciplinary and comprehensive research methods and management frameworks would be needed. While a huge variety of assessment methods have been developed by the research community, these may have little change to spread for use in practice. Findings from Loorbach et al. (2010) point out that transition management could provide an approach that could be used for exploring new business strategies leading to transitions towards more sustainable systems. But a practical challenge seems to be, how can aspects requiring long-term thinking be integrated within daily decision-making, which is often guided by short-term economic impacts? Is it possible to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and to create frameworks that would allow measuring and managing complicated issues like sustainable development as part of streamlined business decision-making?

AB - Research Question: The aim of the paper is to consider, how could research on sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions be brought closer to each other, in order to benefit from both of them? Theoretical Framework: Sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions are both interdisciplinary approaches that aim to guide our production and consumption habits towards more sustainable trajectories. If used together, these approaches could create a powerful combination of theories and methods in addressing current sustainability challenges. However, the research and use of these theories seems to be separated. While the scope of sustainability assessment studies is often focused mainly on the environmental aspects (e.g. Sala et al. 2012), the transition studies often focus on other aspects of sustainable development, namely socio-economic, technological and institutional aspects and/or the governance of these (van den Bergh et al. 2011). A common aspect and interest for both approaches is the interest in analysing life cycle impacts, avoiding burden shifting and unwanted second-order effects in the context of environmental innovations and technologies. Methods: The paper aims to combine lessons learnt from several research and development projects in which sustainability assessment was applied as part of product and technology development. Findings from the projects are complemented using frameworks from transition management literature, considering the potential and challenges in linking these two approaches together. Findings: In order to understand and to manage the complex and interlinked sustainability challenges, interdisciplinary and comprehensive research methods and management frameworks would be needed. While a huge variety of assessment methods have been developed by the research community, these may have little change to spread for use in practice. Findings from Loorbach et al. (2010) point out that transition management could provide an approach that could be used for exploring new business strategies leading to transitions towards more sustainable systems. But a practical challenge seems to be, how can aspects requiring long-term thinking be integrated within daily decision-making, which is often guided by short-term economic impacts? Is it possible to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and to create frameworks that would allow measuring and managing complicated issues like sustainable development as part of streamlined business decision-making?

KW - sustainability assessment

KW - sustainability transitions

KW - management

M3 - Conference abstract in proceedings

SP - 127

EP - 128

BT - Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018

PB - University of Leeds Business School KEDGE

ER -

Pihkola H. “What can be measured can be managed?”: But can we measure and can we manage? Linking theories of sustainability assessment and sustainability transitions . In Corporate Responsibility Research Conference CRRC 2018: Book of abstracts. University of Leeds Business School KEDGE. 2018. p. 127-128