Who is responsible for food risks? The influence of risk type and risk characteristics

Sointu Leikas (Corresponding Author), Marjaana Lindeman, Katariina Roininen, Liisa Lähteenmäki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence of food risk type and risk characteristics on food risk responsibility judgments was studied. A total of 1270 Finnish consumers judged their personal responsibility and the responsibility of three non-personal targets, industry, retail, and society, in relation to six food-related risks. They also evaluated the risks on several psychometric dimensions. The ratings were gathered via internet questionnaire. Industry and society were considered to be most responsible for all risks but the risk of cardiovascular disease, for which personal responsibility was considered to be highest. Judgments of personal controllability predicted personal responsibility judgments, and unnaturalness judgments predicted non-personal targets’ judged responsibility. Personal responsibility judgments were related to different risk dimensions than judgments of non-personal targets’ responsibility.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-126
JournalAppetite
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Food
Industry
Psychometrics
Internet
Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

  • Food risk
  • Responsibility
  • Risk characteristics

Cite this

Leikas, Sointu ; Lindeman, Marjaana ; Roininen, Katariina ; Lähteenmäki, Liisa. / Who is responsible for food risks? The influence of risk type and risk characteristics. In: Appetite. 2009 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 123-126.
@article{ba8cadf9a64549afaec3289225fe7828,
title = "Who is responsible for food risks?: The influence of risk type and risk characteristics",
abstract = "The influence of food risk type and risk characteristics on food risk responsibility judgments was studied. A total of 1270 Finnish consumers judged their personal responsibility and the responsibility of three non-personal targets, industry, retail, and society, in relation to six food-related risks. They also evaluated the risks on several psychometric dimensions. The ratings were gathered via internet questionnaire. Industry and society were considered to be most responsible for all risks but the risk of cardiovascular disease, for which personal responsibility was considered to be highest. Judgments of personal controllability predicted personal responsibility judgments, and unnaturalness judgments predicted non-personal targets’ judged responsibility. Personal responsibility judgments were related to different risk dimensions than judgments of non-personal targets’ responsibility.",
keywords = "Food risk, Responsibility, Risk characteristics",
author = "Sointu Leikas and Marjaana Lindeman and Katariina Roininen and Liisa L{\"a}hteenm{\"a}ki",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.003",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "123--126",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Leikas, S, Lindeman, M, Roininen, K & Lähteenmäki, L 2009, 'Who is responsible for food risks? The influence of risk type and risk characteristics', Appetite, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.003

Who is responsible for food risks? The influence of risk type and risk characteristics. / Leikas, Sointu (Corresponding Author); Lindeman, Marjaana; Roininen, Katariina; Lähteenmäki, Liisa.

In: Appetite, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2009, p. 123-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who is responsible for food risks?

T2 - The influence of risk type and risk characteristics

AU - Leikas, Sointu

AU - Lindeman, Marjaana

AU - Roininen, Katariina

AU - Lähteenmäki, Liisa

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The influence of food risk type and risk characteristics on food risk responsibility judgments was studied. A total of 1270 Finnish consumers judged their personal responsibility and the responsibility of three non-personal targets, industry, retail, and society, in relation to six food-related risks. They also evaluated the risks on several psychometric dimensions. The ratings were gathered via internet questionnaire. Industry and society were considered to be most responsible for all risks but the risk of cardiovascular disease, for which personal responsibility was considered to be highest. Judgments of personal controllability predicted personal responsibility judgments, and unnaturalness judgments predicted non-personal targets’ judged responsibility. Personal responsibility judgments were related to different risk dimensions than judgments of non-personal targets’ responsibility.

AB - The influence of food risk type and risk characteristics on food risk responsibility judgments was studied. A total of 1270 Finnish consumers judged their personal responsibility and the responsibility of three non-personal targets, industry, retail, and society, in relation to six food-related risks. They also evaluated the risks on several psychometric dimensions. The ratings were gathered via internet questionnaire. Industry and society were considered to be most responsible for all risks but the risk of cardiovascular disease, for which personal responsibility was considered to be highest. Judgments of personal controllability predicted personal responsibility judgments, and unnaturalness judgments predicted non-personal targets’ judged responsibility. Personal responsibility judgments were related to different risk dimensions than judgments of non-personal targets’ responsibility.

KW - Food risk

KW - Responsibility

KW - Risk characteristics

U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.003

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 123

EP - 126

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

IS - 1

ER -