Within-field variation in grain yield, yield components and quality traits of two-row barley

A. Rajala, P. Peltonen-Sainio, R. Kauppila, Annika Wilhelmson, P. Reinikainen, J. Kleemola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies of precision cereal farming systems have documented large within-field and annual variation in grain yield and quality. The principal aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of within- and between-field variation in biomass, yield, yield component structure and quality traits, such as grain protein of two-row barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), using crop samples collected from field patches of varying yield potential. Plant samples were collected from the fields of commercial farmers located in southern Finland in 2000 and 2001. Selection of low, intermediate and high yielding patches for crop sampling was based on aerial infrared colour images taken twice during the growing season. When stands were mature, plant samples from an area of 0·5 m2 were uprooted for yield component and quality analysis. Nitrogen accumulation prior to heading was strongly associated with biomass accumulation, indicating differences in growth potential of the different field patches. The principal yield determining trait in two-row barley was grain number/m2, whereas single grain weight (SGW) had a lesser effect on grain yield. The degree of variation in the quality parameters, namely protein and SGW, was not associated with grain yield. This suggests that within-field variation in yield potential does not determine heterogeneity of the grain yield in terms of grain weight or grain protein content.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-454
JournalJournal of Agricultural Science
Volume145
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Hordeum
yield components
grain yield
barley
Weights and Measures
Biomass
grain protein
Proteins
Finland
Agriculture
Nitrogen
Color
sampling
crops
mature plants
heading
Hordeum vulgare
Growth
biomass production
farming systems

Keywords

  • yield
  • grains
  • barley
  • barley quality
  • agriculture

Cite this

Rajala, A., Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kauppila, R., Wilhelmson, A., Reinikainen, P., & Kleemola, J. (2007). Within-field variation in grain yield, yield components and quality traits of two-row barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, 145(5), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960700723X
Rajala, A. ; Peltonen-Sainio, P. ; Kauppila, R. ; Wilhelmson, Annika ; Reinikainen, P. ; Kleemola, J. / Within-field variation in grain yield, yield components and quality traits of two-row barley. In: Journal of Agricultural Science. 2007 ; Vol. 145, No. 5. pp. 445-454.
@article{5b7f720448254738b5a93b45e2379bb1,
title = "Within-field variation in grain yield, yield components and quality traits of two-row barley",
abstract = "Recent studies of precision cereal farming systems have documented large within-field and annual variation in grain yield and quality. The principal aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of within- and between-field variation in biomass, yield, yield component structure and quality traits, such as grain protein of two-row barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), using crop samples collected from field patches of varying yield potential. Plant samples were collected from the fields of commercial farmers located in southern Finland in 2000 and 2001. Selection of low, intermediate and high yielding patches for crop sampling was based on aerial infrared colour images taken twice during the growing season. When stands were mature, plant samples from an area of 0·5 m2 were uprooted for yield component and quality analysis. Nitrogen accumulation prior to heading was strongly associated with biomass accumulation, indicating differences in growth potential of the different field patches. The principal yield determining trait in two-row barley was grain number/m2, whereas single grain weight (SGW) had a lesser effect on grain yield. The degree of variation in the quality parameters, namely protein and SGW, was not associated with grain yield. This suggests that within-field variation in yield potential does not determine heterogeneity of the grain yield in terms of grain weight or grain protein content.",
keywords = "yield, grains, barley, barley quality, agriculture",
author = "A. Rajala and P. Peltonen-Sainio and R. Kauppila and Annika Wilhelmson and P. Reinikainen and J. Kleemola",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1017/S002185960700723X",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "445--454",
journal = "Journal of Agricultural Science",
issn = "0021-8596",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

Rajala, A, Peltonen-Sainio, P, Kauppila, R, Wilhelmson, A, Reinikainen, P & Kleemola, J 2007, 'Within-field variation in grain yield, yield components and quality traits of two-row barley', Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960700723X

Within-field variation in grain yield, yield components and quality traits of two-row barley. / Rajala, A.; Peltonen-Sainio, P.; Kauppila, R.; Wilhelmson, Annika; Reinikainen, P.; Kleemola, J.

In: Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 145, No. 5, 2007, p. 445-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Within-field variation in grain yield, yield components and quality traits of two-row barley

AU - Rajala, A.

AU - Peltonen-Sainio, P.

AU - Kauppila, R.

AU - Wilhelmson, Annika

AU - Reinikainen, P.

AU - Kleemola, J.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Recent studies of precision cereal farming systems have documented large within-field and annual variation in grain yield and quality. The principal aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of within- and between-field variation in biomass, yield, yield component structure and quality traits, such as grain protein of two-row barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), using crop samples collected from field patches of varying yield potential. Plant samples were collected from the fields of commercial farmers located in southern Finland in 2000 and 2001. Selection of low, intermediate and high yielding patches for crop sampling was based on aerial infrared colour images taken twice during the growing season. When stands were mature, plant samples from an area of 0·5 m2 were uprooted for yield component and quality analysis. Nitrogen accumulation prior to heading was strongly associated with biomass accumulation, indicating differences in growth potential of the different field patches. The principal yield determining trait in two-row barley was grain number/m2, whereas single grain weight (SGW) had a lesser effect on grain yield. The degree of variation in the quality parameters, namely protein and SGW, was not associated with grain yield. This suggests that within-field variation in yield potential does not determine heterogeneity of the grain yield in terms of grain weight or grain protein content.

AB - Recent studies of precision cereal farming systems have documented large within-field and annual variation in grain yield and quality. The principal aim of the present study was to evaluate the degree of within- and between-field variation in biomass, yield, yield component structure and quality traits, such as grain protein of two-row barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), using crop samples collected from field patches of varying yield potential. Plant samples were collected from the fields of commercial farmers located in southern Finland in 2000 and 2001. Selection of low, intermediate and high yielding patches for crop sampling was based on aerial infrared colour images taken twice during the growing season. When stands were mature, plant samples from an area of 0·5 m2 were uprooted for yield component and quality analysis. Nitrogen accumulation prior to heading was strongly associated with biomass accumulation, indicating differences in growth potential of the different field patches. The principal yield determining trait in two-row barley was grain number/m2, whereas single grain weight (SGW) had a lesser effect on grain yield. The degree of variation in the quality parameters, namely protein and SGW, was not associated with grain yield. This suggests that within-field variation in yield potential does not determine heterogeneity of the grain yield in terms of grain weight or grain protein content.

KW - yield

KW - grains

KW - barley

KW - barley quality

KW - agriculture

U2 - 10.1017/S002185960700723X

DO - 10.1017/S002185960700723X

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 445

EP - 454

JO - Journal of Agricultural Science

JF - Journal of Agricultural Science

SN - 0021-8596

IS - 5

ER -