Why Is Road Safety in the U.S. Not on Par with Sweden, the U.K., and the Netherlands? Lessons to be Learned

Juha Luoma, Michael Sivak

Research output: Book/ReportReport

Abstract

This study compared road safety and related factors in the U.S. with those in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, in order to identify actions most likely to produce casualty reductions in the U.S. The reviewed topics were basic country statistics, road fatalities and various fatality rates, national road-safety strategies, and selected road-safety issues. The main differences concerned structural and cultural factors (such as vehicle distance driven), and procedural factors (such as road-safety strategies and targets, alcohol-impaired driving, exceeding speed limits, and use of seat belts). The main recommendations for improving road safety in the U.S. are as follows: (1) lower states’ BAC limits to 0.5 g/l and introduce effective random breath testing, (2) reexamine the current speed-limit policies and improve speed enforcement, (3) implement primary seat-belt-wearing laws in each state that would cover both front and rear occupants, and reward vehicle manufacturers for installation of advanced seat-belt reminders, (4) reconsider road-safety target setting so that the focus is on reducing fatalities and not on reducing fatality rate per distance driven, and (5) consider new strategies to reduce vehicle distance driven.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages32
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013
MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

Publication series

SeriesReport No. UMTRI-2013-1

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Statistics
Testing

Keywords

  • road safety
  • the U.S.
  • Sweden
  • the United Kingdom
  • the Netherlands

Cite this

Luoma, Juha ; Sivak, Michael. / Why Is Road Safety in the U.S. Not on Par with Sweden, the U.K., and the Netherlands? Lessons to be Learned. 2013. 32 p. (Report No. UMTRI-2013-1).
@book{705574c280fe4c70a812467b22e5a6ce,
title = "Why Is Road Safety in the U.S. Not on Par with Sweden, the U.K., and the Netherlands?: Lessons to be Learned",
abstract = "This study compared road safety and related factors in the U.S. with those in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, in order to identify actions most likely to produce casualty reductions in the U.S. The reviewed topics were basic country statistics, road fatalities and various fatality rates, national road-safety strategies, and selected road-safety issues. The main differences concerned structural and cultural factors (such as vehicle distance driven), and procedural factors (such as road-safety strategies and targets, alcohol-impaired driving, exceeding speed limits, and use of seat belts). The main recommendations for improving road safety in the U.S. are as follows: (1) lower states’ BAC limits to 0.5 g/l and introduce effective random breath testing, (2) reexamine the current speed-limit policies and improve speed enforcement, (3) implement primary seat-belt-wearing laws in each state that would cover both front and rear occupants, and reward vehicle manufacturers for installation of advanced seat-belt reminders, (4) reconsider road-safety target setting so that the focus is on reducing fatalities and not on reducing fatality rate per distance driven, and (5) consider new strategies to reduce vehicle distance driven.",
keywords = "road safety, the U.S., Sweden, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands",
author = "Juha Luoma and Michael Sivak",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
language = "English",
series = "Report No. UMTRI-2013-1",

}

Why Is Road Safety in the U.S. Not on Par with Sweden, the U.K., and the Netherlands? Lessons to be Learned. / Luoma, Juha; Sivak, Michael.

2013. 32 p. (Report No. UMTRI-2013-1).

Research output: Book/ReportReport

TY - BOOK

T1 - Why Is Road Safety in the U.S. Not on Par with Sweden, the U.K., and the Netherlands?

T2 - Lessons to be Learned

AU - Luoma, Juha

AU - Sivak, Michael

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - This study compared road safety and related factors in the U.S. with those in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, in order to identify actions most likely to produce casualty reductions in the U.S. The reviewed topics were basic country statistics, road fatalities and various fatality rates, national road-safety strategies, and selected road-safety issues. The main differences concerned structural and cultural factors (such as vehicle distance driven), and procedural factors (such as road-safety strategies and targets, alcohol-impaired driving, exceeding speed limits, and use of seat belts). The main recommendations for improving road safety in the U.S. are as follows: (1) lower states’ BAC limits to 0.5 g/l and introduce effective random breath testing, (2) reexamine the current speed-limit policies and improve speed enforcement, (3) implement primary seat-belt-wearing laws in each state that would cover both front and rear occupants, and reward vehicle manufacturers for installation of advanced seat-belt reminders, (4) reconsider road-safety target setting so that the focus is on reducing fatalities and not on reducing fatality rate per distance driven, and (5) consider new strategies to reduce vehicle distance driven.

AB - This study compared road safety and related factors in the U.S. with those in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, in order to identify actions most likely to produce casualty reductions in the U.S. The reviewed topics were basic country statistics, road fatalities and various fatality rates, national road-safety strategies, and selected road-safety issues. The main differences concerned structural and cultural factors (such as vehicle distance driven), and procedural factors (such as road-safety strategies and targets, alcohol-impaired driving, exceeding speed limits, and use of seat belts). The main recommendations for improving road safety in the U.S. are as follows: (1) lower states’ BAC limits to 0.5 g/l and introduce effective random breath testing, (2) reexamine the current speed-limit policies and improve speed enforcement, (3) implement primary seat-belt-wearing laws in each state that would cover both front and rear occupants, and reward vehicle manufacturers for installation of advanced seat-belt reminders, (4) reconsider road-safety target setting so that the focus is on reducing fatalities and not on reducing fatality rate per distance driven, and (5) consider new strategies to reduce vehicle distance driven.

KW - road safety

KW - the U.S.

KW - Sweden

KW - the United Kingdom

KW - the Netherlands

UR - http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/168424.aspx

M3 - Report

T3 - Report No. UMTRI-2013-1

BT - Why Is Road Safety in the U.S. Not on Par with Sweden, the U.K., and the Netherlands?

ER -