What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry? Social license to operate perspective

Nina Wessberg, Helena Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Johanna Kohl

Research output: Book/ReportReport

Abstract

This publication provides an overview of what the Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining practices. The analysis is part of Tekes' Green Mining program SAM project (Sustainable and Acceptable Mining). A number of interviews were made in Australia with researchers and representatives of mining activities. The interviews were conducted in collaboration with the Australian CSIRO research institute. The interviewees were asked about how the Australian mining industry handle issues related to social acceptability and what kind of good practices exist. Concrete examples of good practice were however rare. Two the most significant were: 1) to hire to the mine planning process always an experienced independent mining expert, whose task is to guide the process and ensure that everything necessary will be taken into account, as well as 2), underlining the strong position of the mining industry trade association in directing and acting in the mining industry and the future development. Based on interviews, it can be said that the challenges of the Finnish and Australian mining social acceptability of the field do not differ from each other significantly. Australia's largest mining challenges from the perspective of social acceptability are satisfactory completion of closing the mines and the creation of trust between the authorities and other stakeholders; the concern is that the authorities favor the mining industry in the interests of the rest of society, sacrificing, and on the other hand, the communication processes do not reach or touch different people. In Australia the mines are often located in the real wilderness. Employees fly to work in the mine, are working at a certain period, and then fly back home. Regional economic significance of the mines remain so low and the environmental impact of mines is to a large extent affecting specifically indigenous people. It was also made clear that consideration of the social impact in the mining processes and the achievement of social acceptability are often more feasible in larger companies than smaller companies. Also the Wallaby case, where communication process was thorough and successful, as well as the written guidelines are worth mentioning.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)978-951-38-8439-0
Publication statusPublished - 2016
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Publication series

SeriesVTT Technology
Number264
ISSN2242-1211

Fingerprint

mining industry
communication
social impact
planning process
stakeholder
environmental impact
economics

Keywords

  • mining industry
  • Australia
  • social licence to operate

Cite this

Wessberg, N., Wessman-Jääskeläinen, H., & Kohl, J. (2016). What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry? Social license to operate perspective. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Technology, No. 264
Wessberg, Nina ; Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena ; Kohl, Johanna. / What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry? Social license to operate perspective. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2016. 23 p. (VTT Technology; No. 264).
@book{38121766f04d4e37bb6235673bd0b728,
title = "What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry?: Social license to operate perspective",
abstract = "This publication provides an overview of what the Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining practices. The analysis is part of Tekes' Green Mining program SAM project (Sustainable and Acceptable Mining). A number of interviews were made in Australia with researchers and representatives of mining activities. The interviews were conducted in collaboration with the Australian CSIRO research institute. The interviewees were asked about how the Australian mining industry handle issues related to social acceptability and what kind of good practices exist. Concrete examples of good practice were however rare. Two the most significant were: 1) to hire to the mine planning process always an experienced independent mining expert, whose task is to guide the process and ensure that everything necessary will be taken into account, as well as 2), underlining the strong position of the mining industry trade association in directing and acting in the mining industry and the future development. Based on interviews, it can be said that the challenges of the Finnish and Australian mining social acceptability of the field do not differ from each other significantly. Australia's largest mining challenges from the perspective of social acceptability are satisfactory completion of closing the mines and the creation of trust between the authorities and other stakeholders; the concern is that the authorities favor the mining industry in the interests of the rest of society, sacrificing, and on the other hand, the communication processes do not reach or touch different people. In Australia the mines are often located in the real wilderness. Employees fly to work in the mine, are working at a certain period, and then fly back home. Regional economic significance of the mines remain so low and the environmental impact of mines is to a large extent affecting specifically indigenous people. It was also made clear that consideration of the social impact in the mining processes and the achievement of social acceptability are often more feasible in larger companies than smaller companies. Also the Wallaby case, where communication process was thorough and successful, as well as the written guidelines are worth mentioning.",
keywords = "mining industry, Australia, social licence to operate",
author = "Nina Wessberg and Helena Wessman-J{\"a}{\"a}skel{\"a}inen and Johanna Kohl",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
series = "VTT Technology",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
number = "264",
address = "Finland",

}

Wessberg, N, Wessman-Jääskeläinen, H & Kohl, J 2016, What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry? Social license to operate perspective. VTT Technology, no. 264, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry? Social license to operate perspective. / Wessberg, Nina; Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena; Kohl, Johanna.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2016. 23 p. (VTT Technology; No. 264).

Research output: Book/ReportReport

TY - BOOK

T1 - What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry?

T2 - Social license to operate perspective

AU - Wessberg, Nina

AU - Wessman-Jääskeläinen, Helena

AU - Kohl, Johanna

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This publication provides an overview of what the Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining practices. The analysis is part of Tekes' Green Mining program SAM project (Sustainable and Acceptable Mining). A number of interviews were made in Australia with researchers and representatives of mining activities. The interviews were conducted in collaboration with the Australian CSIRO research institute. The interviewees were asked about how the Australian mining industry handle issues related to social acceptability and what kind of good practices exist. Concrete examples of good practice were however rare. Two the most significant were: 1) to hire to the mine planning process always an experienced independent mining expert, whose task is to guide the process and ensure that everything necessary will be taken into account, as well as 2), underlining the strong position of the mining industry trade association in directing and acting in the mining industry and the future development. Based on interviews, it can be said that the challenges of the Finnish and Australian mining social acceptability of the field do not differ from each other significantly. Australia's largest mining challenges from the perspective of social acceptability are satisfactory completion of closing the mines and the creation of trust between the authorities and other stakeholders; the concern is that the authorities favor the mining industry in the interests of the rest of society, sacrificing, and on the other hand, the communication processes do not reach or touch different people. In Australia the mines are often located in the real wilderness. Employees fly to work in the mine, are working at a certain period, and then fly back home. Regional economic significance of the mines remain so low and the environmental impact of mines is to a large extent affecting specifically indigenous people. It was also made clear that consideration of the social impact in the mining processes and the achievement of social acceptability are often more feasible in larger companies than smaller companies. Also the Wallaby case, where communication process was thorough and successful, as well as the written guidelines are worth mentioning.

AB - This publication provides an overview of what the Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining practices. The analysis is part of Tekes' Green Mining program SAM project (Sustainable and Acceptable Mining). A number of interviews were made in Australia with researchers and representatives of mining activities. The interviews were conducted in collaboration with the Australian CSIRO research institute. The interviewees were asked about how the Australian mining industry handle issues related to social acceptability and what kind of good practices exist. Concrete examples of good practice were however rare. Two the most significant were: 1) to hire to the mine planning process always an experienced independent mining expert, whose task is to guide the process and ensure that everything necessary will be taken into account, as well as 2), underlining the strong position of the mining industry trade association in directing and acting in the mining industry and the future development. Based on interviews, it can be said that the challenges of the Finnish and Australian mining social acceptability of the field do not differ from each other significantly. Australia's largest mining challenges from the perspective of social acceptability are satisfactory completion of closing the mines and the creation of trust between the authorities and other stakeholders; the concern is that the authorities favor the mining industry in the interests of the rest of society, sacrificing, and on the other hand, the communication processes do not reach or touch different people. In Australia the mines are often located in the real wilderness. Employees fly to work in the mine, are working at a certain period, and then fly back home. Regional economic significance of the mines remain so low and the environmental impact of mines is to a large extent affecting specifically indigenous people. It was also made clear that consideration of the social impact in the mining processes and the achievement of social acceptability are often more feasible in larger companies than smaller companies. Also the Wallaby case, where communication process was thorough and successful, as well as the written guidelines are worth mentioning.

KW - mining industry

KW - Australia

KW - social licence to operate

M3 - Report

T3 - VTT Technology

BT - What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry?

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Wessberg N, Wessman-Jääskeläinen H, Kohl J. What Finnish mining industry could learn from the Australian mining industry? Social license to operate perspective. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2016. 23 p. (VTT Technology; No. 264).